Literature DB >> 31659039

Inexperienced preys know when to flee or to freeze in front of a threat.

Marie Hébert1, Elisabetta Versace1,2,3, Giorgio Vallortigara1.   

Abstract

Using appropriate antipredatory responses is crucial for survival. While slowing down reduces the chances of being detected from distant predators, fleeing away is advantageous in front of an approaching predator. Whether appropriate responses depend on experience with moving objects is still an open question. To clarify whether adopting appropriate fleeing or freezing responses requires previous experience, we investigated responses of chicks naive to movement. When exposed to the moving cues mimicking an approaching predator (a rapidly expanding, looming stimulus), chicks displayed a fast escape response. In contrast, when presented with a distal threat (a small stimulus sweeping overhead) they decreased their speed, a maneuver useful to avoid detection. The fast expansion of the stimulus toward the subject, rather than its size per se or change in luminance, triggered the escape response. These results show that young animals, in the absence of previous experience, can use motion cues to select the appropriate responses to different threats. The adaptive needs of young preys are thus matched by spontaneous defensive mechanisms that do not require learning.
Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antipredatory behaviors; defense strategies; motion cues; naive animals; threat detection

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31659039      PMCID: PMC6859328          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1915504116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  13 in total

1.  PERCEPTION OF IMPENDING COLLISION: A STUDY OF VISUALLY DIRECTED AVOIDANT BEHAVIOR.

Authors:  W SCHIFF
Journal:  Psychol Monogr       Date:  1965

2.  Faces are special for newly hatched chicks: evidence for inborn domain-specific mechanisms underlying spontaneous preferences for face-like stimuli.

Authors:  Orsola Rosa-Salva; Lucia Regolin; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2010-07

3.  Hemispheric specialization and dual processing in strongly versus weakly lateralized chicks.

Authors:  M Dharmaretnam; L J Rogers
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Lower-field myopia in birds: an adaptation that keeps the ground in focus.

Authors:  W Hodos; J T Erichsen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The hawk/goose story: the classical ethological experiments of Lorenz and Tinbergen, revisited.

Authors:  Wolfgang Schleidt; Michael D Shalter; Humberto Moura-Neto
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  Risky times and risky places interact to affect prey behaviour.

Authors:  Egil Dröge; Scott Creel; Matthew S Becker; Jassiel M'soka
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 15.460

7.  A Visual Pathway for Looming-Evoked Escape in Larval Zebrafish.

Authors:  Incinur Temizer; Joseph C Donovan; Herwig Baier; Julia L Semmelhack
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Behavioural assessment of flicker fusion frequency in chicken Gallus gallus domesticus.

Authors:  Thomas J Lisney; Diana Rubene; Jani Rózsa; Hanne Løvlie; Olle Håstad; Anders Ödeen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Inexperienced preys know when to flee or to freeze in front of a threat.

Authors:  Marie Hébert; Elisabetta Versace; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Origins of Knowledge: Insights from Precocial Species.

Authors:  Elisabetta Versace; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.558

View more
  6 in total

1.  Inexperienced preys know when to flee or to freeze in front of a threat.

Authors:  Marie Hébert; Elisabetta Versace; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Snakes elicit specific neural responses in the human infant brain.

Authors:  J Bertels; M Bourguignon; A de Heering; F Chetail; X De Tiège; A Cleeremans; A Destrebecqz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Approach-Avoidance Decisions Under Threat: The Role of Autonomic Psychophysiological States.

Authors:  James J A Livermore; Felix H Klaassen; Bob Bramson; Anneloes M Hulsman; Sjoerd W Meijer; Leslie Held; Floris Klumpers; Lycia D de Voogd; Karin Roelofs
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Brain Responses to Surprising Stimulus Offsets: Phenomenology and Functional Significance.

Authors:  R Somervail; R J Bufacchi; C Salvatori; L Neary-Zajiczek; Y Guo; G Novembre; G D Iannetti
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 4.861

5.  Background choice and immobility as context dependent tadpole responses to perceived predation risk.

Authors:  Paula Cabral Eterovick; Jéssica Stephanie Kloh; Cleber Cunha Figueredo; Pedro Igor Macário Viana; Marcella Goulart; David Travassos Milan; Melissa Bravo Fonseca; Ítalo Moreira Martins; Luan Tavares Pinheiro; Rúbia Praxedes Quintão; Thais Kelly Fagundes Melo; Rodolfo Assis Magalhães; Caio Motta Campos; Vanessa Cristina Monteiro Ferreira; Ana Laura de Oliveira; Miguel Vences
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Visual acuity of budgerigars for moving targets.

Authors:  Sandra Chaib; Juliane Gaviraghi Mussoi; Olle Lind; Almut Kelber
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 2.422

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.