Literature DB >> 31652400

Identification and Profiling of Environmental Chemicals That Inhibit the TGFβ/SMAD Signaling Pathway.

Zhengxi Wei1, Srilatha Sakamuru1, Li Zhang1, Jinghua Zhao1, Ruili Huang1, Nicole C Kleinstreuer2, Yanling Chen3, Yan Shu4, Thomas B Knudsen5, Menghang Xia1.   

Abstract

The transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) superfamily of secreted signaling molecules and their cognate receptors regulate cell fate and behaviors relevant to many developmental and disease processes. Disruption of TGFβ signaling during embryonic development can, for example, affect morphogenesis and differentiation through complex pathways that may be SMAD (Small Mothers Against Decapentaplegic) dependent or SMAD independent. In the present study, the SMAD Binding Element (SBE)-beta lactamase (bla) HEK 293T cell line, which responds to the activation of the SMAD2/3/4 complex, was used in a quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) assay to identify potential TGFβ disruptors in the Tox21 10K compound library. From the primary screening we identified several kinase inhibitors, organometallic compounds, and dithiocarbamates (DTCs) that inhibited TGFβ1-induced SMAD signaling of reporter gene activation independent of cytotoxicity. Counterscreen of SBE antagonists on human embryonic neural stem cells demonstrated cytotoxicity, providing additional evidence to support evaluation of these compounds for developmental toxicity. We profiled the inhibitory patterns of putative SBE antagonists toward other developmental signaling pathways, including wingless-related integration site (WNT), retinoic acid α receptor (RAR), and sonic hedgehog (SHH). The profiling results from SBE-bla assay identify chemicals that disrupt TGFβ/SMAD signaling as part of an integrated qHTS approach for prioritizing putative developmental toxicants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31652400      PMCID: PMC7341485          DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  59 in total

1.  Combinatorial activities of Smad2 and Smad3 regulate mesoderm formation and patterning in the mouse embryo.

Authors:  N Ray Dunn; Stéphane D Vincent; Leif Oxburgh; Elizabeth J Robertson; Elizabeth K Bikoff
Journal:  Development       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 6.868

2.  Developmental lead exposure impairs contextual fear conditioning and reduces adult hippocampal neurogenesis in the rat brain.

Authors:  Külli Jaako-Movits; Tamara Zharkovsky; Olga Romantchik; Monika Jurgenson; Eda Merisalu; Lenne-Triin Heidmets; Alexander Zharkovsky
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 2.457

3.  Phenotypic screening of the ToxCast chemical library to classify toxic and therapeutic mechanisms.

Authors:  Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Jian Yang; Ellen L Berg; Thomas B Knudsen; Ann M Richard; Matthew T Martin; David M Reif; Richard S Judson; Mark Polokoff; David J Dix; Robert J Kavlock; Keith A Houck
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Inhibition of the transforming growth factor-β/SMAD cascade mitigates the anti-neurogenic effects of the carbamate pesticide carbofuran.

Authors:  Brashket Seth; Anuradha Yadav; Swati Agarwal; Shashi Kant Tiwari; Rajnish Kumar Chaturvedi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Current developments in reproductive toxicity testing of pesticides.

Authors:  Ralph L Cooper
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 6.  Neurotoxicity of the pesticidal carbamates.

Authors:  D B Miller
Journal:  Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec

Review 7.  TGF-beta in dopamine neuron development, maintenance and neuroprotection.

Authors:  Eleni Roussa; Oliver von Bohlen und Halbach; Kerstin Krieglstein
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Resolving the Combinatorial Complexity of Smad Protein Complex Formation and Its Link to Gene Expression.

Authors:  Philippe Lucarelli; Marcel Schilling; Clemens Kreutz; Artyom Vlasov; Martin E Boehm; Nao Iwamoto; Bernhard Steiert; Susen Lattermann; Marvin Wäsch; Markus Stepath; Matthias S Matter; Mathias Heikenwälder; Katrin Hoffmann; Daniela Deharde; Georg Damm; Daniel Seehofer; Maria Muciek; Norbert Gretz; Wolf D Lehmann; Jens Timmer; Ursula Klingmüller
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 10.304

9.  Identification of compounds that modulate retinol signaling using a cell-based qHTS assay.

Authors:  Yanling Chen; Srilatha Sakamuru; Ruili Huang; David H Reese; Menghang Xia
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  WNT signaling in neuronal maturation and synaptogenesis.

Authors:  Silvana B Rosso; Nibaldo C Inestrosa
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 5.505

View more
  3 in total

1.  Predicting Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Based On the Combination of Chemical Structures and Biological Data.

Authors:  Heather L Ciallella; Daniel P Russo; Swati Sharma; Yafan Li; Eddie Sloter; Len Sweet; Heng Huang; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 11.357

Review 2.  Use of Tox21 Screening Data to Evaluate the COVID-19 Drug Candidates for Their Potential Toxic Effects and Related Pathways.

Authors:  Srilatha Sakamuru; Ruili Huang; Menghang Xia
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.988

3.  Molecular Image-Based Prediction Models of Nuclear Receptor Agonists and Antagonists Using the DeepSnap-Deep Learning Approach with the Tox21 10K Library.

Authors:  Yasunari Matsuzaka; Yoshihiro Uesawa
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 4.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.