| Literature DB >> 31654171 |
Mitchel Tate1,2, Gavin C Higgins2,3, Miles J De Blasio1, Runa Lindblom2,3, Darnel Prakoso1, Minh Deo1, Helen Kiriazis4, Min Park5, Carlos D Baeza-Garza5, Stuart T Caldwell6, Richard C Hartley6, Thomas Krieg5, Michael P Murphy5,7, Melinda T Coughlan2,3, Rebecca H Ritchie8,9.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Methylglyoxal, a by-product of glycolysis and a precursor in the formation of advanced glycation end-products, is significantly elevated in the diabetic myocardium. Therefore, we sought to investigate the mitochondria-targeted methylglyoxal scavenger, MitoGamide, in an experimental model of spontaneous diabetic cardiomyopathy.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetes; Diabetic cardiomyopathy; Heart; Methylglyoxal
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31654171 PMCID: PMC6994445 DOI: 10.1007/s10557-019-06914-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Drugs Ther ISSN: 0920-3206 Impact factor: 3.727
Fig. 1MitoGamide treatment attenuates LV diastolic dysfunction in Akita mice. a The structure of MitoGamide. b Overview of experimental protocol. Tissue Doppler echocardiography was used to derive c peak e′ and peak a′ velocity, and d e′/a′ ratio. Doppler echocardiography was used to derive e deceleration time. f E/e′ ratio g peak E and peak A wave velocity, and h E/A ratio. i Representative images of Doppler and tissue Doppler echocardiography. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 8–13 per group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ****P < 0.0001. Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. V, vehicle; MG, MitoGamide; WT, wild type
Systemic characteristics, organ morphology and echocardiographic analysis of systolic heart function in anaesthetised wild type and Akita mice treated with MitoGamide or vehicle
| Wild type | Akita | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vehicle | MitoGamide | Vehicle | MitoGamide | |
| Systemic characteristics/organ morphology | ||||
| 14 | 15 | 14 | 12 | |
| Body weight (g) | 29.9 ± 1.2 | 28.5 ± 0.5 | 22.8 ± 0.9**** | 23.7 ± 0.7** |
| Tibial length (mm) | 17.3 ± 0.1 | 17.1 ± 0.2 | 16.7 ± 0.1* | 16.4 ± 0.1** |
| Blood glucose (mmol/L) | 10.8 ± 0.6 | 11.7 ± 0.7 | 33.0 ± 0.0**** | 32.6 ± 0.4**** |
| HbA1c (%) | 4.60 ± 0.17 | 4.83 ± 0.16 | 13.1 ± 0.35**** | 13.3 ± 0.26**** |
| Plasma insulin (ng/mL) | 0.89 ± 0.04 | 0.92 ± 0.07 | 0.75 ± 0.01* | 0.78 ± 0.02 |
| Heart weight/tibial length (mg/mm) | 9.19 ± 0.42 | 8.26 ± 0.33 | 7.02 ± 0.13**** | 7.72 ± 0.33 |
| LV/tibial length (mg/mm) | 6.18 ± 0.27 | 5.57 ± 0.19 | 4.50 ± 0.10**** | 5.05 ± 0.16 |
| RV/tibial length (mg/mm) | 1.64 ± 0.09 | 1.54 ± 0.08 | 1.25 ± 0.06** | 1.30 ± 0.07 |
| LV function | ||||
| 12 | 13 | 9 | 10 | |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 399 ± 17 | 418 ± 11 | 381 ± 10 | 385 ± 15 |
| Ex-LVEDD (mm) | 5.75 ± 0.11 | 5.51 ± 0.09 | 5.19 ± 0.05** | 5.31 ± 0.09 |
| AWd (mm) | 0.67 ± 0.02 | 0.67 ± 0.01 | 0.60 ± 0.02* | 0.61 ± 0.01* |
| LVEDD (mm) | 4.40 ± 0.12 | 4.19 ± 0.10 | 4.01 ± 0.08 | 4.09 ± 0.12 |
| PWd (mm) | 0.68 ± 0.02 | 0.68 ± 0.02 | 0.60 ± 0.01*** | 0.63 ± 0.01 |
| LVESD (mm) | 3.15 ± 0.08 | 2.96 ± 0.10 | 2.55 ± 0.09*** | 2.58 ± 0.09* |
| Fractional shortening (%) | 28.3 ± 0.5 | 29.5 ± 1.0 | 36.5 ± 1.6**** | 37.0 ± 0.8**** |
| Estimated LV mass (mg) | 112 ± 5 | 101 ± 4 | 81 ± 2*** | 87 ± 3 |
| Estimated LV mass/BW (mg/g) | 3.76 ± 0.19 | 3.53 ± 0.10 | 3.68 ± 0.14 | 3.74 ± 0.21 |
| Estimated LV mass/TL (mg/mm) | 6.47 ± 0.29 | 5.90 ± 0.24 | 4.84 ± 0.13*** | 5.29 ± 0.19 |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM and analysed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 vs corresponding wildtype. Ex-LVEDD, external LV end diastolic dimension; Awd, anterior wall diastolic thickness; LVEDD, LV end diastolic dimension; PWd, posterior wall diastolic thickness; LVESD, LV end systolic dimension; BW, body weight; TL, tibial length