Literature DB >> 31656592

Imputation techniques on missing values in breast cancer treatment and fertility data.

Xuetong Wu1, Hadi Akbarzadeh Khorshidi1, Uwe Aickelin1, Zobaida Edib2, Michelle Peate2.   

Abstract

Clinical decision support using data mining techniques offers more intelligent way to reduce the decision error in the last few years. However, clinical datasets often suffer from high missingness, which adversely impacts the quality of modelling if handled improperly. Imputing missing values provides an opportunity to resolve the issue. Conventional imputation methods adopt simple statistical analysis, such as mean imputation or discarding missing cases, which have many limitations and thus degrade the performance of learning. This study examines a series of machine learning based imputation methods and suggests an efficient approach to in preparing a good quality breast cancer (BC) dataset, to find the relationship between BC treatment and chemotherapy-related amenorrhoea, where the performance is evaluated with the accuracy of the prediction. To this end, the reliability and robustness of six well-known imputation methods are evaluated. Our results show that imputation leads to a significant boost in the classification performance compared to the model prediction based on listwise deletion. Furthermore, the results reveal that most methods gain strong robustness and discriminant power even the dataset experiences high missing rate (> 50%). © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Classification; Imputation; Missing data; Post-treatment amenorrhoea

Year:  2019        PMID: 31656592      PMCID: PMC6775181          DOI: 10.1007/s13755-019-0082-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Inf Sci Syst        ISSN: 2047-2501


  10 in total

1.  MissForest--non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data.

Authors:  Daniel J Stekhoven; Peter Bühlmann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Ovarian reserve tests for predicting fertility outcomes for assisted reproductive technology: the International Systematic Collaboration of Ovarian Reserve Evaluation protocol for a systematic review of ovarian reserve test accuracy.

Authors:  N P Johnson; E M Bagrie; A Coomarasamy; S Bhattacharya; A N Shelling; S Jessop; C Farquhar; K S Khan
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  It's now or never: fertility-related knowledge, decision-making preferences, and treatment intentions in young women with breast cancer--an Australian fertility decision aid collaborative group study.

Authors:  Michelle Peate; Bettina Meiser; Michael Friedlander; Helen Zorbas; Susan Rovelli; Ursula Sansom-Daly; Jennifer Sangster; Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic; Martha Hickey
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The effect of imputing missing clinical attribute values on training lung cancer survival prediction model performance.

Authors:  Mohamed S Barakat; Matthew Field; Aditya Ghose; David Stirling; Lois Holloway; Shalini Vinod; Andre Dekker; David Thwaites
Journal:  Health Inf Sci Syst       Date:  2017-12-06

5.  Pregnancy after breast cancer: population based study.

Authors:  Angela Ives; Christobel Saunders; Max Bulsara; James Semmens
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-12-08

6.  Missing data imputation using statistical and machine learning methods in a real breast cancer problem.

Authors:  José M Jerez; Ignacio Molina; Pedro J García-Laencina; Emilio Alba; Nuria Ribelles; Miguel Martín; Leonardo Franco
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 5.326

7.  Chemotherapy-related amenorrhea in premenopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Sunyoung Lee; Whoon Jong Kil; Mison Chun; Yong-Sik Jung; Seok Yun Kang; Seung-Hee Kang; Young-Taek Oh
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Breast cancer presentation and diagnostic delays in young women.

Authors:  Kathryn J Ruddy; Shari Gelber; Rulla M Tamimi; Lidia Schapira; Steven E Come; Meghan E Meyer; Eric P Winer; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Multiple imputation: dealing with missing data.

Authors:  Moniek C M de Goeij; Merel van Diepen; Kitty J Jager; Giovanni Tripepi; Carmine Zoccali; Friedo W Dekker
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 5.992

10.  Chemotherapy-Related Amenorrhea and Menopause in Young Chinese Breast Cancer Patients: Analysis on Incidence, Risk Factors and Serum Hormone Profiles.

Authors:  Giok S Liem; Frankie K F Mo; Elizabeth Pang; Joyce J S Suen; Nelson L S Tang; Kun M Lee; Claudia H W Yip; Wing H Tam; Rita Ng; Jane Koh; Christopher C H Yip; Grace W S Kong; Winnie Yeo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Data Mining in Healthcare: Applying Strategic Intelligence Techniques to Depict 25 Years of Research Development.

Authors:  Maikel Luis Kolling; Leonardo B Furstenau; Michele Kremer Sott; Bruna Rabaioli; Pedro Henrique Ulmi; Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Leonel Pablo Carvalho Tedesco
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.