| Literature DB >> 31652981 |
Asia Parveen1,2, Sher Alam Khan3, Muhammad Usman Mirza4, Hina Bashir5,6, Fatima Arshad7, Maria Iqbal8, Waseem Ahmad9, Ahsan Wahab10, Amal Fiaz11,12, Sidra Naz13, Fareeha Ashraf14, Tayyaba Mobeen15, Salman Aziz16,17, Syed Shoaib Ahmed18, Noor Muhammad19, Nehal F Hassib20, Mostafa I Mostafa21, Nagwa E Gaboon22, Roquyya Gul23, Saadullah Khan24, Matheus Froeyen25, Muhammad Shoaib26, Naveed Wasif27,28,29.
Abstract
The dental abnormalities are the typical features of many ectodermal dysplasias along with congenital malformations of nails, skin, hair, and sweat glands. However, several reports of non-syndromic/isolated tooth agenesis have also been found in the literature. The characteristic features of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (HED) comprise of hypodontia/oligodontia, along with hypohidrosis/anhidrosis, and hypotrichosis. Pathogenic variants in EDA, EDAR, EDARADD, and TRAF6, cause the phenotypic expression of HED. Genetic alterations in EDA and WNT10A cause particularly non-syndromic/isolated oligodontia. In the current project, we recruited 57 patients of 17 genetic pedigrees (A-Q) from different geographic regions of the world, including Pakistan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Syria. The molecular investigation of different syndromic and non-syndromic dental conditions, including hypodontia, oligodontia, generalized odontodysplasia, and dental crowding was carried out by using exome and Sanger sequencing. We have identified a novel missense variant (c.311G>A; p.Arg104His) in WNT10A in three oligodontia patients of family A, two novel sequence variants (c.207delinsTT, p.Gly70Trpfs*25 and c.1300T>G; p.Try434Gly) in EDAR in three patients of family B and four patients of family C, respectively. To better understand the structural and functional consequences of missense variants in WNT10A and EDAR on the stability of the proteins, we have performed extensive molecular dynamic (MD) simulations. We have also identified three previously reported pathogenic variants (c.1076T>C; p.Met359Thr), (c.1133C>T; p.Thr378Met) and (c.594_595insC; Gly201Argfs*39) in EDA in family D (four patients), E (two patients) and F (one patient), correspondingly. Presently, our data explain the genetic cause of 18 syndromic and non-syndromic tooth agenesis patients in six autosomal recessive and X-linked pedigrees (A-F), which expand the mutational spectrum of these unique clinical manifestations.Entities:
Keywords: EDA; EDAR; Hypodontia/oligodontia; Hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia; MD simulations; WNT10A; exome sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31652981 PMCID: PMC6862269 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20215282
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1(A–C) Pedigrees of family A, B, and C show the autosomal recessive mode of inheritance. The available samples for the genetic analyses are marked with asterisks (*). The genotypes of each participant in these pedigrees are mentioned below the symbols, showing the segregation of the alleles. The black color represents the wild-type allele and red color depicts the disease-allele (D) Orthopantomogram (OPG) of the affected member (IV-2), family A, revealed the absence of the majority of permanent teeth, except maxillary first molars, maxillary central incisors, maxillary right canine, and mandibular left first and second premolars and mandibular right first premolar (teeth # 16, 26, 11, 21, 13, 34, 35 and 44, respectively, according to FDI nomenclature). (E,F) A male patient (IV-3) of family B and a female patient (IV-5) of family C are showing pigmentation around lips and eyes, sparse scalp hair, eye-brows, and eye-lashes, saddle-shaped nose, and characteristic canonical teeth.
