Literature DB >> 35451820

Predicting Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Based On the Combination of Chemical Structures and Biological Data.

Heather L Ciallella1, Daniel P Russo1,2, Swati Sharma1, Yafan Li3, Eddie Sloter3, Len Sweet3, Heng Huang4, Hao Zhu1,2.   

Abstract

For hazard identification, classification, and labeling purposes, animal testing guidelines are required by law to evaluate the developmental toxicity potential of new and existing chemical products. However, guideline developmental toxicity studies are costly, time-consuming, and require many laboratory animals. Computational modeling has emerged as a promising, animal-sparing, and cost-effective method for evaluating the developmental toxicity potential of chemicals, such as endocrine disruptors, without the use of animals. We aimed to develop a predictive and explainable computational model for developmental toxicants. To this end, a comprehensive dataset of 1244 chemicals with developmental toxicity classifications was curated from public repositories and literature sources. Data from 2140 toxicological high-throughput screening assays were extracted from PubChem and the ToxCast program for this dataset and combined with information about 834 chemical fragments to group assays based on their chemical-mechanistic relationships. This effort revealed two assay clusters containing 83 and 76 assays, respectively, with high positive predictive rates for developmental toxicants identified with animal testing guidelines (PPV = 72.4 and 77.3% during cross-validation). These two assay clusters can be used as developmental toxicity models and were applied to predict new chemicals for external validation. This study provides a new strategy for constructing alternative chemical developmental toxicity evaluations that can be replicated for other toxicity modeling studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  big data; chemical fragments; developmental toxicity; high-throughput screening data; read-across

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35451820      PMCID: PMC9191745          DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c01040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   11.357


  113 in total

1.  Correlation of chemical structure with reproductive and developmental toxicity as it relates to the use of the threshold of toxicological concern.

Authors:  Michael C Laufersweiler; Bernard Gadagbui; Irene M Baskerville-Abraham; Andrew Maier; Alison Willis; Anthony R Scialli; Gregory J Carr; Susan P Felter; Karen Blackburn; George Daston
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  High-throughput identification of small molecules that affect human embryonic vascular development.

Authors:  Helena Vazão; Susana Rosa; Tânia Barata; Ricardo Costa; Patrícia R Pitrez; Inês Honório; Margreet R de Vries; Dimitri Papatsenko; Rui Benedito; Daniel Saris; Ali Khademhosseini; Paul H A Quax; Carlos F Pereira; Nadia Mercader; Hugo Fernandes; Lino Ferreira
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Functions of AP1 (Fos/Jun) in bone development.

Authors:  E F Wagner
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 4.  Advancing Computational Toxicology in the Big Data Era by Artificial Intelligence: Data-Driven and Mechanism-Driven Modeling for Chemical Toxicity.

Authors:  Heather L Ciallella; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 3.739

5.  The human constitutive androstane receptor promotes the differentiation and maturation of hepatic-like cells.

Authors:  Fengming Chen; Stephanie M Zamule; Denise M Coslo; Tao Chen; Curtis J Omiecinski
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 6.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptors: diversity and evolution.

Authors:  Mark E Hahn
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2002-09-20       Impact factor: 5.192

7.  Identification and Profiling of Environmental Chemicals That Inhibit the TGFβ/SMAD Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Zhengxi Wei; Srilatha Sakamuru; Li Zhang; Jinghua Zhao; Ruili Huang; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Yanling Chen; Yan Shu; Thomas B Knudsen; Menghang Xia
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 8.  Developmental toxicity of estrogenic chemicals on rodents and other species.

Authors:  Taisen Iguchi; Hajime Watanabe; Yoshinao Katsu; Takeshi Mizutani; Shinichi Miyagawa; Atsuko Suzuki; Satomi Kohno; Kiyoaki Sone; Hideo Kato
Journal:  Congenit Anom (Kyoto)       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.409

9.  Developmental toxicity of cryptotanshinone on the early-life stage of zebrafish development.

Authors:  C Wang; T Wang; B-W Lian; S Lai; S Li; Y-M Li; W-J Tan; B Wang; W Mei
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  CERAPP: Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project.

Authors:  Kamel Mansouri; Ahmed Abdelaziz; Aleksandra Rybacka; Alessandra Roncaglioni; Alexander Tropsha; Alexandre Varnek; Alexey Zakharov; Andrew Worth; Ann M Richard; Christopher M Grulke; Daniela Trisciuzzi; Denis Fourches; Dragos Horvath; Emilio Benfenati; Eugene Muratov; Eva Bay Wedebye; Francesca Grisoni; Giuseppe F Mangiatordi; Giuseppina M Incisivo; Huixiao Hong; Hui W Ng; Igor V Tetko; Ilya Balabin; Jayaram Kancherla; Jie Shen; Julien Burton; Marc Nicklaus; Matteo Cassotti; Nikolai G Nikolov; Orazio Nicolotti; Patrik L Andersson; Qingda Zang; Regina Politi; Richard D Beger; Roberto Todeschini; Ruili Huang; Sherif Farag; Sine A Rosenberg; Svetoslav Slavov; Xin Hu; Richard S Judson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prediction of drug-induced liver injury and cardiotoxicity using chemical structure and in vitro assay data.

Authors:  Lin Ye; Deborah K Ngan; Tuan Xu; Zhichao Liu; Jinghua Zhao; Srilatha Sakamuru; Li Zhang; Tongan Zhao; Menghang Xia; Anton Simeonov; Ruili Huang
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Prioritization of chemicals in food for risk assessment by integrating exposure estimates and new approach methodologies: A next generation risk assessment case study.

Authors:  Mirjam Luijten; R Corinne Sprong; Emiel Rorije; Leo T M van der Ven
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-09-19

3.  Computational model for fetal skeletal defects potentially linked to disruption of retinoic acid signaling.

Authors:  Jocylin D Pierro; Bhavesh K Ahir; Nancy C Baker; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Menghang Xia; Thomas B Knudsen
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 5.988

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.