| Literature DB >> 31661038 |
Marta Marquié1,2, Cinthya Agüero1,2, Ana C Amaral1,2, Alberto Villarejo-Galende3, Prianca Ramanan1,2, Michael Siao Tick Chong1,2, Nil Sáez-Calveras1,2, Rachel E Bennett1,2, Eline E Verwer4, Sally Ji Who Kim4, Maeva Dhaynaut4,5, Victor E Alvarez6,7,8, Keith A Johnson4, Ann C McKee6,7,8, Matthew P Frosch1,2,9, Teresa Gómez-Isla10,11.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a tauopathy associated to repetitive head trauma. There are no validated in vivo biomarkers of CTE and a definite diagnosis can only be made at autopsy. Recent studies have shown that positron emission tomography (PET) tracer AV-1451 (Flortaucipir) exhibits high binding affinity for paired helical filament (PHF)-tau aggregates in Alzheimer (AD) brains but relatively low affinity for tau lesions in other tauopathies like temporal lobal degeneration (FTLD)-tau, progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) or corticobasal degeneration (CBD). Little is known, however, about the binding profile of this ligand to the tau-containing lesions of CTE.Entities:
Keywords: Autoradiography; Chronic traumatic encephalopathy; Flortaucipir; PET; Tau; [18F]-AV-1451
Year: 2019 PMID: 31661038 PMCID: PMC6816221 DOI: 10.1186/s40478-019-0808-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun ISSN: 2051-5960 Impact factor: 7.801
Table 1 Demographic and neuropathologic characteristics
| Case N° | Pathological diagnosis | Age at death (years) | Gender | Braak & Braak (NFTs) | CERAD score (neuritic plaques) | NIA-Reagan Institute criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CTE (CTE stage III) | 46 | M | III | none | LP |
| 2 | CTE (CTE stage IV) | 65 | M | II | A | LP |
| 3 | CTE (CTE stage III) | 56 | M | II | none | LP |
| 4 | CTE (CTE stage II-III) | 25 | M | 0 | none | LP |
| 5 | CTE (CTE stage III) | 58 | M | III | none | LP |
| 6 | AD | 87 | F | V | Frequent | IP |
| 7 | AD | 71 | M | V | Moderate | IP |
| 8 | AD | 96 | F | V | Frequent | HP |
| 9 | AD | 82 | F | V | Moderate | HP |
| 10 | AD | 79 | M | V | Frequent | HP |
| 11 | AD | 66 | M | V | Moderate | HP |
| 12 | AD | 69 | F | VI | Frequent | HP |
| 13 | AD | 66 | F | VI | Frequent | HP |
| 14 | AD | 66 | F | VI | Frequent | HP |
| 15 | CTL | 76 | F | I | Sparse | LP |
| 16 | CTL | 97 | F | I | Sparse | LP |
| 17 | CTL | 81 | M | I | none | LP |
| 18 | CTL | 59 | F | I-II | Moderate | LP |
| 19 | CTL | 91 | M | II | none | LP |
| 20 | CTL | 101 | F | II | Moderate | LP |
Abbreviations: CTE Chronic traumatic encephalopahty, AD Alzheimer’s disease, CERAD Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer´s Disease, CTL Control, F Female, HP High probability of AD, IP Intermediate probability of AD, LP Low probability of AD, M Male, NFT Neurofibrillary tangles, NIA National Institute of Ageing
Fig. 1Representative images of immunohistochemistry with PHF-1 antibody (panel a), [18F]-AV-1451 phosphor screen autoradiography (panel b), self-block (panel c), and [18F]-AV-1451 nuclear emulsion autoradiography followed by PHF-1 immunostaining in AD (positive control) and CTE brains (panels d and e). A strong [18F]-AV-1451 binding signal was observed in cortical regions containing tangles in AD (panels a and b arrows). No [18F]-AV-1451 binding was detected in CTE slices containing abundant tau aggregates (panel a arrowheads) with the exception of strong binding to the choroid plexus in case#1 and to leptomeninges in cases #1 and #3 (panel b red stars) corresponding to off-target to leptomeningeal melanocytes. A weaker signal was present in hippocampus of case #2 (panel b arrow) where scarce classic AD NFTs (panel a arrow) were present along with abundant CTE tau aggregates (panel a arrowhead). The signal was blocked by adding unlabeled AV-1451 (panel c). [18F]-AV-1451 nuclear emulsion autoradiography confirmed a strong accumulation of silver grains colocalizing with classic NFTs in AD (panel d), and with incidental classic NFTs in the hippocampus of CTE case #2 (panel e). No detectable accumulations of silver grains were observed in association with CTE tau aggregates (panel d). Strong accumulation of silver grains also colocalized with leptomeningeal melanocytes in CTE cases #1 and #3 (off-target binding) (panel e). Scale bars = 1 cm (panels a, b, c) and 20 μm (panels d and e)
Fig. 2Representative images of phosphor screen autoradiography experiments with and without ethanol washing steps. Identical results were observed in the head to head comparison of both protocols using adjacent brain tissue slices. A strong [18F]-AV-1451 binding signal was observed in cortical regions containing tangles in AD but no [18F]-AV-1451 binding was detected in CTE slices with the exception of the off-target to leptomeningeal melanocytes. Scale bar = 1 cm
Fig. 3Representative images of Western Blot membranes probed with total tau (a) and PHF-1 (c) antibodies showing lower amounts of p-tau monomers and oligomers in CTE compared to AD brain samples. Significant correlations were found between total tau burden quantified on immunostained sections and levels of tau oligomers (b) and p-tau monomers and oligomers in CTE cases (d). Spearman r and p values are displayed on the graphs. Abbreviations: HPC: hipoccampus; FC: frontal cortex; TC: temporal cortex; PC: parietal cortex; OC: occipital cortex
Fig. 4Representative confocal microscopy images showing tau aggregates in cells exposed to AD and CTE temporal cortex brain lysates (white arrow heads). No aggregates where detected in cells exposed to temporal cortex brain lysates from controls free of tau pathology (a). Quantification of IFD in ROIs from controls (n = 6), CTE (n = 5) and AD (n = 9) brain samples. IFD was significantly higher in AD than in CTE and control samples (p = 0.0009) (b). IFD values showed a significant correlation with total tau burden quantified by IHC (c) and with total levels tau oligomers (e), p-tau monomers (f) and p-tau monomers (g) but not with total tau monomers (d). Spearman r and p values are displayed on the graphs. Abbreviations: HPC: hipoccampus; FC: frontal cortex; TC: temporal cortex; PC: parietal cortex; OC: occipital cortex; IFD: integrated FRET density; IHC: immunohistochemistry. Scale bar = 100 μm