Figure 2Sequence analysis of WNT10A, EDAR, and EDA variants. (A) Panel A shows a partial sequence ofexon-4 of WNT10A in an affected member (IV-2) with novel homozygous missense variant (c.311G>A, p.Arg104His) and of an unaffected heterozygous carrier (III-2) in family A. (B) Panel B presents a partial sequence of exon-4 of EDAR in an affected (IV-3) and an unaffected member (III-1) of family B showing a novel frameshift variant (c.207delinsTT, p.Gly70Trpfs*25), where the homozygous deletion of C nucleotide and the simultaneous insertion of TT nucleotides is evident in the affected member sequence. (C) Panel C is showing a partial DNA sequence of exon-12 of EDAR representing a novel missense variant (c.1300T>G, p.Trp434Gly) in an affected member (IV-5) and a heterozygous carrier (III-1) of family C (D–F) Three EDA sequence variants are presented in panel D, E and F. Panel D and E are showing missense sequence variants (c.1076T>A, p.Met359Thr; c.1133C>T, p.Thr378Met) in affected members (IV-4) (II-3) and unaffected carriers (III-2) (I-2) of family D and E, respectively. The panel F is showing a de novo frameshift variant (c.594_595insC, Gly201Argfs*39) in the affected member (II-2) of family Fwhile themother (I-2) of this affected member shows a wild-type sequence in the same panel.
Structure validation of homology models using Molprobity and ProSA z-score.
| Models Using SWISS-MODEL | Molprobity | ProSA z-Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molprobity Score | Ram.Fav (%) | Ram.Out (%) | Rot.Out (%) | ||
|
| 1.45 | 91.3 | 2.81 | 2 | −6.82 |
| EDAR-wt | 1.98 | 92.94 | 2.35 | 2.6 | −6.34 |
| EDARADD | 1.82 | 90.91 | 3.21 | 2.84 | −6.02 |
Ram.Fav: Ramachandran Favored; Ram.Out: Ramachandran Outliers; Rot.Out: Rotamer Outliers. Molprobity score represents a single score as calculated from clash-score, Ramachandran, and Rotamer evaluations; wt: wild-type.
Estimated protein structure quantitative stability changes upon alterations.
| Mutated Models | DUET | ENCoM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus Prediction from mCSM and SDM (ΔΔG kcal.mol−1) | Vibrational Entropy Energy (ΔΔS vib kcal.mol−1.K−1) | Thermal Stability (ΔΔG kcal.mol−1) | |
| WNT10A-mt (Arg104His) | −1.431 (destabilizing) | 0.523 (increase in flexibility) | −0.348 (destabilizing) |
| EDAR-mt (Trp434Gly) | −2.762 (destabilizing) | 1.661 (increase in flexibility) | −1.329 (destabilizing) |
Figure 3Structural analysis of WNT10A complexed with Fz8-CRD. (A) Overall structural representation of WNT10A in complex with Fz8-CRD followed by a close-up of interatomic interactions with a substitution of Arg104His in WNT10A. Ribbon representations of domains with distinct color as N-terminal index finger (brown), central palm (cauliflower) and C-terminal thumb (gold) domains, while Fz8-CRD is displayed in green. (B) RMSD trajectories of WNT10A Cα-backbone atoms of mutant (red) and wild-type (blue) complexed with Fz8-CRD throughout 100ns. (C) RMSF trajectories of mutant (red) and wild-type (blue). (D) MM-GBSA trajectories (total of 1000 snapshots from the 100ns MD simulations) of mutant (red) and wild-type (blue) (E,F). Structural conformations of WNT10A/Fz8-CRD obtained after 20ns, 40ns, 60ns, 80ns, and 100ns are superimposed together.
Figure 4Structural analysis of EDAR complexed with EDARADD. (A) Interatomic interactions with a substitution of Trp to Gly at position 434 in EDAR. (B) RMSD trajectories of Cα-backbone atoms of mutant (brown) and wild-type (green) throughout 100ns. (C) Docked conformation of EDAR/EDARADD complex after 100 ns MD simulation, with exposed ribbon conformation of 5th α-helix of wt (green) and mt-EDAR (brown). (D) Per-residue decomposition analysis of 5th α-helix with the same color code as above.