Literature DB >> 1727932

Angular deformities and forearm function.

A Sarmiento1, E Ebramzadeh, D Brys, R Tarr.   

Abstract

Angular deformities were created in cadaver forearms at proximal, middle, and distal third levels of the radius and ulna separately, and at middle and distal third levels of both bones, to determine the corresponding limitations of pronation and supination. The ranges of pronation and supination were recorded using a rotational motion measurement apparatus instrumented with a 360 degrees goniometer. These experimental results were compared to data obtained from clinical and radiographic examination of 105 patients with similar residual deformities following treatment of fractures by nonsurgical means, to evaluate the accuracy of the experimental model and to determine if loss of rotational motion could be predicted based on radiographic findings. With cadaver forearms, on the average, angulation of 10 degrees of the radius or ulna in coronal or sagittal planes limited pronation and supination by less than 24 degrees, whereas angulation of 10 degrees of both the radius and the ulna limited pronation and supination by less than 18%. Comparison of experimental results with clinical findings showed that, despite the errors involved in measuring forearm deformities in patients using biplanar radiographs, the experimental results predicted the clinical loss of pronation and supination to within 17% for the fractures of the radius, and within 8% accuracy for the fractures of the ulna.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1727932     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100100115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  15 in total

1.  Correction of forearm malunion guided by the preoperative complaint.

Authors:  Ladislav Nagy; Linas Jankauskas; Charles E Dumont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Fractures of the radius and ulna in adults: an analysis of factors affecting outcome.

Authors:  F C Wilson; D R Dirschl; D K Bynum
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  1997

3.  Failures and complications in intramedullary nailing of children's forearm fractures.

Authors:  F F Fernandez; M Langendörfer; T Wirth; O Eberhardt
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  Nonoperative treatment of both-bone forearm shaft fractures in children: predictors of early radiographic failure.

Authors:  Eric N Bowman; Charles T Mehlman; Christopher J Lindsell; Junichi Tamai
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

Review 5.  [Surgical correction of the upper and lower arm of children].

Authors:  L Von Laer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Prebending of a titanium elastic intramedullary nail in the treatment of distal radius fractures in children.

Authors:  Haoqi Cai; Zhigang Wang; Haiqing Cai
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 May-Jun

7.  Does operative fixation of isolated fractures of ulna shaft results in different outcomes than non-operative management by long arm cast?

Authors:  Altaf Hussain; Sandeep Kumar Nema; Deep Sharma; Sujiv Akkilagunta; Gopisankar Balaji
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-12-21

8.  Rapid prototyping in orthopaedic surgery: a user's guide.

Authors:  Mark Frame; James S Huntley
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-05-01

9.  What Is the Normal Ulnar Bow in Adult Patients?

Authors:  Jeremy Hreha; Dominick V Congiusta; Irfan H Ahmed; Michael M Vosbikian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 10.  Reconstruction of malunited diaphyseal fractures of the forearm.

Authors:  Prakash Jayakumar; Jesse B Jupiter
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2014-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.