Rik Ossenkoppele1,2, Gil D Rabinovici3, Ruben Smith1, Hanna Cho4, Michael Schöll1,5, Olof Strandberg1, Sebastian Palmqvist1, Niklas Mattsson1,6, Shorena Janelidze1, Alexander Santillo1, Tomas Ohlsson7, Jonas Jögi8, Richard Tsai3, Renaud La Joie3, Joel Kramer3, Adam L Boxer3, Maria L Gorno-Tempini3, Bruce L Miller3, Jae Y Choi9,10, Young H Ryu9, Chul H Lyoo4, Oskar Hansson1,6. 1. Lund University, Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund, Sweden. 2. VU University Medical Center, Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 3. Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco. 4. Department of Neurology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. 5. Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine and the Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. 6. Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden. 7. Skåne University Hospital, Department of Radiation Physics, Lund, Sweden. 8. Skåne University Hospital, Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Lund, Sweden. 9. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. 10. Division of RI-Convergence Research, Korea Institute Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, South Korea.
Abstract
Importance: The positron emission tomography (PET) tracer [18F]flortaucipir allows in vivo quantification of paired helical filament tau, a core neuropathological feature of Alzheimer disease (AD), but its diagnostic utility is unclear. Objective: To examine the discriminative accuracy of [18F]flortaucipir for AD vs non-AD neurodegenerative disorders. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, 719 participants were recruited from 3 dementia centers in South Korea, Sweden, and the United States between June 2014 and November 2017 (160 cognitively normal controls, 126 patients with mild cognitive impairment [MCI], of whom 65.9% were amyloid-β [Aβ] positive [ie, MCI due to AD], 179 patients with AD dementia, and 254 patients with various non-AD neurodegenerative disorders). Exposures: The index test was the [18F]flortaucipir PET standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) in 5 predefined regions of interest (ROIs). Cut points for tau positivity were determined using the mean +2 SDs observed in controls and Youden Index for the contrast AD dementia vs controls. Main Outcomes and Measures: The reference standard was the clinical diagnosis determined at the specialized memory centers. In the primary analysis, the discriminative accuracy (ie, sensitivity and specificity) of [18F]flortaucipir was examined for AD dementia vs all non-AD neurodegenerative disorders. In secondary analyses, the area under the curve (AUC) of [18F]flortaucipir SUVR was compared with 3 established magnetic resonance imaging measures (hippocampal volumes and AD signature and whole-brain cortical thickness), and sensitivity and specificity of [18F]flortaucipir in MCI due to AD vs non-AD neurodegenerative disorders were determined. Results: Among 719 participants, the overall mean (SD) age was 68.8 (9.2) years and 48.4% were male. The proportions of patients who were amyloid-β positive were 26.3%, 65.9%, 100%, and 23.8% among cognitively normal controls, patients with MCI, patients with AD dementia, and patients with non-AD neurodegenerative disorders, respectively. [18F]flortaucipir uptake in the medial-basal and lateral temporal cortex showed 89.9% (95% CI, 84.6%-93.9%) sensitivity and 90.6% (95% CI, 86.3%-93.9%) specificity using the threshold based on controls (SUVR, 1.34), and 96.8% (95% CI, 92.0%-99.1%) sensitivity and 87.9% (95% CI, 81.9%-92.4%) specificity using the Youden Index-derived cutoff (SUVR, 1.27) for distinguishing AD dementia from all non-AD neurodegenerative disorders. The AUCs for all 5 [18F]flortaucipir ROIs were higher (AUC range, 0.92-0.95) compared with the 3 volumetric MRI measures (AUC range, 0.63-0.75; all ROIs P < .001). Diagnostic performance of the 5 [18F]flortaucipir ROIs were lower in MCI due to AD (AUC range, 0.75-0.84). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with established diagnoses at a memory disorder clinic, [18F]flortaucipir PET was able to discriminate AD from other neurodegenerative diseases. The accuracy and potential utility of this test in patient care require further research in clinically more representative populations.
