Literature DB >> 31657957

Reveal, Don't Conceal: Transforming Data Visualization to Improve Transparency.

Tracey L Weissgerber1,2, Stacey J Winham3, Ethan P Heinzen3, Jelena S Milin-Lazovic, Oscar Garcia-Valencia1, Zoran Bukumiric4, Marko D Savic4, Vesna D Garovic1, Natasa M Milic1,4.   

Abstract

Reports highlighting the problems with the standard practice of using bar graphs to show continuous data have prompted many journals to adopt new visualization policies. These policies encourage authors to avoid bar graphs and use graphics that show the data distribution; however, they provide little guidance on how to effectively display data. We conducted a systematic review of studies published in top peripheral vascular disease journals to determine what types of figures are used, and to assess the prevalence of suboptimal data visualization practices. Among papers with data figures, 47.7% of papers used bar graphs to present continuous data. This primer provides a detailed overview of strategies for addressing this issue by (1) outlining strategies for selecting the correct type of figure depending on the study design, sample size, and the type of variable; (2) examining techniques for making effective dot plots, box plots, and violin plots; and (3) illustrating how to avoid sending mixed messages by aligning the figure structure with the study design and statistical analysis. We also present solutions to other common problems identified in the systematic review. Resources include a list of free tools and templates that authors can use to create more informative figures and an online simulator that illustrates why summary statistics are meaningful only when there are enough data to summarize. Last, we consider steps that investigators can take to improve figures in the scientific literature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bar graphs; basic science; continuous data; data visualization

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31657957      PMCID: PMC8947810          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  38 in total

1.  Bar graphs depicting averages are perceptually misinterpreted: the within-the-bar bias.

Authors:  George E Newman; Brian J Scholl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

2.  Low placental growth factor across pregnancy identifies a subset of women with preterm preeclampsia: type 1 versus type 2 preeclampsia?

Authors:  Robert W Powers; James M Roberts; Daniel A Plymire; Dominick Pucci; Saul A Datwyler; Don M Laird; David C Sogin; Arun Jeyabalan; Carl A Hubel; Robin E Gandley
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Transparency Is the Key to Quality.

Authors:  Amanda J Fosang; Roger J Colbran
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Development of a framework for graph choice and construction.

Authors:  Aakanksha Angra; Stephanie M Gardner
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.288

5.  STATISTICS. Aligning statistical and scientific reasoning.

Authors:  Steven N Goodman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Lasagna plots: a saucy alternative to spaghetti plots.

Authors:  Bruce J Swihart; Brian Caffo; Bryan D James; Matthew Strand; Brian S Schwartz; Naresh M Punjabi
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Describing and estimating: use and abuse of standard deviations and standard errors.

Authors:  H T Davies
Journal:  Hosp Med       Date:  1998-04

8.  Beyond bar and line graphs: time for a new data presentation paradigm.

Authors:  Tracey L Weissgerber; Natasa M Milic; Stacey J Winham; Vesna D Garovic
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Raincloud plots: a multi-platform tool for robust data visualization.

Authors:  Micah Allen; Davide Poggiali; Kirstie Whitaker; Tom Rhys Marshall; Rogier A Kievit
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2019-04-01

10.  Why we need to report more than 'Data were Analyzed by t-tests or ANOVA'.

Authors:  Natasa M Milic; Stacey J Winham; Tracey L Weissgerber; Oscar Garcia-Valencia; Vesna D Garovic
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  21 in total

1.  Automated screening of COVID-19 preprints: can we help authors to improve transparency and reproducibility?

Authors:  Tracey Weissgerber; Nico Riedel; Halil Kilicoglu; Cyril Labbé; Peter Eckmann; Gerben Ter Riet; Jennifer Byrne; Guillaume Cabanac; Amanda Capes-Davis; Bertrand Favier; Shyam Saladi; Peter Grabitz; Alexandra Bannach-Brown; Robert Schulz; Sarah McCann; Rene Bernard; Anita Bandrowski
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Two graphs walk into a bar: Readout-based measurement reveals the Bar-Tip Limit error, a common, categorical misinterpretation of mean bar graphs.

Authors:  Sarah H Kerns; Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  BioVisReport: A Markdown-based lightweight website builder for reproducible and interactive visualization of results from peer-reviewed publications.

Authors:  Jingcheng Yang; Yaqing Liu; Jun Shang; Yechao Huang; Ying Yu; Zhihui Li; Leming Shi; Zihan Ran
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 6.155

4.  Alternatives to statistical decision trees in regulatory (eco-)toxicological bioassays.

Authors:  Felix M Kluxen; Ludwig A Hothorn
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 5.  Subtypes of Preeclampsia: Recognition and Determining Clinical Usefulness.

Authors:  James M Roberts; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Thomas F McElrath; Lana Garmire; Leslie Myatt
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Australian Aboriginal techniques for memorization: Translation into a medical and allied health education setting.

Authors:  David Reser; Margaret Simmons; Esther Johns; Andrew Ghaly; Michelle Quayle; Aimee L Dordevic; Marianne Tare; Adelle McArdle; Julie Willems; Tyson Yunkaporta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  SuperPlotsOfData-a web app for the transparent display and quantitative comparison of continuous data from different conditions.

Authors:  Joachim Goedhart
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 8.  Revisiting Some Useful Statistical Guidelines in Circulation Research in Response to a Changing Landscape.

Authors:  Heather M Highland; Eric R Gamazon; Jennifer E Below
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 23.213

9.  PlotTwist: A web app for plotting and annotating continuous data.

Authors:  Joachim Goedhart
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Improving the trustworthiness, usefulness, and ethics of biomedical research through an innovative and comprehensive institutional initiative.

Authors:  Daniel Strech; Tracey Weissgerber; Ulrich Dirnagl
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.