Literature DB >> 31663969

Optimal Pancreatic Surgery: Are We Making Progress in North America?

Joal D Beane1, Jeffrey D Borrebach1, Amer H Zureikat1, E Molly Kilbane2, Vanessa M Thompson3, Henry A Pitt4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our aims were to assess North American trends in the management of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and distal pancreatectomy (DP), and to quantify the delivery of optimal pancreatic surgery.
BACKGROUND: Morbidity after pancreatectomy remains unacceptably high. Recent literature suggests that composite measures may more accurately define surgical quality.
METHODS: The 2013 to 2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Files were queried to identify patients undergoing PD (N = 16,222) and DP (N = 7946). Patient, process, procedure, and 30-day postoperative outcome variables were analyzed over time. Optimal pancreatic surgery was defined as the absence of postoperative mortality, serious morbidity, percutaneous drainage, and reoperation while achieving a length of stay equal to or less than the 75th percentile (12 days for PD and 7 days for DP) with no readmissions. Risk-adjusted time-trend analyses were performed using logistic regression, and the threshold for statistical significance was P ≤ 0.05.
RESULTS: The use of minimally invasive PD did not change over time, but robotic PD increased (2.5 to 4.2%; P < 0.001) and laparoscopic PD decreased (5.8% to 4.3%; P < 0.02). Operative times decreased (P < 0.05) and fewer transfusions were administered (P < 0.001). The percentage of patients with a drain fluid amylase checked on postoperative day 1 increased (P < 0.001), and a greater percentage of surgical drains were removed by postoperative day 3 (P < 0.001). Overall morbidity (P < 0.02), mortality (P < 0.05), and postoperative length of stay (P = 0.002) decreased. Finally, the rate of optimal pancreatic surgery increased for PD (53.7% to 56.9%; P < 0.01) and DP (53.3% to 58.5%; P < 0.001), and alspo for patients with pancreatic cancer (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: From 2013 to 2017, pre, intra, and perioperative pancreatectomy processes have evolved, and multiple postoperative outcomes have improved. Thus, in 4 years, optimal pancreatic surgery in North America has increased by 3% to 5%.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31663969     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  7 in total

1.  Novel Calculator to Estimate the Risk of Clinically Relevant Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Following Distal Pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Ibrahim Nassour; Samer AlMasri; Jacob C Hodges; Steven J Hughes; Amer Zureikat; Alessandro Paniccia
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  A National Assessment of Optimal Oncologic Surgery for Distal Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Katherine Hrebinko; Samer Tohme; Richard S Hoehn; Samer AlMasri; Sidrah Khan; Christof Kaltenmeier; Kenneth K Lee; Alessandro Paniccia; Amer Zureikat; Ibrahim Nassour
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 3.  State of the art of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Niccolò Napoli; Emanuele F Kauffmann; Fabio Vistoli; Gabriella Amorese; Ugo Boggi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-05-20

4.  Postoperative single-sequence (PoSSe) MRI: imaging work-up for CT-guided or endoscopic drainage indication of collections after hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery.

Authors:  Uli Fehrenbach; Timo A Auer; Wenzel Schöning; Moritz Schmelzle; Christian Jürgensen; Thomas Malinka; Marcus Bahra; Dominik Geisel; Timm Denecke
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-02-15

Review 5.  Improvement in distal pancreatectomy for tumors in the body and tail of the pancreas.

Authors:  Li Jiang; Deng Ning; Xiao-Ping Chen
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Simulation training in pancreatico-jejunostomy using an inanimate biotissue model improves the technical skills of hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgical fellows.

Authors:  Ryuji Yoshioka; Hiroshi Imamura; Hirofumi Ichida; Yu Gyoda; Tomoya Mizuno; Yoshihiro Mise; Akio Saiura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Textbook outcomes in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Timothy Michael Pawlik; Dimitrios Moris
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.