Literature DB >> 28564682

Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Joshua D Bundy1, Changwei Li1, Patrick Stuchlik1, Xiaoqing Bu2, Tanika N Kelly1, Katherine T Mills1, Hua He1, Jing Chen3, Paul K Whelton3, Jiang He3.   

Abstract

Importance: Clinical trials have documented that lowering blood pressure reduces cardiovascular disease and premature deaths. However, the optimal target for reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP) is uncertain. Objective: To assess the association of mean achieved SBP levels with the risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in adults with hypertension treated with antihypertensive therapy. Data Sources: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from inception to December 15, 2015, supplemented by manual searches of the bibliographies of retrieved articles. Study Selection: Studies included were clinical trials with random allocation to an antihypertensive medication, control, or treatment target. Studies had to have reported a difference in mean achieved SBP of 5 mm Hg or more between comparison groups. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted from each study independently and in duplicate by at least 2 investigators according to a standardized protocol. Network meta-analysis was used to obtain pooled randomized results comparing the association of each 5-mm Hg SBP category with clinical outcomes after adjusting for baseline risk. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality.
Results: Forty-two trials, including 144 220 patients, met the eligibility criteria. In general, there were linear associations between mean achieved SBP and risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality, with the lowest risk at 120 to 124 mm Hg. Randomized groups with a mean achieved SBP of 120 to 124 mm Hg had a hazard ratio (HR) for major cardiovascular disease of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.60-0.83) compared with randomized groups with a mean achieved SBP of 130 to 134 mm Hg, an HR of 0.58 (95% CI, 0.48-0.72) compared with those with a mean achieved SBP of 140 to 144 mm Hg, an HR of 0.46 (95% CI, 0.34-0.63) compared with those with a mean achieved SBP of 150 to 154 mm Hg, and an HR of 0.36 (95% CI, 0.26-0.51) compared with those with a mean achieved SBP of 160 mm Hg or more. Likewise, randomized groups with a mean achieved SBP of 120 to 124 mm Hg had an HR for all-cause mortality of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.58-0.93) compared with randomized groups with a mean achieved SBP of 130 to 134 mm Hg, an HR of 0.59 (95% CI, 0.45-0.77) compared with those with a mean achieved SBP of 140 to 144 mm Hg, an HR of 0.51 (95% CI, 0.36-0.71) compared with those with a mean achieved SBP of 150 to 154 mm Hg, and an HR of 0.47 (95% CI, 0.32-0.67) compared with those with a mean achieved SBP of 160 mm Hg or more. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that reducing SBP to levels below currently recommended targets significantly reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. These findings support more intensive control of SBP among adults with hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28564682      PMCID: PMC5710614          DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Cardiol            Impact factor:   14.676


  22 in total

Review 1.  SPRINT: What Remains Unanswered and Where Do We Go From Here?

Authors:  Daniel W Jones; Lyssa Weatherly; John E Hall
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Aggressive blood pressure lowering is dangerous: the J-curve: pro side of the arguement.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Guido Grassi
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data.

Authors:  Patricia M Kearney; Megan Whelton; Kristi Reynolds; Paul Muntner; Paul K Whelton; Jiang He
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jan 15-21       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dena Ettehad; Connor A Emdin; Amit Kiran; Simon G Anderson; Thomas Callender; Jonathan Emberson; John Chalmers; Anthony Rodgers; Kazem Rahimi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  William C Cushman; Gregory W Evans; Robert P Byington; David C Goff; Richard H Grimm; Jeffrey A Cutler; Denise G Simons-Morton; Jan N Basile; Marshall A Corson; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Lois Katz; Kevin A Peterson; William T Friedewald; John B Buse; J Thomas Bigger; Hertzel C Gerstein; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Dias; N J Welton; D M Caldwell; A E Ades
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Outcomes of combined cardiovascular risk factor management strategies in type 2 diabetes: the ACCORD randomized trial.

Authors:  Karen L Margolis; Patrick J O'Connor; Timothy M Morgan; John B Buse; Robert M Cohen; William C Cushman; Jeffrey A Cutler; Gregory W Evans; Hertzel C Gerstein; Richard H Grimm; Edward W Lipkin; K M Venkat Narayan; Matthew C Riddle; Ajay Sood; David C Goff
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Jessica K Barrett; Stephen Rice; Ian R White; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  163 in total

1.  Fumarase Overexpression Abolishes Hypertension Attributable to endothelial NO synthase Haploinsufficiency in Dahl Salt-Sensitive Rats.

Authors:  Hong Xue; Aron M Geurts; Kristie Usa; Feng Wang; Yingying Lin; Jenifer Phillips; Lisa Henderson; Maria Angeles Baker; Zhongmin Tian; Mingyu Liang
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 2.  Dangers of Overly Aggressive Blood Pressure Control.

Authors:  Faisal Rahman; John W McEvoy
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Cost-Effectiveness and Challenges of Implementing Intensive Blood Pressure Goals and Team-Based Care.

Authors:  Catherine G Derington; Jordan B King; Kelsey B Bryant; Blake T McGee; Andrew E Moran; William S Weintraub; Brandon K Bellows; Adam P Bress
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  Potential US Population Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA High Blood Pressure Guideline.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Robert M Carey; Samuel Gidding; Daniel W Jones; Sandra J Taler; Jackson T Wright; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Association of Blood Pressure Lowering With Mortality and Cardiovascular Disease Across Blood Pressure Levels: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mattias Brunström; Bo Carlberg
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Blood Pressure and Mortality: Joint Effect of Blood Pressure Measures.

Authors:  Jung Ki Kim; Eileen M Crimmins
Journal:  J Clin Cardiol Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2020-10-21

Review 7.  [Blood pressure targets : The lower the better does not suit all].

Authors:  U Hoffmann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.743

8.  Potential U.S. Population Impact of the 2017 ACC/AHA High Blood Pressure Guideline.

Authors:  Paul Muntner; Robert M Carey; Samuel Gidding; Daniel W Jones; Sandra J Taler; Jackson T Wright; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training On Blood Pressure in Adults with Pre- to Established Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Eduardo Caldas Costa; Jacqueline L Hay; Dustin S Kehler; Kevin F Boreskie; Rakesh C Arora; Daniel Umpierre; Andrea Szwajcer; Todd A Duhamel
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Sprinting Toward the Optimal Blood Pressure Target for Hypertensive Patients.

Authors:  Suzanne Oparil; William C Cushman; Karen C Johnson; Dalane W Kitzman; Paul K Whelton; Jackson T Wright
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 17.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.