| Literature DB >> 34074290 |
Alexander R Pinto1,2, Rebecca H Ritchie3,4, Charles D Cohen5,6,7, Miles J De Blasio5, Man K S Lee8, Gabriella E Farrugia6, Darnel Prakoso5, Crisdion Krstevski6,7, Minh Deo5, Daniel G Donner9,10, Helen Kiriazis9,10, Michelle C Flynn8, Taylah L Gaynor6,7, Andrew J Murphy8, Grant R Drummond7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diabetes is associated with a significantly elevated risk of cardiovascular disease and its specific pathophysiology remains unclear. Recent studies have changed our understanding of cardiac cellularity, with cellular changes accompanying diabetes yet to be examined in detail. This study aims to characterise the changes in the cardiac cellular landscape in murine diabetes to identify potential cellular protagonists in the diabetic heart.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac cellularity; Diabetes; Echocardiography; Fibroblast; Flow cytometry
Year: 2021 PMID: 34074290 PMCID: PMC8170962 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-021-01303-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Fig. 1Differences in the abundance of major non-myocyte cell classes in the diabetic heart. A Flow cytometry contour plot displaying gating of major non-myocyte cell types for quantification of cell type proportion (summarised in B). For full gating strategy see Additional file 1: Figure S2. Endothelial cells (ECs; CD31+), resident mesenchymal cells (RMCs; CD31−CD45−) and leukocytes (Leuks; CD45+). B Proportions of major cell types in non-diabetic (ND; n = 7) and diabetic (DM; n = 19) mouse hearts. Individual sample values are shown with mean ± SEM. C Immunohistochemical analysis of the abundance of RMCs in ND and diabetic mouse heart left ventricles. Left and middle panels show representative confocal micrographs of mouse heart tissue stained for PCM1 and GATA4. PCM1+GATA4+ and PCM1−GATA4+ nuclei correspond to nuclei of cardiomyocytes (CM) and RMCs respectively. Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI. Right panel (box-plot) summarises proportion of nuclei corresponding to RMCs in ND (n = 9) vs. DM (n = 10) enumerated from micrographs. Whiskers of box-and-whisker plot indicate max and min. (D) As for C, heart left ventricle sections were stained with DACH1 to identify nuclei corresponding to endothelial cells in ND (n = 10) and DM (n = 9) left ventricles. *P < 0.05, **** P < 0.0001 (Student’s unpaired t-test). Scale bar = 100 µM
Fig. 2Differences in resident mesenchymal cell (RMC) subtypes in the diabetic heart. A Flow cytometry contour plots display gating strategy for cardiac RMCs and subsets (fibroblasts, SMCs, pericytes and Schwann cells) for quantifying RMC proportions (summarised in B). For full gating strategy see Additional file 1: Figure S2. B Proportions of RMC sub-classes in ND (n = 7) and diabetic (n = 19) mouse ventricles. Fibro: Fibroblast; Mural: Mural cells; SMCs: smooth muscle cells. Data is displayed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **** P < 0.0001 (Student’s unpaired t-test)
Fig. 3Ly6Chi monocytes, but not resident leukocytes are increased in the diabetic heart. A Flow cytometry contour plots display gating strategy for quantifying cardiac leukocytes (summarised in B). For full gating strategy see Additional file 1: Figure S2. B Proportions of leukocyte sub-types in ND (n = 7) and DM (n = 19) mouse ventricles. Data is displayed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 (Student’s unpaired t-test)
Fig. 4Mice with diabetes exhibit systemic monocytosis. A Flow cytometry contour plots display gating strategy for circulating leukocytes in whole blood (summarised in B and C). For full gating strategy see Additional file 1: Figure S2. B–C Proportions of circulating myeloid leukocytes and lymphocytes in ND (n = 7) vs. DM (n = 19) mice. Monocytes (Monos.), Ly6Chi monocytes (Ly6Chi), Neutrophils (Neuts.) and Ly6Clo monocytes (Ly6Clo). Data is displayed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 (Student’s unpaired t-test)
Fig. 5Bone marrow and spleen myelopoiesis evident in mice with diabetes. A Quantified proportions of bone marrow progenitor cells. LSK cells (Lineage−, Sca-1+, cKit+; haematopoietic stem cells), common myeloid progenitors (CMPs) and granulocyte myeloid progenitors (GMPs). B Proportions of spleen monocytes in ND (n = 7) vs. DM (n = 19) mice. C Proposed mechanism by which systemic monocytosis occurs in diabetic mice administered STZ-HFD. See Additional file 1: Figure S4 and S5 for full gating strategies for flow cytometry analysis. Data displayed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 (Student’s unpaired t-test)