Literature DB >> 31663889

What Is the Normal Ulnar Bow in Adult Patients?

Jeremy Hreha1, Dominick V Congiusta1, Irfan H Ahmed1, Michael M Vosbikian1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rotation of the forearm is a result of the complex interaction among the radius, ulna, and interosseous membrane. Although the radius is recognized as curved, the ulna is generally thought of as a "straight bone." To better describe normal anatomy, which may lead to more successful anatomic fixation of forearm fractures, we aimed to apply a method of measuring the normal ulnar bow and determine the mean ulnar bow in adults. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) To what degree is the ulna bowed in the coronal and sagittal planes in normal adult forearms? (2) To what degree is the radius bowed in the coronal plane in normal adult forearms?
METHODS: Radiographs of the forearms of adults taken during a 1-year period were initially obtained retrospectively. These radiographs were performed for various reasons, including forearm pain and routine radiographic follow-up. Radiographs were excluded if evidence of a fracture or post-fracture fixation was found, if a patient had missing AP or lateral images, or if a suboptimal technique was used. The coronal and sagittal bow of the ulna was measured with a method adapted from previous studies that assessed radial bow using AP and lateral radiographs, respectively. Similar measurements were made in the coronal plane for the radius. All measurements were performed independently by the four authors. There was excellent interobserver reliability for ulnar bow in the coronal and sagittal planes (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.96 and 0.97, respectively) and for radial bow in the coronal plane (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.90).
RESULTS: The mean maximal coronal ulnar bow was 7 ± 2 mm and was located at 75% of the ulnar length, measured proximally to distally. The location of coronal bow was consistently distal to the radial bow location. The mean maximal sagittal ulnar bow was 6 ± 3 mm and was located at 39% of the ulnar length. The mean maximal coronal bow of the radius was 14 ± 2.0 mm and was 59% of the total length of the radius from proximal to distal.
CONCLUSIONS: The ulna is not a "straight bone," as is commonly thought, but rather has a bow in both the coronal and sagittal planes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Knowledge of the standard ulnar bow may be pivotal to prevent malunion of the ulna during surgery. Future research using these data in preoperative planning may lead to changes in plate contouring and clinical outcomes in forearm fracture management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31663889      PMCID: PMC7000043          DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.755


  17 in total

1.  Angular deformities and forearm function.

Authors:  A Sarmiento; E Ebramzadeh; D Brys; R Tarr
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  A comparison of malreduction after plate and intramedullary nail fixation of forearm fractures.

Authors:  E H Schemitsch; D Jones; M B Henley; A F Tencer
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  "Isolated" traumatic radial-head dislocation.

Authors:  T L Lincoln; S J Mubarak
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

4.  Fractures of the radius and ulna in adults: an analysis of factors affecting outcome.

Authors:  F C Wilson; D R Dirschl; D K Bynum
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  1997

5.  Redefining the proximal ulna anatomy.

Authors:  Ceren Günenç Beşer; Deniz Demiryürek; Hakan Özsoy; Burcu Erçakmak; Mutlu Hayran; Onur Kızılay; Arzu Özsoy
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Impact of olecranon fracture malunion: Study on the importance of PUDA (Proximal Ulna Dorsal Angulation).

Authors:  Julien Chapleau; Frédéric Balg; Edward J Harvey; Jérémie Ménard; Frédéric Vauclair; G-Yves Laflamme; Jonah Hebert-Davies; Dominique M Rouleau
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  How does torsional deformity of the radial shaft influence the rotation of the forearm? A biomechanical study.

Authors:  Philip Kasten; Mathias Krefft; Jürgen Hesselbach; Annelie M Weinberg
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Forearm fractures: treatment by rigid fixation with early motion.

Authors:  T G Grace; W W Eversmann
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  In Vivo Three-Dimensional Analysis of Malunited Forearm Diaphyseal Fractures with Forearm Rotational Restriction.

Authors:  Shingo Abe; Tsuyoshi Murase; Kunihiro Oka; Atsuo Shigi; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  A comparison of fixation methods in adolescent patients with diaphyseal forearm fractures.

Authors:  Krister P Freese; L Wade Faulk; Claire Palmer; Robin M Baschal; Sarah E Sibbel
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 2.586

View more
  2 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: What Is the Normal Ulnar Bow in Adult Patients?

Authors:  Betsy M Nolan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Computer tomographic analysis of anatomic characteristics of the ulna - essential parameters for preshaped implants.

Authors:  Johannes Christof Hopf; Andreas Jähnig; Tobias Jorg; Ruben Sebastian Westphal; Daniel Wagner; Pol Maria Rommens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.