Literature DB >> 12499969

How does torsional deformity of the radial shaft influence the rotation of the forearm? A biomechanical study.

Philip Kasten1, Mathias Krefft, Jürgen Hesselbach, Annelie M Weinberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this experimental study was to measure the exact influence of isolated torsional deformities at the middle third of the radial shaft on the rotation of the forearm.
DESIGN: Biomechanical study in cadavers.
SETTING: Trauma Surgery Research Laboratories at the Medical School of Hannover, Hannover, Germany. INTERVENTION: Fourteen intact and fresh cadaver specimens were fixed in a newly developed apparatus that allowed free pronation and supination. A ring fixator was applied to the radial shaft with K-wires that allowed us to stabilize torsional deformities in steps of 10 degrees. The middle of the radial shaft was osteotomized via a small soft tissue window, leaving the other soft tissues, including the interosseous membrane, intact. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Supination and pronation were measured using a goniometer in a standardized fashion.
RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) supination value before osteotomy of the radius was 71.6 degrees (15.2 degrees), and the mean (standard deviation) pronation value was 64.5 degrees (12.4 degrees). Radial osteotomy caused no significant difference in the range of motion before creation of torsional deformities. Supination torsional deformities >30 degrees showed a significant loss of pronation. In turn, pronation torsional deformities >30 degrees resulted in a significant loss of supination. The amount of mean rotational loss was approximately the same in the respective pronation and supination torsional deformities.
CONCLUSION: An axial torsional deformity of the radius of >30 degrees causes a statistically significant loss of forearm rotation in fresh cadavers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12499969     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200301000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  9 in total

1.  Correction of forearm malunion guided by the preoperative complaint.

Authors:  Ladislav Nagy; Linas Jankauskas; Charles E Dumont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  [Posttraumatic torsional deformities of the forearm : Methods of measurement and decision guidelines for correction].

Authors:  R D Blossey; C Krettek; E Liodakis
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  [Pro- and supination impairments due to torsional deformities of the radial diaphysis before and after ulna osteotomy].

Authors:  P Kasten; M Krefft; S Schneider; J Hesselbach; A-M Weinberg
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  CORR Insights®: What Is the Normal Ulnar Bow in Adult Patients?

Authors:  Betsy M Nolan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Predictive factors for re-displacement in diaphyseal forearm fractures in children-role of radiographic indices.

Authors:  Shadi Asadollahi; Masoumeh Pourali; Kamran Heidari
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Delayed Treatment of a Galeazzi Fracture Using an External Ring Fixator.

Authors:  Christian Konrads; Thomas Schewior
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2020 May-Jun

7.  What Is the Normal Ulnar Bow in Adult Patients?

Authors:  Jeremy Hreha; Dominick V Congiusta; Irfan H Ahmed; Michael M Vosbikian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 8.  Reconstruction of malunited diaphyseal fractures of the forearm.

Authors:  Prakash Jayakumar; Jesse B Jupiter
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2014-09

9.  Measurement of Malrotation on Direct Radiography in Pediatric Distal Radius Fractures: Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Tahir Mutlu Duymus; Serhat Mutlu; Baran Komur; Harun Mutlu; Bulent Yucel; Atilla Sancar Parmaksizoglu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.889

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.