| Literature DB >> 31660274 |
Hong Zhou1,2, Yuan Ding1, Yuning Yang3, Siyu Zou1, Xueqi Qu1, Anqi Wang1,4, Xi Wang5, Yue Huang1, Xintong Li6, Xiaona Huang3, Yan Wang1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: It is controversial whether the mode of delivery is associated with developmental outcome, and little was known about growth and development of cesarean children in poor rural areas in China. We aim to measure the development of both cesarean and vaginal-delivered children by Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and explore the association between mode of delivery and developmental outcome in poor rural areas in China.Entities:
Keywords: Cesarean delivery; Delivery mode; Developmental delay
Year: 2019 PMID: 31660274 PMCID: PMC6815197 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7902
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Characteristics of children aged 1–59 months with cesarean section and vaginal delivery groups in eight counties in China (2016).
| 401(22.8) | 1,354 (77.2) | ||
| 39+0(37+0-41+6) | 39+2(37+0-41+6) | <0.001 | |
| 3,198 (1,500–4,600) | 3,187 (1,700–5,000) | 0.757 | |
| 0.601 | |||
| 1–11 | 83(20.7) | 255(18.8) | |
| 12–23 | 99(24.7) | 361(26.7) | |
| 24–59 | 219(54.6) | 738(54.5) | |
| 0.467 | |||
| Boys | 210(52.4) | 737(54.4) | |
| Girls | 191(47.6) | 617(45.6) | |
| 0.051 | |||
| 1 | 175(43.6) | 519(38.3) | |
| 2 | 169(42.1) | 580(42.8) | |
| ≥3 | 57(14.2) | 255(18.8) | |
| <0.001 | |||
| Illiteracy | 46(11.5) | 181(13.4) | |
| Primary | 80(20.0) | 334(24.7) | |
| Secondary | 224(55.9) | 757(55.9) | |
| College and above | 51(12.7) | 82(6.1) | |
| 0.219 | |||
| Yes | 24(6.1) | 60(4.6) | |
| No | 368(93.9) | 1,248(95.4) | |
| 0.080 | |||
| Poorest | 93(24.1) | 289(22.0) | |
| Poor | 50(13.0) | 246(18.7) | |
| Middle | 85(22.0) | 283(21.6) | |
| Richer | 58(15.0) | 159(12.1) | |
| Richest | 100(25.9) | 336(25.6) |
Figure 1Comparison of prevalence of suspected developmental delay in cesarean section and vaginal delivery groups in eight counties of China, 2016.
There was difference in the prevalence of overall suspected developmental delay between cesarean group (23.4%) and vaginal delivered group (21.3%), but this difference was not statistical significant (p = 0.37). Meanwhile, the rate of suspected developmental delay in cesarean group for communication, fine motor, gross motor, problem solving and personal social was 7.7%, 7.0%, 8.5%, 7.2% and 8.0%, respectively, and there was no significant difference in these five separate ASQ domains between two groups.
Socio-demographic factors for abnormal ASQ scores among children in eight counties in China (2016).
| 1,755 | 383 | 21.8(19.9–23.8) | |||
| 1–11 | 338 | 64 | 18.9(14.8–23.1) | 1 | 1 |
| 12–23 | 460 | 113 | 24.6(20.6–28.5) | 1.39(0.98–1.96) | 1.39(0.97–2.00) |
| 24–59 | 957 | 206 | 21.5(18.9–24.1) | 1.17(0.85–1.60) | 1.17(0.85–1.63) |
| Boys | 947 | 232 | 24.5(21.8–27.2) | 1.41(1.12–1.77) | 1.31(1.03–1.67) |
| Girls | 808 | 151 | 18.7(16.0–21.4) | 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 694 | 132 | 19.0(16.1–21.9) | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 749 | 170 | 22.7(19.7–25.7) | 1.25(0.96–1.61) | 1.14(0.87–1.51) |
| ≥3 | 312 | 81 | 26.0(21.1–30.8) | 1.49(1.08–2.04) | 1.31(0.93–1.83) |
| Illiteracy | 227 | 45 | 19.9(14.6–25.0) | 1.68(0.92–3.08) | 1.45(0.73–2.90) |
| Primary | 414 | 109 | 27.5(22.1–30.6) | 2.43(1.40–4.24) | 2.28(1.20–4.32) |
| Secondary | 981 | 212 | 19.6(19.0–24.2) | 1.88(1.10–3.19) | 1.88(1.02–3.46) |
| College and above | 133 | 17 | 15.9(7.1–18.5) | 1 | 1 |
| Poorest | 382 | 103 | 27.0(22.5–31.4) | 1.66(1.19–2.32) | 1.48(1.04–2.11) |
| Poor | 296 | 63 | 21.3(16.6–25.9) | 1.22(0.84–1.76) | 1.13(0.77–1.67) |
| Middle | 368 | 81 | 22.0(17.8–26.2) | 1.27(0.90–1.80) | 1.21(0.84–1.75) |
| Richer | 217 | 50 | 23.0(17.4–28.6) | 1.35(0.90–2.01) | 1.46(0.96–2.21) |
| Richest | 436 | 79 | 18.1(14.5–21.7) | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 84 | 22 | 26.2(16.8–35.6) | 1.31(0.79–2.16) | 1.37(0.82–2.29) |
| No | 1,616 | 344 | 21.3(19.3–23.3) | 1 | 1 |
| Cesarean section | 401 | 94 | 23.4(19.3–27.6) | 1.12(0.86–1.47) | 1.24(0.94–1.64) |
| Vaginal delivery | 1,354 | 289 | 21.3(19.2–23.5) | 1 | 1 |
Notes.
Adjusted for all the variables in Table 2.
p < 0.05.