Literature DB >> 21444865

It's now or never: fertility-related knowledge, decision-making preferences, and treatment intentions in young women with breast cancer--an Australian fertility decision aid collaborative group study.

Michelle Peate1, Bettina Meiser, Michael Friedlander, Helen Zorbas, Susan Rovelli, Ursula Sansom-Daly, Jennifer Sangster, Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic, Martha Hickey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: For many young women with early breast cancer, fertility is a priority. Interventions to retain fertility options generally need to be accessed before chemotherapy, but many women do not receive information regarding these options in a timely fashion. Knowledge about fertility and decisional conflict has not previously been measured in young patients with breast cancer considering future pregnancies.
METHODS: One hundred eleven young women with early breast cancer who had not yet completed their families were recruited around the time of diagnosis. Knowledge regarding fertility-related information, decisional conflict, and preferences regarding fertility information and decision making was measured.
RESULTS: From a potential fertility-related knowledge score of 10, the mean was 5.2 (standard deviation = 2.3; range, 0 to 10). Decreased knowledge was associated with increased decisional conflict about pursuing fertility preserving interventions (odds ratio [OR] = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.73; P < .001). Thirty-one percent of women reported that they would consider undertaking in vitro fertilization (IVF) as a method to conserve their fertility, whereas 38% were uncertain. Consideration of IVF was not related to whether subjects were in a committed relationship (OR = 1.20; P = .716) or a definite desire for more children (OR = 1.54; P = .513).
CONCLUSION: Around diagnosis, many young patients with breast cancer have low levels of knowledge about fertility issues. Further, low knowledge is associated with increased decisional conflict, which is likely to undermine the quality of decision making. These findings suggest that targeted and timely fertility information may reduce decisional conflict and increase informed choice. Neither relationship status nor firm plans regarding future children reliably predict desire to pursue fertility preservation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21444865     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.2462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  53 in total

1.  A pilot study to examine patient awareness and provider discussion of the impact of cancer treatment on fertility in a registry-based sample of African American women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Susan T Vadaparampil; Juliette Christie; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Patrice Fleming; Caitlin Stowe; Bethanne Bower; Tuya Pal
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Prospective study of depression and anxiety in female fertility preservation and infertility patients.

Authors:  Angela K Lawson; Susan C Klock; Mary Ellen Pavone; Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron; Kristin N Smith; Ralph R Kazer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 3.  Psychological Counseling of Female Fertility Preservation Patients.

Authors:  Angela K Lawson; Susan C Klock; Mary Ellen Pavone; Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron; Kristin N Smith; Ralph R Kazer
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2015

4.  A pilot study of BRCA mutation carriers' knowledge about the clinical impact of prophylactic-oophorectomy and views on fertility consultation: a single-center pilot study.

Authors:  J Kim; C Skrzynia; J E Mersereau
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Fertility concerns and preservation strategies in young women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Tadahiko Shien
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Do Patient Characteristics Decide if Young Adult Cancer Patients Undergo Fertility Preservation?

Authors:  Dina M Flink; Jeanelle Sheeder; Laxmi A Kondapalli
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 2.223

7.  Barriers to information provision regarding breast cancer and its treatment.

Authors:  Heather J Campbell-Enns; Roberta L Woodgate; Harvey M Chochinov
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Toward theoretical understanding of the fertility preservation decision-making process: examining information processing among young women with cancer.

Authors:  Patricia E Hershberger; Lorna Finnegan; Susan Altfeld; Sara Lake; Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron
Journal:  Res Theory Nurs Pract       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 9.  A Review of the Oncology Patient's Challenges for Utilizing Fertility Preservation Services.

Authors:  Dina M Flink; Jeanelle Sheeder; Laxmi A Kondapalli
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.223

Review 10.  Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update.

Authors:  Alison W Loren; Pamela B Mangu; Lindsay Nohr Beck; Lawrence Brennan; Anthony J Magdalinski; Ann H Partridge; Gwendolyn Quinn; W Hamish Wallace; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.