Literature DB >> 34787528

Missingness patterns in a comprehensive instrument identifying psychosocial and substance use risk in antenatal care.

Heidi Preis1, Petar M Djurić2, Marzieh Ajirak2, Vibha Mane2, David J Garry3, Diana Garretto3, Kimberly Herrera3, Cassandra Heiselman3, Lobel Marci1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychosocial vulnerabilities (e.g. inadequate social support, financial insecurity, stress) and substance use elevate risks for adverse perinatal outcomes and maternal mental health morbidities. However, various barriers, including paucity of validated, simple and usable comprehensive instruments, impede execution of the recommendations to screen for such vulnerabilities in the first antenatal care visit. The current study presents findings from a newly implemented self-report tool created to overcome screening barriers in outpatient antenatal clinics.
METHODS: This was a retrospective chart-review of 904 women who completed the Profile for Maternal & Obstetric Treatment Effectiveness (PROMOTE) during their first antenatal visit between June and December 2019. The PROMOTE includes the 4-item NIDA Quick Screen and 15 additional items that each assess a different psychosocial vulnerability. Statistical analysis included evaluation of missing data, and exploration of missing data patterns using univariate correlations and hierarchical clustering.
RESULTS: Three quarters of women (70.0%) had no missing items. In the entire sample, all but four PROMOTE items (opioid use, planned pregnancy, educational level, and financial state) had < 5% missing values, suggesting good acceptability and feasibility. Several respondent-related characteristics such as lower education, less family support, and greater stress were associated with greater likelihood of missing items. Instrument-related characteristics associated with missing values were completing the PROMOTE in Spanish or question positioning at the end of the instrument. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Conducting a comprehensive screening of theoretically and clinically meaningful vulnerabilities in an outpatient setting is feasible. Study findings will inform modifications of the PROMOTE and subsequent digitisation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Psychosocial screening; antenatal care; instrument evaluation; missingness patterns; substance use risk

Year:  2021        PMID: 34787528      PMCID: PMC9110558          DOI: 10.1080/02646838.2021.2004302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Infant Psychol        ISSN: 0264-6838


  39 in total

1.  Nonmedical Use of Prescription Opioids among Pregnant U.S. Women.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Amy J Graves; Robert Levy; Stephen W Patrick
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2017-04-11

2.  Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) in Primary Care in Integrated Health Care Settings.

Authors:  Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Jennifer M Boggs; Carmen Martin; David W Price; Arne Beck; Thomas E Backer; James W Dearing
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 3.716

3.  Is Preconception Substance Use Associated With Unplanned or Poorly Timed Pregnancy?

Authors:  Lisbet S Lundsberg; Stephanie Peglow; Neena Qasba; Kimberly A Yonkers; Aileen M Gariepy
Journal:  J Addict Med       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.702

4.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 343: psychosocial risk factors: perinatal screening and intervention.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Commentary on Ondersma et al. (2019): Will better self-report screening instruments be enough to detect drug use during pregnancy?

Authors:  Joseph J Palamar
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 6.  Contributions of psychology to research, treatment, and care of pregnant women with opioid use disorder.

Authors:  Heidi Preis; Elizabeth M Inman; Marci Lobel
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2020-09

7.  Screening and Brief Interventions for Alcohol and Other Drug Use Among Pregnant Women Attending Midwife Obstetric Units in Cape Town, South Africa: A Qualitative Study of the Views of Health Care Professionals.

Authors:  Petal Petersen Williams; Zaino Petersen; Katherine Sorsdahl; Catherine Mathews; Katherine Everett-Murphy; Charles D H Parry
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  A psychosocial risk assessment model (PRAM) for use with pregnant and postpartum women in primary care settings.

Authors:  S R Priest; M-P Austin; B B Barnett; A Buist
Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 3.633

9.  Obstetric care providers are able to assess psychosocial risks, identify and refer high-risk pregnant women: validation of a short assessment tool - the KINDEX Greek version.

Authors:  Andria Spyridou; Maggie Schauer; Martina Ruf-Leuschner
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Screening for Pregnancy Status in a Population-Based Sample: Characteristics Associated with Item Nonresponse.

Authors:  Suzanne C Hughes; Carol J Hogue; Melissa A Clark; Jessica E Graber; Elaine D Eaker; Amy H Herring
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-03
View more
  1 in total

1.  Saving time, signaling trust: Using the PROMOTE self-report screening instrument to enhance prenatal care quality and therapeutic relationships.

Authors:  Heidi Preis; Clare Whitney; Christina Kocis; Marci Lobel
Journal:  PEC Innov       Date:  2022-03-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.