Literature DB >> 31662547

Diverting Stoma Versus No Diversion in Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection: A Single-center Retrospective Study in Japan.

Liming Wang1, Yasumitsu Hirano2, Toshimasa Ishii2, Hiroka Kondo2, Kiyoka Hara2, Nao Obara2, Pauleon Tan2, Shigeki Yamaguchi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: The purpose of this retrospective study was to describe the benefits and risks of a diverting stoma (DS) in laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 140 and 167 patients without and with DS, respectively, were included in this study in a high-volume cancer center of Japan within an 8-year period.
RESULTS: Small bowel obstruction occurred more frequently in patients with DS (2.86% vs. 16.17%, p<0.001). The difference in anastomotic leakage rate was not statistically significant (11.43% vs. 10.18%, p=0.72). In multivariate analysis, the operating time was associated with a higher rate of leakage in LAR [odds ratio (OR) 8.772, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.002-1.012, p=0.027].
CONCLUSION: Operating time was associated with a higher rate of leakage in LAR for low rectal cancer. A DS did not reduce anastomotic leakage but increased the risk of postoperative intestinal obstruction in laparoscopic LAR. Copyright
© 2019, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic low anterior resection; anastomotic leakage; diverting stoma

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31662547      PMCID: PMC6899151          DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vivo        ISSN: 0258-851X            Impact factor:   2.155


  30 in total

Review 1.  Oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  I Mantzoros
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Risk factors and clinical outcome for anastomotic leakage after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Won-Suk Lee; Seong Hyeon Yun; Young-Nam Roh; Hae-Ran Yun; Woo Yong Lee; Yong Beom Cho; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Endoscopic evaluation of clinical colorectal anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  Tetsuo Ikeda; Ryuichi Kumashiro; Kenji Taketani; Koji Ando; Yasue Kimura; Hiroshi Saeki; Eiji Oki; Masaru Morita; Tomohiko Akahoshi; Makoto Hashizume; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Usefulness of transanal tube placement for prevention of anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic low anterior resection.

Authors:  Tetsuo Ito; Kazutaka Obama; Teruyuki Sato; Koichi Matsuo; Hidenobu Inoue; Keiko Kubota; Nobuyuki Tamaki; Kazuhiro Kami; Naoki Yoshimura; Takahito Shono; Eiji Yamamoto; Taisuke Morimoto
Journal:  Asian J Endosc Surg       Date:  2016-07-26

5.  The Use of a Circular Side Stapling Technique in Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: Experience of 30 Serial Cases.

Authors:  Eiji Oki; Koji Ando; Hiroshi Saeki; Yuichiro Nakashima; Yasue Kimura; Yukiharu Hiyoshi; Yu Imamura; Kippei Ohgaki; Shuhei Ito; Masaru Morita; Tetsuo Ikeda; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-01-15

6.  Safety and efficacy of low anterior resection for rectal cancer: 681 consecutive cases from a specialty service.

Authors:  W E Enker; N Merchant; A M Cohen; N M Lanouette; C Swallow; J Guillem; P Paty; B Minsky; K Weyrauch; S H Quan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Mirnezami; Reza Mirnezami; Kandiah Chandrakumaran; Kishore Sasapu; Peter Sagar; Paul Finan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors.

Authors:  C A Bertelsen; A H Andreasen; T Jørgensen; H Harling
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Rectal cancer patients' quality of life with a temporary stoma: shifting perspectives.

Authors:  Heather B Neuman; Jason Park; Sarah Fuzesi; Larissa K Temple
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Male sex and history of ischemic heart disease are major risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Seiichi Shinji; Yoshibumi Ueda; Takeshi Yamada; Michihiro Koizumi; Yasuyuki Yokoyama; Goro Takahashi; Masahiro Hotta; Takuma Iwai; Keisuke Hara; Kohki Takeda; Mikihiro Okusa; Hayato Kan; Eiji Uchida; Hiroshi Yoshida
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  4 in total

1.  Morbidity of Temporary Loop Ileostomy in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Arun Peter Mathew; Srinidhi M; Chandramohan K; Madhu Muralee; Mira Wagh
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-18

2.  Risk Factors for Stoma Outlet Obstruction: Preventing This Complication after Construction of Diverting Ileostomy during Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Kiyomitsu Kuwahara; Yasuji Mokuno; Hideo Matsubara; Masahito Uji; Ichiro Kobayashi; Shinsuke Iyomasa
Journal:  JMA J       Date:  2022-03-04

3.  Persistent Descending Mesocolon as a Key Risk Factor in Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Liming Wang; Hiroka Kondo; Yasumitsu Hirano; Toshimasa Ishii; Kiyoka Hara; Nao Obara; Masahiro Asari; Takuya Kato; Gregory Heng; Shigeki Yamaguchi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Protective ileostomy does not prevent anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Lei Niu; Jin Wang; Peng Zhang; Xiaomu Zhao
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.671

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.