Literature DB >> 21527269

Behavioural assessment of flicker fusion frequency in chicken Gallus gallus domesticus.

Thomas J Lisney1, Diana Rubene, Jani Rózsa, Hanne Løvlie, Olle Håstad, Anders Ödeen.   

Abstract

To interact with its visual environment, an organism needs to perceive objects in both space and time. High temporal resolution is hence important to the fitness of diurnally active animals, not least highly active aerial species such as birds. However, temporal resolution, as assessed by flicker fusion frequency (FFF; the stimulus frequency at which a flickering light stimulus can no longer be resolved and appears continuous) or critical flicker fusion frequency (CFF; the highest flicker fusion frequency at any light intensity) has rarely been assessed in birds. In order to further our understanding of temporal resolution as a function of light intensity in birds we used behavioural experiments with domestic chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) from an old game breed 'Gammalsvensk dvärghöna' (which is morphologically and behaviourally similar to the wildtype ancestor, the red jungle fowl, G. gallus), to generate an 'Intensity/FFF curve' (I/FFF curve) across full spectrum light intensities ranging from 0.2 to 2812 cd m⁻². The I/FFF curve is double-branched, resembling that of other chordates with a duplex retina of both rods and cones. Assuming that the branches represent rod and cone mediated responses respectively, the break point between them places the transition between scotopic and photopic vision at between 0.8 and 1.9 cd m⁻². Average FFF ranged from 19.8 Hz at the lowest light intensity to a CFF 87.0 Hz at 1375 cd m⁻². FFF dropped slightly at the highest light intensity. There was some individual variation with certain birds displaying CFFs of 90-100 Hz. The FFF values demonstrated by this non-selected breed appear to be considerably higher than other behaviourally derived FFF values for similar stimuli reported for white and brown commercial laying hens, indicating that the domestication process might have influenced temporal resolution in chicken.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21527269     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  22 in total

Review 1.  The chick eye in vision research: An excellent model for the study of ocular disease.

Authors:  C Ellis Wisely; Javed A Sayed; Heather Tamez; Chris Zelinka; Mohamed H Abdel-Rahman; Andy J Fischer; Colleen M Cebulla
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  Electrophysiological measures of temporal resolution, contrast sensitivity and spatial resolving power in sharks.

Authors:  Laura A Ryan; Jan M Hemmi; Shaun P Collin; Nathan S Hart
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  The visual ecology of a deep-sea fish, the escolar Lepidocybium flavobrunneum (Smith, 1843).

Authors:  Eva Landgren; Kerstin Fritsches; Richard Brill; Eric Warrant
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Studies on the interactions of retinal dopamine with choroidal thickness in the chicken.

Authors:  Ute Mathis; Marita Feldkaemper; Hong Liu; Frank Schaeffel
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 3.535

5.  Positive selection rather than relaxation of functional constraint drives the evolution of vision during chicken domestication.

Authors:  Ming-Shan Wang; Rong-Wei Zhang; Ling-Yan Su; Yan Li; Min-Sheng Peng; He-Qun Liu; Lin Zeng; David M Irwin; Jiu-Lin Du; Yong-Gang Yao; Dong-Dong Wu; Ya-Ping Zhang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 25.617

6.  Inexperienced preys know when to flee or to freeze in front of a threat.

Authors:  Marie Hébert; Elisabetta Versace; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  How Lovebirds Maneuver Rapidly Using Super-Fast Head Saccades and Image Feature Stabilization.

Authors:  Daniel Kress; Evelien van Bokhorst; David Lentink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The impact of domestication on the chicken optical apparatus.

Authors:  Lina S V Roth; Olle Lind
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mapping of the receptive fields in the optic tectum of chicken (Gallus gallus) using sparse noise.

Authors:  Josine Verhaal; Harald Luksch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Metabolic rate and body size are linked with perception of temporal information.

Authors:  Kevin Healy; Luke McNally; Graeme D Ruxton; Natalie Cooper; Andrew L Jackson
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.