| Literature DB >> 33802880 |
Maikel Luis Kolling1, Leonardo B Furstenau2, Michele Kremer Sott1, Bruna Rabaioli3, Pedro Henrique Ulmi4, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi5, Leonel Pablo Carvalho Tedesco1,4.
Abstract
In order to identify the strategic topics and the thematic evolution structure of data mining applied to healthcare, in this paper, a bibliometric performance and network analysis (BPNA) was conducted. For this purpose, 6138 articles were sourced from the Web of Science covering the period from 1995 to July 2020 and the SciMAT software was used. Our results present a strategic diagram composed of 19 themes, of which the 8 motor themes ('NEURAL-NETWORKS', 'CANCER', 'ELETRONIC-HEALTH-RECORDS', 'DIABETES-MELLITUS', 'ALZHEIMER'S-DISEASE', 'BREAST-CANCER', 'DEPRESSION', and 'RANDOM-FOREST') are depicted in a thematic network. An in-depth analysis was carried out in order to find hidden patterns and to provide a general perspective of the field. The thematic network structure is arranged thusly that its subjects are organized into two different areas, (i) practices and techniques related to data mining in healthcare, and (ii) health concepts and disease supported by data mining, embodying, respectively, the hotspots related to the data mining and medical scopes, hence demonstrating the field's evolution over time. Such results make it possible to form the basis for future research and facilitate decision-making by researchers and practitioners, institutions, and governments interested in data mining in healthcare.Entities:
Keywords: SciMAT; bibliometrics; co-word analysis; data mining; healthcare 4.0; industry 4.0; science mapping; strategic intelligence
Year: 2021 PMID: 33802880 PMCID: PMC8002654 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18063099
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Existing bibliometric analysis of data mining in healthcare in Web of Science (WoS).
| Study | Coverage | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| [ | 2000–2017 | Analysis of the evolution of emerging technologies (e.g., data mining, machine learning, among others) in cancer using CiteSpace software. |
| [ | 2009–2018 | Exploration of data mining and machine learning in public health sector. |
| [ | 2011–2019 | Investigation of medical data mining using VOSviewer and CiteSpace software. |
| This paper | 1995–2020 | A BPNA of data mining in healthcare: performance analysis, strategic themes, thematic evolution structure, trends and future opportunities using SciMAT software. |
Figure 1Strategic diagram (a). Thematic network structure (b). Thematic evolution structure (c).
Figure 2Workflow of the bibliometric performance and network analysis (BPNA).
Figure 3Number of publications over time (1995–July 2020).
Most Cited/Productive authors from 1995 to July 2020.
| Author Citation | Citations | Author Productivity | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bate, Andrew C. | 945 | Li, Chien-Feng | 36 |
| Lindquist, Marie | 943 | Acharya, U. Rajendra | 21 |
| Edwards, E.R. | 888 | Chung, Kyungyong | 21 |
| Moore, Jason H. | 711 | Chen, Gang | 19 |
| Cook, Diane, J. | 599 | Lee, Sung-Wei | 18 |
| Eppig, Janan, T. | 577 | Moore, Jason H. | 17 |
| White, Bill, C. | 541 | Cano, Maria | 17 |
| Bellazi, Riccardo | 527 | Chang, I-Wei | 16 |
| Szarfman, A. | 511 | He, Hong-Lin | 16 |
| Lambin, Philippe | 489 | Moro, Pedro L. | 16 |
Journals that publish studies to data mining in healthcare.
| Journal | Doc. | JIF |
|---|---|---|
| PLOS One | 124 | 2.74 |
| Expert Systems with Applications | 105 | 5.89 |
| Artificial Intelligence in Medicine | 75 | 4.47 |
| Journal of Biomedical Informatics | 75 | 3.57 |
| BMC Bioinformatics | 66 | 2.13 |
| Journal of Medical Systems | 65 | 2.83 |
| IEEE Access | 65 | 3.74 |
| Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine | 59 | 3.63 |
| International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications | 54 | 1.32 |
| Journal of The American Medical Informatics Association | 53 | 4.11 |
Institutions and countries that publish studies to data mining in healthcare.
| University | Documents | Country | Documents |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbia University | 62 | United States | 1973 |
| U.S. FDA Registration | 62 | China | 923 |
| Harvard University | 60 | England | 370 |
| Stanford University | 55 | India | 354 |
| Chinese Academy of Sciences | 53 | Germany | 312 |
| Chi Mei Medical Center | 47 | Italy | 297 |
| University of Pennsylvania | 45 | Taiwan | 294 |
| Kaohsiung Medical University | 44 | Australia | 282 |
| University of Toronto | 44 | Canada | 252 |
| University of Pittsburgh | 44 | Netherlands | 117 |
Most relevant WoS subject categories and research fields.
| WoS Subject Categories | Doc. |
|---|---|
| Computer Science Artificial Intelligence | 768 |
| Medical Informatics | 744 |
| Computer Science Information Systems | 722 |
| Computer Science Interdisciplinary Applications | 603 |
| Mathematical Computational Biology | 505 |
| Health Care Sciences Services | 419 |
| Pharmacology Pharmacy | 370 |
| Engineering Electrical Electronic | 364 |
| Computer Science Theory Methods | 357 |
| Biochemical Research Methods | 304 |
Figure 4Strategic diagram of data mining in healthcare (1995–July 2020).
Figure 5Thematic network structure of mining in healthcare (1995–July 2020). (a) The cluster ‘NEURAL-NETWORKS’. (b) The cluster ‘CANCER’. (c) The cluster ‘ELECTRONIC-HEALTH-RECORDS’. (d) The cluster ‘DIABETES-MELLITUS’. (e) The cluster ‘BREAST-CANCER’. (f) The cluster ‘ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE’. (g) The cluster ‘DEPRESSION’. (h) The cluster ‘RANDOM-FOREST’.
Figure 6Thematic evolution structure of mining in healthcare (1995–July 2020).