| Literature DB >> 31652919 |
Carlos M Restrepo1, Alejandro Llanes2,3, Eymi M Cedeño4, Jim H Chang5, Jennifer Álvarez6, Margarita Ríos7, Homero Penagos8, José A Suárez9, Ricardo Lleonart10.
Abstract
Due to the absence of transcriptional regulation of gene expression in Leishmania parasites, it is now well accepted that several forms of genomic variations modulate the levels of critical proteins through changes in gene dosage. We previously observed many of these variations in our reference laboratory strain of L. panamensis (PSC-1 strain), including chromosomes with an increased somy and the presence of a putative linear minichromosome derived from chromosome 34. Here, we compared the previously described genomic variations with those occurring after exposure of this strain to increasing concentrations of trivalent antimony (SbIII), as well as those present in two geographically unrelated clinical isolates of L. panamensis. We observed changes in the somy of several chromosomes, amplifications of several chromosomal regions, and copy number variations in gene arrays after exposure to SbIII. Occurrence of amplifications potentially beneficial for the Sb-resistant phenotype appears to be associated with the loss of other forms of amplification, such as the linear minichromosome. In contrast, we found no evidence of changes in somy or amplification of relatively large chromosomal regions in the clinical isolates. In these isolates, the predominant amplifications appear to be those that generate genes arrays; however, in many cases, the amplified arrays have a notably higher number of copies than those from the untreated and Sb-treated laboratory samples.Entities:
Keywords: Leishmania panamensis; antimony resistance; genomic variations
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31652919 PMCID: PMC6896075 DOI: 10.3390/genes10110838
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Figure 1Variation of the EC50 value in a laboratory strain of L. panamensis exposed to increasing concentrations of antimony tartrate. Figure shows the dose–response curves for the untreated PSC-1 strain (A) and the final-stage parasite culture exposed to 2000 μM of SbIII (B). Response is shown as relative fluorescence units (RFU) measured as part of the resazurin assay.
Figure 2Variations in chromosome somy among all the samples included in this study. Estimates of the somy of each individual chromosome are shown for Sb-treated samples (A) and clinical isolates (B). The untreated PSC-1 strain is included as a control in both panels. Asterisks (*) indicate samples with values suggesting “intermediate” somy, defined as those estimated to be 0.5 units higher than the lower nearest integer by at least one of the methodologies used. In the heatmaps, values were approximated to the nearest integer to simplify the figure, using the following ranges: 2: ≥1.5, <2.5; 3: ≥2.5, <3.5; 4: ≥3.5, <4.5; 5: ≥4.5, <5.5 and 6: ≥5.5, <6.5.
Figure 3Relatively large chromosomal regions with differences in the estimated number of copies among different SbIII concentrations. (A) Amplification of a region of ~53 kb of chromosome 23 overlapping the H-locus. (B) Region of ~101 kb from chromosome 34, suspected to be amplified in the form of a linear minichromosome. ABCC: ABC transporter, type C family; ALG11: α-1,2-mannosyltransferase; BT1: biopterin transporter 1; HTBF: H region terbinafine-associated resistance gene; HUS1: checkpoint protein HUS1; MRPA: multidrug resistance protein A; PTR1: pteridine reductase 1.
Figure 4Relatively large subtelomeric deletion on chromosome 31. This deletion is estimated to be present in approximately half of the copies of this chromosome, spanning a region of 52 kb and affecting 20 protein-coding genes, including the one encoding aquaglyceroporin AQP1. The deletion is present in the PSC-1 reference strain even before exposure to SbIII, but it is not apparently present in clinical isolates BD-02 and RG-01. Except for those used for the isolates, colors in this figure follow the conventions used in Figure 3. CYP5: cyclophilin 5.
Protein-coding genes with different haploid copy number estimates among the samples included in this study 1.
| Gene | Suspected Function | Estimated Haploid Copy Number | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSC-1 | Treated Samples [SbIII] µM | RG-01 | BD-02 | ||||||||
| 50 | 100 | 200 | 400 | 800 | 1600 | 2000 | |||||
| LPMP_020120 | Phosphoglycan β-1,3-galactosyltransferase | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| LPMP_040170 | Hypothetical protein | 10 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 13 | 13 | 18 | 14 |
| LPMP_040280 | β-fructofuranosidase | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 5 |
| LPMP_050490 | ATPase α subunit | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| LPMP_060560 | 60S ribosomal protein L23a | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| LPMP_080610 | Amastin-like protein | 14 | 19 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 18 | 16 | 16 | 14 | 21 |
| LPMP_080680 | Tuzin | 22 | 30 | 27 | 27 | 26 | 28 | 27 | 26 | 39 | 34 |
| LPMP_080890 | Hypothetical protein | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| LPMP_090170 | Autophagy-related protein 8 (ATG8) | 13 | 19 | 20 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 19 | 19 | 20 | 16 |
| LPMP_100410 | GP63, leishmanolysin | 9 | 12 | 12 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 11 | 13 | 10 |
| LPMP_100440 | GP63, leishmanolysin | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| LPMP_130280 | α-tubulin | 19 | 21 | 22 | 22 | 23 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 26 | 24 |
| LPMP_160880 | Flagellar calcium-binding protein | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| LPMP_170080 | Elongation factor 1-α | 15 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 20 | 33 | 34 |
| LPMP_190790 | Autophagy-related protein 8 (ATG8) | 10 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 14 | 16 | 14 | 14 | 11 | 16 |
| LPMP_311770 | Ubiquitin-fusion protein | 32 | 28 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 28 | 22 | 23 | 51 | 50 |
| LPMP_330370 | Heat shock protein 83 | 12 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 13 | 13 | 16 | 12 |
| LPMP_330860 | β-tubulin | 34 | 45 | 43 | 43 | 43 | 44 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 34 |
| LPMP_331700 | Peptidase M20/M25/M40 | 12 | 15 | 14 | 15 | 15 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 15 | 12 |
1 This table does not include the genes located within relatively large regions suspected to be episomic amplifications, as well as other forms of subtelomeric variations, all of which also have a different gene dosage.