Importance: The positron emission tomography (PET) tracer [18F]flortaucipir allows in vivo quantification of paired helical filament tau, a core neuropathological feature of Alzheimer disease (AD), but its diagnostic utility is unclear. Objective: To examine the discriminative accuracy of [18F]flortaucipir for AD vs non-AD neurodegenerative disorders. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, 719 participants were recruited from 3 dementia centers in South Korea, Sweden, and the United States between June 2014 and November 2017 (160 cognitively normal controls, 126 patients with mild cognitive impairment [MCI], of whom 65.9% were amyloid-β [Aβ] positive [ie, MCI due to AD], 179 patients with AD dementia, and 254 patients with various non-AD neurodegenerative disorders). Exposures: The index test was the [18F]flortaucipir PET standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) in 5 predefined regions of interest (ROIs). Cut points for tau positivity were determined using the mean +2 SDs observed in controls and Youden Index for the contrast AD dementia vs controls. Main Outcomes and Measures: The reference standard was the clinical diagnosis determined at the specialized memory centers. In the primary analysis, the discriminative accuracy (ie, sensitivity and specificity) of [18F]flortaucipir was examined for AD dementia vs all non-AD neurodegenerative disorders. In secondary analyses, the area under the curve (AUC) of [18F]flortaucipir SUVR was compared with 3 established magnetic resonance imaging measures (hippocampal volumes and AD signature and whole-brain cortical thickness), and sensitivity and specificity of [18F]flortaucipir in MCI due to AD vs non-AD neurodegenerative disorders were determined. Results: Among 719 participants, the overall mean (SD) age was 68.8 (9.2) years and 48.4% were male. The proportions of patients who were amyloid-β positive were 26.3%, 65.9%, 100%, and 23.8% among cognitively normal controls, patients with MCI, patients with AD dementia, and patients with non-AD neurodegenerative disorders, respectively. [18F]flortaucipir uptake in the medial-basal and lateral temporal cortex showed 89.9% (95% CI, 84.6%-93.9%) sensitivity and 90.6% (95% CI, 86.3%-93.9%) specificity using the threshold based on controls (SUVR, 1.34), and 96.8% (95% CI, 92.0%-99.1%) sensitivity and 87.9% (95% CI, 81.9%-92.4%) specificity using the Youden Index-derived cutoff (SUVR, 1.27) for distinguishing AD dementia from all non-AD neurodegenerative disorders. The AUCs for all 5 [18F]flortaucipir ROIs were higher (AUC range, 0.92-0.95) compared with the 3 volumetric MRI measures (AUC range, 0.63-0.75; all ROIs P < .001). Diagnostic performance of the 5 [18F]flortaucipir ROIs were lower in MCI due to AD (AUC range, 0.75-0.84). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with established diagnoses at a memory disorder clinic, [18F]flortaucipir PET was able to discriminate AD from other neurodegenerative diseases. The accuracy and potential utility of this test in patient care require further research in clinically more representative populations.
Authors: Panagiotis Alexopoulos; Laura Kriett; Bernhard Haller; Elisabeth Klupp; Katherine Gray; Timo Grimmer; Nikolaos Laskaris; Stefan Förster; Robert Perneczky; Alexander Kurz; Alexander Drzezga; Andreas Fellgiebel; Igor Yakushev Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2014-05-22 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Bernard J Hanseeuw; Rebecca A Betensky; Aaron P Schultz; Kathryn V Papp; Elizabeth C Mormino; Jorge Sepulcre; John S Bark; Danielle M Cosio; Molly LaPoint; Jasmeer P Chhatwal; Dorene M Rentz; Reisa A Sperling; Keith A Johnson Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2017-04-06 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Peter T Nelson; Irina Alafuzoff; Eileen H Bigio; Constantin Bouras; Heiko Braak; Nigel J Cairns; Rudolph J Castellani; Barbara J Crain; Peter Davies; Kelly Del Tredici; Charles Duyckaerts; Matthew P Frosch; Vahram Haroutunian; Patrick R Hof; Christine M Hulette; Bradley T Hyman; Takeshi Iwatsubo; Kurt A Jellinger; Gregory A Jicha; Enikö Kövari; Walter A Kukull; James B Leverenz; Seth Love; Ian R Mackenzie; David M Mann; Eliezer Masliah; Ann C McKee; Thomas J Montine; John C Morris; Julie A Schneider; Joshua A Sonnen; Dietmar R Thal; John Q Trojanowski; Juan C Troncoso; Thomas Wisniewski; Randall L Woltjer; Thomas G Beach Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: Michael Schöll; Rik Ossenkoppele; Olof Strandberg; Sebastian Palmqvist; Jonas Jögi; Tomas Ohlsson; Ruben Smith; Oskar Hansson Journal: Brain Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Daniel R Schonhaut; Corey T McMillan; Salvatore Spina; Bradford C Dickerson; Andrew Siderowf; Michael D Devous; Richard Tsai; Joseph Winer; David S Russell; Irene Litvan; Erik