Literature DB >> 31650543

Insights into implementation of routine depression screening and psychosocial assessment in a private hospital setting: A qualitative study.

Nicole Reilly1,2, Elloise Brake2, Harish Kalra3,4, Marie-Paule Austin2,5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies continue to show that women who give birth in the private maternity sector are less likely to receive depression screening and psychosocial assessment as a routine component of maternity care. However, examples of successfully implemented routine psychosocial assessment programs are beginning to emerge, and there is great value in better understanding the factors that can contribute to the successful delivery of emotional health care in this context. AIM: The aim of this study was to identify factors that facilitated successful implementation of antenatal psychosocial assessment in a private hospital setting.
METHODS: This study employed a qualitative research design. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore the views and experiences of health professionals involved in implementation of the program at the participating site.
RESULTS: Nine health professionals participated in the study (three midwives, three obstetricians, two managers and one mental health worker). Factors that facilitated successful implementation of the program were reflected in five key themes: (i) multidisciplinary support for the program; (ii) training and clinical supervision; (iii) allocation of sufficient resources; (iv) availability of local referral pathways; and (v) normalisation of the process.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that barriers to implementation of perinatal depression screening and psychosocial assessment are surmountable and will provide confidence to other services, that routine 'mental health assessment' as required under updated Medical Benefits Scheme items for obstetric services, can be successfully implemented and sustained in private hospital settings.
© 2019 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antenatal; depression screening; implementation; perinatal; private maternity; psychosocial assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31650543     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  4 in total

1.  Saving time, signaling trust: Using the PROMOTE self-report screening instrument to enhance prenatal care quality and therapeutic relationships.

Authors:  Heidi Preis; Clare Whitney; Christina Kocis; Marci Lobel
Journal:  PEC Innov       Date:  2022-03-23

2.  Missingness patterns in a comprehensive instrument identifying psychosocial and substance use risk in antenatal care.

Authors:  Heidi Preis; Petar M Djurić; Marzieh Ajirak; Vibha Mane; David J Garry; Diana Garretto; Kimberly Herrera; Cassandra Heiselman; Lobel Marci
Journal:  J Reprod Infant Psychol       Date:  2021-11-17

3.  Characteristics and co-admissions of mothers and babies admitted to residential parenting services in the year following birth in NSW: a linked population data study (2000-2012).

Authors:  Hannah Grace Dahlen; Virginia Schmied; Cathrine Fowler; Lilian L Peters; Simone Ormsby; Charlene Thornton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 4.  Implementation science in maternity care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Ann Dadich; Annika Piper; Dominiek Coates
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 7.327

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.