Literature DB >> 31656404

Effect of repeat manual blood pressure measurement on blood pressure and stage of hypertension.

Bryce C Rhodehouse1,2, Jerry Fan1,2, Wencong Chen3, Michael J McNeal1,2, Charis G Durham1,2, John P Erwin1,2.   

Abstract

Hypertension management guidelines are influenced by clinical trials that utilize automated office blood pressure (BP) to measure BP. Many primary care clinics still use manual office BP, which has been shown to produce significantly higher BP values than automated office BP. In a primary care office, a manual BP was obtained by nursing staff using an aneroid sphygmomanometer. Initial BPs ≥120/80 mm Hg were repeated during the clinical encounter by the physician. A total of 1012 encounters were analyzed, with 1000 meeting inclusion criteria. The median difference between nurse and provider BP was 4 mm Hg in systolic BP and 2 mm Hg in diastolic BP (P < 0.0001), with the greatest difference seen in patients with initial BPs >150 mm Hg systolic (10 mm Hg; P < 0.0001). Repeating BP measurements resulted in 34% of patients being reclassified to a lower hypertension stage. Patients with stage 1 and 2 hypertension initially were reclassified as controlled (systolic BP <130 mm Hg) in 40% and 8% of encounters, respectively, with repeat measurements. In clinics that use manual office BP, repeating a manual BP by the physician may provide a better reflection of adherence to standard hypertension performance measures used in the primary care setting.
Copyright © 2019 Baylor University Medical Center.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hypertension; manual office blood pressure; primary care clinic; repeat blood pressure measurement

Year:  2019        PMID: 31656404      PMCID: PMC6793976          DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2019.1626657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)        ISSN: 0899-8280


  14 in total

1.  Manual and automated office measurements in relation to awake ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Marshall Godwin; Richard Birtwhistle; Dianne Delva; Miu Lam; Ian Casson; Susan MacDonald; Rachelle Seguin
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 2.  Doctors record higher blood pressures than nurses: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher E Clark; Isabella A Horvath; Rod S Taylor; John L Campbell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  How common is white coat hypertension?

Authors:  T G Pickering; G D James; C Boddie; G A Harshfield; S Blank; J H Laragh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-01-08       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Paul K Whelton; Robert M Carey; Wilbert S Aronow; Donald E Casey; Karen J Collins; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Sondra M DePalma; Samuel Gidding; Kenneth A Jamerson; Daniel W Jones; Eric J MacLaughlin; Paul Muntner; Bruce Ovbiagele; Sidney C Smith; Crystal C Spencer; Randall S Stafford; Sandra J Taler; Randal J Thomas; Kim A Williams; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joshua D Bundy; Changwei Li; Patrick Stuchlik; Xiaoqing Bu; Tanika N Kelly; Katherine T Mills; Hua He; Jing Chen; Paul K Whelton; Jiang He
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 14.676

6.  Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies.

Authors:  Sarah Lewington; Robert Clarke; Nawab Qizilbash; Richard Peto; Rory Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Association of Repeated Measurements With Blood Pressure Control in Primary Care.

Authors:  Douglas Einstadter; Shari D Bolen; James E Misak; David S Bar-Shain; Randall D Cebul
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 8.  Benefits and Harms of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment in Adults Aged 60 Years or Older: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jessica Weiss; Michele Freeman; Allison Low; Rochelle Fu; Amy Kerfoot; Robin Paynter; Makalapua Motu'apuaka; Karli Kondo; Devan Kansagara
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Benefits and Harms of Antihypertensive Treatment in Low-Risk Patients With Mild Hypertension.

Authors:  James P Sheppard; Sarah Stevens; Richard Stevens; Una Martin; Jonathan Mant; F D Richard Hobbs; Richard J McManus
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  The Utility of Repeating Automated Blood Pressure Measurements in the Primary Care Office.

Authors:  Usama A Daimee; Douglas Done; Wan Tang; Xin M Tu; John D Bisognano; William H Bayer
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.