Lacey Loomer1, Angelo E Volandes2, Susan L Mitchell3,4, Emmanuelle Belanger1, Ellen McCreedy5, Jennifer A Palmer3, Vincent Mor1,5,6. 1. Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. 2. Section of General Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Hebrew Senior Life, Institute for Aging Research, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. 6. Providence Veterans Administration Medical Center, Center of Innovation in Health Services Research & Development Service (HSR&D), Providence, Rhode Island.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify resident characteristics associated with being offered and subsequently shown an advance care planning (ACP) video in the Pragmatic Trial of Video Education in Nursing Homes (PROVEN) and if differences are driven by within- and/or between-facility differences. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study, from March 1, 2016, to May 31, 2018. SETTING: A total of 119 PROVEN intervention nursing homes (NHs). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 43 303 new NH admissions. MEASUREMENTS: Data came from the Minimum Data Set and an electronic record documenting whether a video was offered and shown to residents. We conduct both naïve logistic regression models and hierarchical logistic models, controlling for NH fixed effects, to examine the overall differences in offer and show rate by resident characteristics. RESULTS: In naïve regression models, compared to white residents, black residents are 7.8 percentage point (pp) (95% confidence interval [CI] = -9.1 to -6.5 pp) less likely to be offered the video. These differences decrease to 1.3 pp (95% CI = -2.61 to -0.02 pp) when accounting for NH fixed effects. In fully adjusted models, black residents compared to white residents were 2.1 pp more likely to watch the video contingent on being offered (95% CI = 0.4-3.7 pp). Residents with cognitive impairment were less likely to be offered and shown the video. CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for NH fixed effects, there were smaller racial differences in being offered the video, but once offered, black residents were more likely to watch the video. This suggests that black residents are receptive to this type of ACP intervention but need to be given an opportunity to be exposed. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:603-608, 2020.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: This study aims to identify resident characteristics associated with being offered and subsequently shown an advance care planning (ACP) video in the Pragmatic Trial of Video Education in Nursing Homes (PROVEN) and if differences are driven by within- and/or between-facility differences. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study, from March 1, 2016, to May 31, 2018. SETTING: A total of 119 PROVEN intervention nursing homes (NHs). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 43 303 new NH admissions. MEASUREMENTS: Data came from the Minimum Data Set and an electronic record documenting whether a video was offered and shown to residents. We conduct both naïve logistic regression models and hierarchical logistic models, controlling for NH fixed effects, to examine the overall differences in offer and show rate by resident characteristics. RESULTS: In naïve regression models, compared to white residents, black residents are 7.8 percentage point (pp) (95% confidence interval [CI] = -9.1 to -6.5 pp) less likely to be offered the video. These differences decrease to 1.3 pp (95% CI = -2.61 to -0.02 pp) when accounting for NH fixed effects. In fully adjusted models, black residents compared to white residents were 2.1 pp more likely to watch the video contingent on being offered (95% CI = 0.4-3.7 pp). Residents with cognitive impairment were less likely to be offered and shown the video. CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for NH fixed effects, there were smaller racial differences in being offered the video, but once offered, black residents were more likely to watch the video. This suggests that black residents are receptive to this type of ACP intervention but need to be given an opportunity to be exposed. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:603-608, 2020.
Authors: Peter J Huckfeldt; Robert L Kane; Zhiyou Yang; Gabriella Engstrom; Ruth Tappen; Carolina Rojido; David Newman; Bernardo Reyes; Joseph G Ouslander Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Ellen McCreedy; Lacey Loomer; Jennifer A Palmer; Susan L Mitchell; Angelo Volandes; Vincent Mor Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2018-03-10 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Joan M Teno; Brian R Clarridge; Virginia Casey; Lisa C Welch; Terrie Wetle; Renee Shield; Vincent Mor Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-01-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jenny T van der Steen; Mirjam C van Soest-Poortvliet; Meertje Hallie-Heierman; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Luc Deliens; Marike E de Boer; Lieve Van den Block; Nicole van Uden; Cees M P M Hertogh; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2014 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Ana R Quiñones; Susan L Mitchell; Jonathan D Jackson; María P Aranda; Peggye Dilworth-Anderson; Ellen P McCarthy; Ladson Hinton Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Amber E Barnato; Gregory R Johnson; John D Birkmeyer; Jonathan S Skinner; Allistair James O'Malley; Nancy J O Birkmeyer Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 6.473