| Literature DB >> 31655590 |
Ryosuke Matsuoka1, Yayoi Takahashi2, Ayano Muto2, Mamoru Kimura2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We previously reported the abdominal fat-reducing effect of unheated egg white proteins (EWP); however, unheated egg white is actually rarely consumed. We thus investigated the effect of heated egg white on abdominal fat in rats.Entities:
Keywords: Abdominal fat; Diet; Egg white protein; Heated; Lactic fermented; Micelle; Rats
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31655590 PMCID: PMC6815000 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-019-1133-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Effects of Heated EWP on abdominal fat, serum, and hepatic lipid parameters in rats (Trial 1)
| Casein | Heated EWP | Change (%) vs. Casein | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Growth Parameter (g/day) | |||
| Body weight gain | 6.64 ± 0.13 | 6.74 ± 0.20 | 98.6 ± 1.4 |
| Food intake | 16.3 ± 0.0 | 16.0 ± 0.0 | 101 ± 3 |
| Adipose Tissue Weight (g/100 B.W.) | |||
| mesenteric | 1.03 ± 0.08 | 1.05 ± 0.11 | 102 ± 11 |
| perirenal | 1.63 ± 0.17 | 1.72 ± 0.19 | 106 ± 12 |
| epididymal | 1.44 ± 0.15 | 1.51 ± 0.15 | 105 ± 10 |
| total | 4.10 ± 0.10 | 4.39 ± 0.39 | 105 ± 10 |
| Serum Parameter | |||
| Triglyceride (mg/100 mL) | 64.1 ± 12.2 | 85.3 ± 13.7 | 133 ± 21 |
| Phospholipid (mg/100 mL) | 118 ± 7 | 159 ± 11* | 135 ± 9 |
| Free fatty acid (mEQ/L) | 0.680 ± 0.073 | 0.774 ± 0.071 | 114 ± 10 |
| Hepatic lipids (mg/g liver) | |||
| Triglyceride | 28.1 ± 2.3 | 17.7 ± 1.4* | 63.1 ± 5.0 |
| Phospholipid | 37.9 ± 1.2 | 34.5 ± 0.6 | 90.9 ± 1.6 |
Mean ± SE of 8 rats. * Significant difference at p < 0.05 by Stndent’s t-test
EWP egg white protein
Effects of unheated EWP, heated EWP, or FLE on the abdominal fat, serum, and hepatic lipid parameters in rats (Trial 2)
| Casein | Unheated EWP | Heated EWP | FLE | Change (%) vs. Casein | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unheated EWP | Heated EWP | FLE | |||||
| Growth Parameter (g/day) | |||||||
| Body weight gain | 6.91 ± 0.10 | 6.44 ± 0.26 | 7.17 ± 0.16 | 6.34 ± 0.28 | 93.2 ± 3.8 | 103 ± 2 | 91.7 ± 4.0 |
| Food intake | 16.2 ± 0.2 | 15.7 ± 0.4 | 16.3 ± 0.2 | 15.5 ± 0.5 | 97.1 ± 2.2 | 101 ± 1 | 95.9 ± 3.4 |
| Adipose Tissue Weight (g/100 B.W.) | |||||||
| mesenteric | 0.738 ± 0.074a | 0.503 ± 0.036ab | 0.725 ± 0.053a | 0.427 ± 0.057b | 71.1 ± 5.2 | 97.8 ± 5.7 | 58.1 ± 5.6 |
| perirenal | 1.80 ± 0.04a | 1.07 ± 0.01b | 1.72 ± 0.15a | 0.854 ± 0.100b | 63.7 ± 5.6 | 89.1 ± 7.8 | 49.4 ± 4.3 |
| epididymal | 1.51 ± 0.05a | 1.03 ± 0.10b | 1.76 ± 0.08a | 1.05 ± 0.08b | 72.5 ± 6.5 | 109 ± 7.9 | 69.1 ± 4.0 |
| total | 4.06 ± 0.08a | 2.82 ± 0.22b | 4.20 ± 0.21a | 2.33 ± 0.02b | 68.3 ± 5.1 | 98.3 ± 6.3 | 58.3 ± 3.6 |
| Serum Parameter | |||||||
| Triglyceride (mg/100 mL) | 114 ± 29a | 72.7 ± 7.3ab | 131 ± 23a | 35.4 ± 5.0b | 63.7 ± 6.4 | 114 ± 20 | 31.1 ± 4.4 |
| Phospholipid (mg/100 mL) | 159 ± 7 | 184 ± 7 | 218 ± 17 | 121 ± 8 | 115 ± 4.0 | 137 ± 11 | 76.3 ± 5.2 |
| Free fatty acid (mEQ/L) | 0.816 ± 0.093a | 0.773 ± 0.076ab | 0.782 ± 0.054ab | 0.531 ± 0.036b | 94.6 ± 9.3 | 95.7 ± 6.5 | 64.9 ± 4.4 |
| Insulin (ng/mL) | 3.13 ± 0.46 | 2.67 ± 0.51 | 3.36 ± 0.77 | 1.72 ± 0.33 | 85.4 ± 16.2 | 108 ± 25 | 54.9 ± 10.6 |
| Leptin (ng/mL) | 2.19 ± 0.17ab | 1.64 ± 0.15a | 2.94 ± 0.57b | 1.29 ± 0.18a | 77.2 ± 6.7 | 134 ± 26 | 58.7 ± 8.2 |
| Hepatic Lipids (mg/g liver) | |||||||
| Triglyceride | 18.2 ± 1.8a | 15.1 ± 1.5ab | 19.4 ± 1.6a | 12.9 ± 1.7b | 83.2 ± 7.0 | 107 ± 8 | 71.0 ± 8.1 |
| Phospholipid | 27.2 ± 0.7 | 26.9 ± 0.5 | 24.8 ± 0.7 | 27.6 ± 1.0 | 98.6 ± 1.9 | 91.0 ± 2.7 | 100 ± 4 |
Mean ± SE of 8 rats. ab: Different letters show a significant difference at p < 0.05 by Turkey’s test., EWP egg white protein, FLE: lactic fermented egg white
Fig. 1Electrophoresis of unheated EWP, heated EWP, FLE, and pepsin hydrolysates. EWP: egg white protein, FLE: lactic fermented egg white
Effects of protein hydrolysate on the micellar fatty acid contents in vitro
| Micellar fatty acid (%) | |
|---|---|
| Casein-PH | 33.9 ± 1.1 |
| EWP-PH | 28.9 ± 1.4* |
| Casein-PH | 49.1 ± 0.9 |
| Ovalbumin-PH | 36.3 ± 0.7# |
| Ovotransferrin-PH | 36.0 ± 0.6# |
| Ovomucoid-PH | 65.5 ± 6.8 |
| Lysozyme-PH | 32.0 ± 0.3# |
| Casein-PH | 38.8 ± 0.6 |
| Reconstract EWP-PH | 38.1 ± 0.6 |
Mean ± SE of 3–5 samples. Different letters were shown a significant difference (p < 0.05). EWP: egg white protein, PH: pepsin hydrolysate, Reconstructed EWP: Ovalbumin-PH: Ovotransferrin-PH: Ovomucoid-PH: Lysozyme-PH = 54:12.5:11:3.5