D Roberson; William W Seeley; Lea T Grinberg; Joel H Kramer; Bruce L Miller; Peter Pressman; Ilya Nasrallah; Suzanne L Baker; Stephen N Gomperts; Keith A Johnson; Murray Grossman; William J Jagust; Adam L Boxer; Gil D Rabinovici Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Keith A Johnson; Aaron Schultz; Rebecca A Betensky; J Alex Becker; Jorge Sepulcre; Dorene Rentz; Elizabeth Mormino; Jasmeer Chhatwal; Rebecca Amariglio; Kate Papp; Gad Marshall; Mark Albers; Samantha Mauro; Lesley Pepin; Jonathan Alverio; Kelly Judge; Marlie Philiossaint; Timothy Shoup; Daniel Yokell; Bradford Dickerson; Teresa Gomez-Isla; Bradley Hyman; Neil Vasdev; Reisa Sperling Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Renaud La Joie; Alexandre Bejanin; Anne M Fagan; Nagehan Ayakta; Suzanne L Baker; Viktoriya Bourakova; Adam L Boxer; Jungho Cha; Anna Karydas; Gina Jerome; Anne Maass; Ashley Mensing; Zachary A Miller; James P O'Neil; Julie Pham; Howard J Rosen; Richard Tsai; Adrienne V Visani; Bruce L Miller; William J Jagust; Gil D Rabinovici Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-12-27 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Ian G McKeith; Bradley F Boeve; Dennis W Dickson; Glenda Halliday; John-Paul Taylor; Daniel Weintraub; Dag Aarsland; James Galvin; Johannes Attems; Clive G Ballard; Ashley Bayston; Thomas G Beach; Frédéric Blanc; Nicolaas Bohnen; Laura Bonanni; Jose Bras; Patrik Brundin; David Burn; Alice Chen-Plotkin; John E Duda; Omar El-Agnaf; Howard Feldman; Tanis J Ferman; Dominic Ffytche; Hiroshige Fujishiro; Douglas Galasko; Jennifer G Goldman; Stephen N Gomperts; Neill R Graff-Radford; Lawrence S Honig; Alex Iranzo; Kejal Kantarci; Daniel Kaufer; Walter Kukull; Virginia M Y Lee; James B Leverenz; Simon Lewis; Carol Lippa; Angela Lunde; Mario Masellis; Eliezer Masliah; Pamela McLean; Brit Mollenhauer; Thomas J Montine; Emilio Moreno; Etsuro Mori; Melissa Murray; John T O'Brien; Sotoshi Orimo; Ronald B Postuma; Shankar Ramaswamy; Owen A Ross; David P Salmon; Andrew Singleton; Angela Taylor; Alan Thomas; Pietro Tiraboschi; Jon B Toledo; John Q Trojanowski; Debby Tsuang; Zuzana Walker; Masahito Yamada; Kenji Kosaka Journal: Neurology Date: 2017-06-07 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Niklas Mattsson; Michael Schöll; Olof Strandberg; Ruben Smith; Sebastian Palmqvist; Philip S Insel; Douglas Hägerström; Tomas Ohlsson; Henrik Zetterberg; Jonas Jögi; Kaj Blennow; Oskar Hansson Journal: EMBO Mol Med Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 12.137
Authors: Niklas Mattsson; Ruben Smith; Olof Strandberg; Sebastian Palmqvist; Michael Schöll; Philip S Insel; Douglas Hägerström; Tomas Ohlsson; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Jonas Jögi; Oskar Hansson Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Sebastian Palmqvist; Pontus Tideman; Nicholas Cullen; Henrik Zetterberg; Kaj Blennow; Jeffery L Dage; Erik Stomrud; Shorena Janelidze; Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren; Oskar Hansson Journal: Nat Med Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Sarah A Cooley; Jeremy F Strain; Helen Beaumont; Anna H Boerwinkle; John Doyle; John C Morris; Tammie L Benzinger; Beau M Ances Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2019-06-05 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Irene Sintini; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Matthew L Senjem; Christopher G Schwarz; Mary M Machulda; Peter R Martin; David T Jones; Bradley F Boeve; David S Knopman; Kejal Kantarci; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack; Val J Lowe; Keith A Josephs; Jennifer L Whitwell Journal: Brain Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Brian A Gordon; Tyler M Blazey; Jon Christensen; Aylin Dincer; Shaney Flores; Sarah Keefe; Charles Chen; Yi Su; Eric M McDade; Guoqiao Wang; Yan Li; Jason Hassenstab; Andrew Aschenbrenner; Russ Hornbeck; Clifford R Jack; Beau M Ances; Sarah B Berman; Jared R Brosch; Douglas Galasko; Serge Gauthier; James J Lah; Mario Masellis; Christopher H van Dyck; Mark A Mintun; Gregory Klein; Smiljana Ristic; Nigel J Cairns; Daniel S Marcus; Chengjie Xiong; David M Holtzman; Marcus E Raichle; John C Morris; Randall J Bateman; Tammie L S Benzinger Journal: Brain Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Aaron M Tetreault; Tony Phan; Dana Orlando; Ilwoo Lyu; Hakmook Kang; Bennett Landman; R Ryan Darby Journal: Brain Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Alessandra Dodich; Aline Mendes; Frédéric Assal; Christian Chicherio; Barinjaka Rakotomiaramanana; Paulina Andryszak; Cristina Festari; Federica Ribaldi; Max Scheffler; Roger Schibli; Adam J Schwarz; Dina Zekry; Karl-Olof Lövblad; Marina Boccardi; Paul G Unschuld; Gabriel Gold; Giovanni B Frisoni; Valentina Garibotto Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 9.236