Literature DB >> 10522724

Safety and efficacy of low anterior resection for rectal cancer: 681 consecutive cases from a specialty service.

W E Enker1, N Merchant, A M Cohen, N M Lanouette, C Swallow, J Guillem, P Paty, B Minsky, K Weyrauch, S H Quan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine perioperative morbidity, survival, and local failure rates in a large group of consecutive patients with rectal cancer undergoing low anterior resection by multiple surgeons on a specialty service. The primary objective was to assess the surgical complications associated with preoperative radiation sequencing. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The goals in the treatment of rectal cancer are cure, local control, and preservation of sphincter, sexual, and bladder function. Surgical resection using sharp perimesorectal dissection is important for achieving these goals. The complications and mortality rate of this surgical strategy, particularly in the setting of preoperative chemoradiation, have not been well defined.
METHODS: There were 1233 patients with primary rectal cancer treated at the authors' cancer center from 1987 to 1995. Of these, 681 underwent low anterior resection and/or coloanal anastomosis for primary rectal cancer. The surgical technique used the principles of sharp perimesorectal excision. Morbidity and mortality rates were compared between patients receiving preoperative chemoradiation (Preop RT, n = 150) and those not receiving preoperative chemoradiation (No Preop RT, n = 531). Recurrence and survival data were determined in patients undergoing curative resection (n = 583, 86%) among three groups of patients: those receiving Preop RT (n = 131), those receiving postoperative chemoradiation (Postop RT, n = 110), and those receiving no radiation therapy (No RT, n = 342).
RESULTS: The perioperative mortality rate was 0.6% (4/681). Postoperative complications occurred in 22% (153/681). The operative time, estimated blood loss, and rate of pelvic abscess formation without associated leak were higher in the Preop RT group than the No Preop RT group. However, the overall complication rate, rate of wound infection, anastomotic leak, and length of hospital stay were no different between Preop RT and No Preop RT patients. With a median follow-up of 45.6 months, the overall actuarial 5-year recurrence rate for patients undergoing curative resection (n = 583) was 19%, with 4% having local recurrence only, 12% having distant recurrence, and 3% having both local and distant recurrence, for an overall local recurrence rate of 7%. The actuarial 5-year overall survival rate was 81%; the disease-free survival rate was 75% and the local recurrence rate was 10%. The overall survival rate was similar between Preop RT (85%), Postop RT (72%), and No RT (83%) patients (p = 0.10), whereas the disease-free survival rate was significantly worse for Postop RT (65%) patients compared with Preop RT (79%) and No RT (77%) patients (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSION: The use of preoperative chemoradiation results in increased operative time, blood loss, and pelvic abscess formation but does not increase the rate of anastomotic leaks or the length of hospital stay after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. The 5-year actuarial overall survival rate for patients undergoing curative resection exceeded 80%, with a local recurrence rate of 10%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10522724      PMCID: PMC1420903          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199910000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  31 in total

1.  Pre- or postoperative radiotherapy in rectal and rectosigmoid carcinoma. Report from a randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  L Påhlman; B Glimelius
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Preoperative short-term radiation therapy in operable rectal carcinoma. A prospective randomized trial. Stockholm Rectal Cancer Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  R J Heald; R D Ryall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-06-28       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Intestinal anastomosis after preoperative radiation therapy for carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  P Friedmann; J L Garb; D P McCabe; J R Chabot; W C Park; A Stark; N P Coe; D W Page
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1987-03

5.  Resectable adenocarcinoma of the rectosigmoid and rectum. I. Patterns of failure and survival.

Authors:  B D Minsky; C Mies; A Recht; T A Rich; J T Chaffey
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Enhanced survival of patients with colon and rectal cancer is based upon wide anatomic resection.

Authors:  W E Enker; U T Laffer; G E Block
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Prolongation of the disease-free interval in surgically treated rectal carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-06-06       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?

Authors:  R J Heald; E M Husband; R D Ryall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J E Krook; C G Moertel; L L Gunderson; H S Wieand; R T Collins; R W Beart; T P Kubista; M A Poon; W C Meyers; J A Mailliard
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision.

Authors:  P Quirke; P Durdey; M F Dixon; N S Williams
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-11-01       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  78 in total

1.  A NSQIP Review of Major Morbidity and Mortality of Synchronous Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastasis Stratified by Extent of Liver Resection and Type of Colorectal Resection.

Authors:  Christopher R Shubert; Elizabeth B Habermann; John R Bergquist; Cornelius A Thiels; Kristine M Thomsen; Walter K Kremers; Michael L Kendrick; Robert R Cima; David M Nagorney
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Implementing a standard protocol to decrease the incidence of surgical site infections in rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Minako Kobayashi; Yasuhiro Inoue; Yasuhiko Mohri; Chikao Miki; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Elective colon and rectal surgery differ in risk factors for wound infection: results of prospective surveillance.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Konishi; Toshiaki Watanabe; Junji Kishimoto; Hirokazu Nagawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer with preoperative chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Masatoshi Oya; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Meiki Fukuda; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Masashi Ueno; Toshiharu Yamaguchi; Tetsuichiro Muto
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  The impact of new technology on surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  G B Makin; D J Breen; J R Monson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Local recurrence and survival after laparoscopic mesorectal resection forrectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  E C Poulin; C M Schlachta; R Grégoire; P Seshadri; M O Cadeddu; J Mamazza
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Study protocol for a multicenter prospective controlled and randomized trial of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic low anterior resection in rectal cancer.

Authors:  X Serra-Aracil; A Zárate; L Mora; S Serra-Pla; A Pallisera; J Bonfill; J Bargalló; A Pando; S Delgado; E Balleteros; C Pericay
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Reoperation for anastomotic failure.

Authors:  Zuri A Murrell; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-11

9.  Prognostic factors affecting oncologic outcomes in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer: impact of patterns of pelvic recurrence on curative resection.

Authors:  Jea-Kun Park; Young-Wan Kim; Hyuk Hur; Nam-Kyu Kim; Byung-Soh Min; Seung-Kook Sohn; Young-Deuk Choi; Young-Tae Kim; Jung-Bai Ahn; Jae-Kyung Roh; Ki-Chang Keum; Jin-Sil Seong
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Factors related to preoperative assessment of the circumferential resection margin and the extent of mesorectal invasion by magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer: a prospective comparison study.

Authors:  Young-Wan Kim; Seung-Whan Cha; Juyon Pyo; Nam-Kyu Kim; Byung-Soh Min; Myeong-Jin Kim; Hoguen Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.