Literature DB >> 35733742

Safety of Anterior Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in the Ambulatory Setting: an Eastern European Experience.

Artsiom Klimko1, Dragos Bouros2, Isabella Mindea3, Stefan Mindea4.   

Abstract

Aim: Spine surgery has been gradually transitioning from the inpatient setting into ambulatory surgery centers (ASC) and as such, the safety of treating patients on an outpatient basis needs to be validated. Objective:In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety of anterior cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) performed in an ambulatory setting in an Eastern European population. All existing studies evaluating safety and efficiency of outpatient CDA have originated from high-volume ASCs from the USA.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 103 consecutive patients who underwent outpatient CDA between January 2018 and February 2020 in order to assess the safety of outpatient single- and multi-level CDA procedures. Various operative data was collected, including adverse events.
Results: One patient required reintervention for reposition of the implant, resulting in a reoperation rate of 0.97%. Of the total 149 levels treated, the risk of readmission per level treated was 0.67%. Other AEs included prolonged postoperative hoarseness (laryngeal nerve dysfunction) in two (1.94%) patients, which for one patient resolved within one year. There were no other cases of reintervention, hospital readmission, or postoperative emergency visits.
Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the safety of CDA in the ambulatory setting in an Eastern European population. Our data suggests that CDA may be considered safe in the outpatient setting in appropriately selected patients. The 30-day reintervention rate was 0.97%, while AE rate was 1.94%. The reoperation and AE rates were similar to or lower than the complication rates reported by large US outcome studies.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35733742      PMCID: PMC9168557          DOI: 10.26574/maedica.2022.17.1.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)        ISSN: 1841-9038


  28 in total

Review 1.  Multilevel cervical arthroplasty: current evidence. A systematic review.

Authors:  Andrei F Joaquim; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 2.  Future endeavors in ambulatory spine surgery.

Authors:  Avani S Vaishnav; Steven J McAnany
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

3.  An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 2. Predictive model for return to work after elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease.

Authors:  Anthony L Asher; Clinton J Devin; Kristin R Archer; Silky Chotai; Scott L Parker; Mohamad Bydon; Hui Nian; Frank E Harrell; Theodore Speroff; Robert S Dittus; Sharon E Philips; Christopher I Shaffrey; Kevin T Foley; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2017-05-12

4.  The prevalence of indications and contraindications to cervical total disc replacement.

Authors:  Joshua D Auerbach; Kristofer J Jones; Christian I Fras; Jessica R Balderston; Scott A Rushton; Kingsley R Chin
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Comparison of adjacent segment degeneration five years after single level cervical fusion and cervical arthroplasty: a retrospective controlled study.

Authors:  Yu Sun; Yan-bin Zhao; Sheng-fa Pan; Fei-fei Zhou; Zhong-qiang Chen; Zhong-jun Liu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  Subsequent surgery rates after cervical total disc replacement using a Mobi-C Cervical Disc Prosthesis versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomized clinical trial with 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Robert J Jackson; Reginald J Davis; Gregory A Hoffman; Hyun W Bae; Michael S Hisey; Kee D Kim; Steven E Gaede; Pierce Dalton Nunley
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2016-01-22

7.  Safety of Outpatient Single-level Cervical Total Disc Replacement: A Propensity-Matched Multi-institutional Study.

Authors:  Patawut Bovonratwet; Michael C Fu; Vineet Tyagi; Nathaniel T Ondeck; Todd J Albert; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Outpatient spine surgery: defining the outcomes, value, and barriers to implementation.

Authors:  Arjun Vivek Pendharkar; Maryam Nour Shahin; Allen Lin Ho; Eric Scott Sussman; David Arnold Purger; Anand Veeravagu; John Kevin Ratliff; Atman Mukesh Desai
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.047

9.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  A Review of Complication Rates for Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion (ACDF).

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2019-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.