| Literature DB >> 31649847 |
Feng Zhou1, Jingtian Mei1, Xiuguo Han1, Hanjun Li1, Shengbing Yang1, Minqi Wang1, Linyang Chu1, Han Qiao1, Tingting Tang1.
Abstract
The objective was to investigate the effect of kinsenoside (Kin) treatments on macrophage polarity and evaluate the resulting protection of chondrocytes to attenuate osteoarthritis (OA) progression. RAW264.7 macrophages were polarized to M1/M2 subtypes then administered with different concentrations of Kin. The polarization transitions were evaluated with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), confocal observation and flow cytometry analysis. The mechanism of Kin repolarizing M1 macrophages was evaluated by Western blot. Further, macrophage conditioned medium (CM) and IL-1β were administered to chondrocytes. Micro-CT scanning and histological observations were conducted in vivo on anterior cruciate ligament transection (ACLT) mice with or without Kin treatment. We found that Kin repolarized M1 macrophages to the M2 phenotype. Mechanistically, Kin inhibited the phosphorylation of IκBα, which further reduced the downstream phosphorylation of P65 in nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signaling. Moreover, Kin inhibited mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) signaling molecules p-JNK, p-ERK and p-P38. Additionally, Kin attenuated macrophage CM and IL-1β-induced chondrocyte damage. In vivo, Kin reduced the infiltration of M1 macrophages, promoted M2 macrophages in the synovium, inhibited subchondral bone destruction and reduced articular cartilage damage induced by ACLT. All the results indicated that Kin is an effective therapeutic candidate for OA treatment.Entities:
Keywords: AP-1, activator protein-1; Arg-1, arginase-1; BV, bone volume; BV/TV, bone volume/total tissue volume; C/EBP β, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β; CM, conditioned medium; Chondrocytes; DMEM, Dulbecco׳s minimum essential medium; GA, gouty arthritis; H&E, hematoxylin & eosin; HUVECs, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; IFN-γ, interferon-γ; IRF4, interferon regulatory factor 4; Kin, kinsenoside; Kinsenoside; LPS, lipopolysaccharides; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinases; MSU, monosodium urate; Macrophages; NF-κB, nuclear factor-κB; NSAIDs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; OA, osteoarthritis; OARSI, Osteoarthritis Research Society International; Osteoarthritis; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ; Polarization; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; ROS, reactive oxygen species; S&F, safranin O-fast green; TLRs, toll-like receptors; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; Tb.N, trabecular number; Tb.Sp, trabecular separation; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase
Year: 2019 PMID: 31649847 PMCID: PMC6804452 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2019.01.015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Pharm Sin B ISSN: 2211-3835 Impact factor: 11.413
Figure 1Effects of Kin on macrophage repolarization in vitro. (A) QRT-PCR was conducted to determine the expression levels of the M1-related genes IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-12 and iNOS/Arg-1. (B) M1 macrophage marker CD16/32 and M2 macrophage marker CD206 were examined by immunostaining. (C) Flow cytometry evaluated macrophage subsets by staining CD16/32 and CD206. *P<0.01 compared with RAW264.7 group; #P<0.05, ##P<0.01 compared with M1 group. Scale=50 μm.
Figure 2Effects of Kin on signaling pathways related to macrophage polarization. Western blot showed that Kin affected NF-κB signal-related proteins IKK/p-IKK, IκBα/p-IκBα, and P65/p-P65 (A) and MAPK signal-related proteins p-JNK/JNK, p-ERK/ERK and p-P38/P38 (B). *P<0.05, **P<0.01 compared with RAW264.7 group; #P<0.01, ##P<0.01 compared with the 100 ng/mL LPS plus 20 ng/mL IFN-γ group.
Figure 3Effect of Kin on M2 macrophage polarization. M2-related genes Mgl1, Mgl2, Pgc1-β, Arg-1, Il-10 and Cd206 were assessed by qRT-PCR (A). (B) M2 macrophage marker CD206 was examined by immunostaining. (C) Flow cytometry evaluated macrophage subsets by staining CD206. (D) The expression of p-STAT6/STAT6 was assessed by Western blot. Scale=50 μm.
Figure 4Macrophage CM and co-culture with chondrocytes. For the co-culture assay, the components of macrophage CM (IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, iNOS and Arg-1) were measured by ELISA kit (A). S&F (B) and toluidine blue staining (C) in chondrocytes cultured with macrophage CM for 3 days. (D) Apoptosis rates for macrophage CM-stimulated chondrocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry with annexin V-FITC/PI apoptosis analysis. (E) Cell viability was evaluated in chondrocytes treated with macrophage CM by CCK-8. (F) Apoptosis-related proteins (BAX, BCL-2, cleaved caspase-3, caspase-3) were monitored by western blot. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 compared with RAW264.7-CM group; #P<0.05, ##P<0.01 compared with LPS+IFN-γ-CM group. Scale=20 μm.
Figure 5Effects of Kin on IL-1β-induced chondrocyte apoptosis and expression of related genes. (A) Apoptosis rates for IL-1β-stimulated chondrocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry with annexin V-FITC/PI analysis. (B) The caspase-3 activity was detected by the caspase-3 activity assay. Absorbance at 405 nm was used to quantify caspase-3 activation. The results were normalized to the control group. (C) Apoptosis-related proteins (BAX, BCL-2, cleaved caspase-3, caspase-3) were evaluated with Western blot. (D) QRT-PCR was performed to determine the expression levels of IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, iNOS, COX-2, MMP-3, MMP-13, aggrecan and ADAMTS5 in chondrocytes under IL-1β stimulation. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 compared with 0 μg/mL Kin; #P<0.05, ##P<0.01 compared with the 10 ng/mL IL-1β group.
Figure 6μCT evaluations of Kin-treated OA induced by ACLT. (A) Three-dimensional μCT images of frontal views of the knee joints at 4 weeks after sham operation or ACLT operation. (B) Sagittal views of medial compartment subchondral bone. (C) Quantitative analysis of BV, BV/TV, Tb.Sp, Tb.N and Tb.Th. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 compared with the control group; #P<0.05 compared with the ACLT group. Scale=1 mm.
Figure 7Staining evaluations of Kin in OA induced by ACLT. (A) and (A1) Synovial membrane of medial compartment was stained with H&E. Synovial macrophages were identified by F4/80 (B) immunohistochemistry, moreover, CD16/32 (C) was chosen for marking M1-type macrophages and CD206 (D) for M2-type macrophages. Medial compartment cartilage and subchondral bone of knee joints were stained by S&F (E) and H&E (F). Aggrecan immunohistochemistry of knee joint medial compartment cartilage (G). (H) Quantitative analysis of synovitis score, synovial macrophages M1 and M2, OARSI score and aggrecan. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 compared with the control group; #P<0.05, ##P<0.01 compared with the ACLT group.