Literature DB >> 35465253

Saving time, signaling trust: Using the PROMOTE self-report screening instrument to enhance prenatal care quality and therapeutic relationships.

Heidi Preis1,2, Clare Whitney3, Christina Kocis2, Marci Lobel1,2.   

Abstract

Objectives: Comprehensive screening of psychosocial vulnerabilities and substance use in prenatal care is critical to promote the health and well-being of pregnant patients. Effective implementation of new screening procedures and instruments should be accompanied by an in-depth investigation to assess their feasibility and impact on care delivery.
Methods: In 2020, following implementation of the Profile for Maternal and Obstetric Treatment Effectiveness (PROMOTE) an innovative self-report screening instrument developed for outpatient prenatal clinics in the U.S., we conducted individual interviews and focus groups with twenty-two midwives, nurse practitioners, and obstetric residents focused on the PROMOTE and its impacts on care delivery. We used interpretive description for the qualitative analysis of the interviews.
Results: Five themes were identified: Guiding Time Efficiently: "The Time I Don't Have," Preventing Missed Care, Signaling Trustworthiness, Establishing Trauma-Informed Foundations, and Promoting "Honest" Patient Disclosure.
Conclusion: Interviews suggest that patient completion of the PROMOTE before the medical encounter helps reduce previously reported barriers, is more time-effective, and makes history-taking easier. It also facilitates the patient-provider relationship. Innovation: Findings offer insight into the breadth and depth of clinical impact resulting from the PROMOTE, and provide guidance for the implementation of such tools to optimize health outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prenatal care; Psychosocial screening; Qualitative implementation research

Year:  2022        PMID: 35465253      PMCID: PMC9020232          DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2022.100030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PEC Innov        ISSN: 2772-6282


  34 in total

1.  Addressing the Missing Part of Evidence-based Practice: The Importance of Respecting Clinical Judgment in the Process of Adopting a New Screening Tool for Postpartum Depression.

Authors:  Vered Ben-David; Melissa Jonson-Reid; Ron Tompkins
Journal:  Issues Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 1.835

Review 2.  Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge.

Authors:  S Thorne; S R Kirkham; J MacDonald-Emes
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 343: psychosocial risk factors: perinatal screening and intervention.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Barriers to antenatal psychosocial assessment and depression screening in private hospital settings.

Authors:  Tanya Connell; Bryanne Barnett; Donna Waters
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Perceived social support interacts with prenatal depression to predict birth outcomes.

Authors:  Kimberly J Nylen; Michael W O'Hara; Jane Engeldinger
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-06-19

6.  Accuracy of five self-report screening instruments for substance use in pregnancy.

Authors:  Steven J Ondersma; Grace Chang; Tiffany Blake-Lamb; Kathryn Gilstad-Hayden; John Orav; Jessica R Beatty; Gregory L Goyert; Kimberly A Yonkers
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  A qualitative study of women's views on the acceptability of being asked about mental health problems at antenatal booking appointments.

Authors:  Emma Yapp; Louise M Howard; Meeriam Kadicheeni; Laurence A Telesia; Jeanette Milgrom; Kylee Trevillion
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 2.372

8.  Patient versus professional based psychosocial risk factor screening for adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Chantal Quispel; Mieke J van Veen; Christianne Zuijderhoudt; Eric A P Steegers; Witte J G Hoogendijk; Erwin Birnie; Gouke J Bonsel; Mijke P Lambregtse-van den Berg
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2014-11

Review 9.  The role of screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment in the perinatal period.

Authors:  Tricia E Wright; Mishka Terplan; Steven J Ondersma; Cheryl Boyce; Kimberly Yonkers; Grace Chang; Andreea A Creanga
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Negotiating policy in practice: child and family health nurses' approach to the process of postnatal psychosocial assessment.

Authors:  Mellanie Rollans; Virginia Schmied; Lynn Kemp; Tanya Meade
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  1 in total

1.  Applying machine learning methods to psychosocial screening data to improve identification of prenatal depression: Implications for clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Heidi Preis; Petar M Djurić; Marzieh Ajirak; Tong Chen; Vibha Mane; David J Garry; Cassandra Heiselman; Joseph Chappelle; Marci Lobel
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 4.405

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.