Literature DB >> 25590136

The Use of a Circular Side Stapling Technique in Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: Experience of 30 Serial Cases.

Eiji Oki1, Koji Ando1, Hiroshi Saeki1, Yuichiro Nakashima1, Yasue Kimura1, Yukiharu Hiyoshi1, Yu Imamura1, Kippei Ohgaki1, Shuhei Ito1, Masaru Morita1, Tetsuo Ikeda1, Yoshihiko Maehara1.   

Abstract

The double-stapling technique using a circular stapler (CS) to create an end-to-end anastomosis is currently used widely in laparoscopic-assisted rectal surgery. However, a high rate of anastomotic failure has been reported. We report new side-to-side anastomosis creation using a CS, the so-called circular side stapling technique (CST). After excising the rectum at the oral and anal sides of the tumor with a linear stapler, a side-to-side colorectal anastomosis was made on the anterior wall of the rectosigmoid colon and the anterior or posterior wall of the rectum with a CS. Between 2012 and 2013, we recorded 30 serial cases of rectal-sigmoid or rectal cancer that were treated with laparoscopic-assisted surgeries using this method. In the 30 cases, the mean age was 68 ± 12 years, operating time was 288 ± 80 minutes, and blood loss was 66 ± 67 mL. None of the patients suffered from anastomosis leakage or postoperative anastomotic bleeding, and none complained of their stool habits. Three months after the last surgery in this cohort, no anastomosis strictures were reported. Based on these results, we propose an alternative method of side-to-side anastomosis for low anterior resection by using a CS to prevent staple overlap. Our experience indicates that the CST is easy and safe. Therefore, this method is a useful alternative to the current method used in laparoscopic surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Circular stapler; Colorectal cancer; Laparoscopy; Low anterior resection

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25590136      PMCID: PMC4587526          DOI: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00202.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Surg        ISSN: 0020-8868


  14 in total

Review 1.  Anatomy of the lateral ligaments of the rectum: a controversial point of view.

Authors:  Guo-Jun Wang; Chun-Fang Gao; Dong Wei; Cun Wang; Wen-Jian Meng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Complications in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: results of a multicentre trial.

Authors:  J Rose; C Schneider; C Yildirim; P Geers; H Scheidbach; F Köckerling
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Circular stapling techniques for low anterior resection of rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  K Miller; E Moritz
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug

4.  Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients.

Authors:  A Vignali; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; J W Milsom; J M Church; T L Hull; S A Strong; J R Oakley
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients.

Authors:  Chien Yuh Yeh; Chung Rong Changchien; Jeng-Yi Wang; Jinn-Shiun Chen; Hong Hwa Chen; Jy-Ming Chiang; Reiping Tang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Reduction of anastomotic failure in laparoscopic colorectal surgery using antitraction sutures.

Authors:  Ralph P M Gadiot; Michalda S Dunker; Amir Mearadji; Guido H H Mannaerts
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomes.

Authors:  J Leroy; F Jamali; L Forbes; M Smith; F Rubino; D Mutter; J Marescaux
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  5 in total

1.  New Anastomosis Technique to Prevent Anastomotic Leakage in Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer, Especially Upper Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Koji Ando; Naotaka Kuriyama; Yoshiaki Fujimoto; Tomoko Jogo; Kentaro Hokonohara; Qingjiang Hu; Yuichi Hisamatsu; Ryota Nakanishi; Yuichiro Nakashima; Yasue Kimura; Eiji Oki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Diverting Stoma Versus No Diversion in Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection: A Single-center Retrospective Study in Japan.

Authors:  Liming Wang; Yasumitsu Hirano; Toshimasa Ishii; Hiroka Kondo; Kiyoka Hara; Nao Obara; Pauleon Tan; Shigeki Yamaguchi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Laparoscopic assisted low anterior resection for advanced rectal cancer in a kidney transplant recipient: A case report.

Authors:  Zenan Xia; Weijie Chen; Ru Yao; Guole Lin; Huizhong Qiu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Clinical impact of the triple-layered circular stapler for reducing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Porcine model and multicenter retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Ryota Nakanishi; Yoshiaki Fujimoto; Masahiko Sugiyama; Yuichi Hisamatsu; Tomonori Nakanoko; Koji Ando; Mitsuhiko Ota; Yasue Kimura; Eiji Oki; Tomoharu Yoshizumi
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-10-07

Review 5.  Use of a disposable circumcision suture device versus conventional circumcision: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhong-Chao Huo; Gang Liu; Xiao-Yan Li; Fei Liu; Wen-Ju Fan; Ru-Hua Guan; Pei-Feng Li; De-Yang Mo; Yong-Zhi He
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.