Li Jiang1, Deng Ning1, Xiao-Ping Chen2. 1. Department of Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China. 2. Hepatic Surgery Center, Affiliated Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China. jiangli@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic resections are complex and technically challenging surgical procedures. They often come with potential limitations to high-volume centers. Distal pancreatectomy is a relatively simple procedure in most cases. It facilitates the development of up-to-date minimally invasive surgical procedures in pancreatic surgery including laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy. MAIN BODY: To obtain a desirable long-term prognosis, R0 resection and adequate lymphadenectomy are crucial to the surgical management of pancreatic cancer, and they demand standard procedure and multi-visceral resection if necessary. With respect to combined organ resection, progress has been made in evaluating and determining when and how to preserve the spleen. The postoperative pancreatic fistula, however, remains the most significant complication of distal pancreatectomy, with a rather high incidence. In addition, a safe closure of the pancreatic remnant persists as an area of concern. Therefore, much efforts that focus on the management of the pancreatic stump have been made to mitigate morbidity. CONCLUSION: This review summarized the historical development of the techniques for pancreatic resections in recent years and describes the progress. The review eventually looked into the controversies regarding distal pancreatectomy for tumors in the body and tail of the pancreas.
BACKGROUND: Pancreatic resections are complex and technically challenging surgical procedures. They often come with potential limitations to high-volume centers. Distal pancreatectomy is a relatively simple procedure in most cases. It facilitates the development of up-to-date minimally invasive surgical procedures in pancreatic surgery including laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy. MAIN BODY: To obtain a desirable long-term prognosis, R0 resection and adequate lymphadenectomy are crucial to the surgical management of pancreatic cancer, and they demand standard procedure and multi-visceral resection if necessary. With respect to combined organ resection, progress has been made in evaluating and determining when and how to preserve the spleen. The postoperative pancreatic fistula, however, remains the most significant complication of distal pancreatectomy, with a rather high incidence. In addition, a safe closure of the pancreatic remnant persists as an area of concern. Therefore, much efforts that focus on the management of the pancreatic stump have been made to mitigate morbidity. CONCLUSION: This review summarized the historical development of the techniques for pancreatic resections in recent years and describes the progress. The review eventually looked into the controversies regarding distal pancreatectomy for tumors in the body and tail of the pancreas.
Entities:
Keywords:
Minimally invasive surgical procedure; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic cancer
Authors: John A Stauffer; Armando Rosales-Velderrain; Ross F Goldberg; Steven P Bowers; Horacio J Asbun Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2012-11-05 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Ser Yee Lee; Peter J Allen; Eran Sadot; Michael I D'Angelica; Ronald P DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; William R Jarnagin; T Peter Kingham Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2014-10-15 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Cristina R Ferrone; Ioannis T Konstantinidis; Dushyant V Sahani; Jennifer A Wargo; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo; Andrew L Warshaw Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Emre F Yekebas; Dean Bogoevski; Guellue Cataldegirmen; Christina Kunze; Andreas Marx; Yogesh K Vashist; Paulus G Schurr; Lena Liebl; Sabrina Thieltges; Karim A Gawad; Claus Schneider; Jakob R Izbicki Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Robert C G Martin; Charles R Scoggins; Vasili Egnatashvili; Charles A Staley; Kelly M McMasters; David A Kooby Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2009-02
Authors: Sjors Klompmaker; Jony van Hilst; Sarah L Gerritsen; Mustapha Adham; M Teresa Albiol Quer; Claudio Bassi; Frederik Berrevoet; Ugo Boggi; Olivier R Busch; Manuela Cesaretti; Raffaele Dalla Valle; Benjamin Darnis; Matteo De Pastena; Marco Del Chiaro; Robert Grützmann; Markus K Diener; Traian Dumitrascu; Helmut Friess; Arpad Ivanecz; Anastasios Karayiannakis; Giuseppe K Fusai; Knut J Labori; Carlo Lombardo; Santiago López-Ben; Jean-Yves Mabrut; Willem Niesen; Fernando Pardo; Julie Perinel; Irinel Popescu; Geert Roeyen; Alain Sauvanet; Raj Prasad; Christian Sturesson; Mickael Lesurtel; Jorg Kleeff; Roberto Salvia; Marc G Besselink Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2018-03-12 Impact factor: 5.344