| Literature DB >> 20678201 |
Miriam Bellido1, Laura Lugo, Jorge A Roman-Blas, Santos Castañeda, Jose R Caeiro, Sonia Dapia, Emilio Calvo, Raquel Largo, Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis (OP) increases cartilage damage in a combined rabbit model of OP and osteoarthritis (OA). Accordingly, we assessed whether microstructure impairment at subchondral bone aggravates cartilage damage in this experimental model.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20678201 PMCID: PMC2945051 DOI: 10.1186/ar3103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arthritis Res Ther ISSN: 1478-6354 Impact factor: 5.156
Figure 1Experimental design. This study evaluated the effect of increased remodelling on subchondral bone microstructure and biomechanical-related genometrics in a combined rabbit model of osteoarthritis (OA) aggravated by previous osteoporosis (OP). (a)Experimental scheme. OVX: ovariectomy; MPH: methylprednisolone hemysuccinate. (b)Qualitative 2D models were reconstructed from images selected of a highly representative sample for each group (HEALTHY, OA, OP and OPOA), by using the CTAn software (Skyscan, Aartselaar, Belgium).
Figure 2Microstructure parameters at subchondral bone. (a)Bone area fraction (B.Ar/T.Ar), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular number (Tb.N) and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) were assessed at subchondral bone. (b)Subchondral plate thickness. (c)Biomechanical-related structural parameters, fractal dimension (FD) and polar moment of inertia (Ip), at subchondral bone. HEALTHY (n = 7), OA (n = 7), OP (n = 8) and OPOA (n = 8) knees. OA, osteoarthritis; OP, osteoporosis. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM; *P < 0.05 vs. HEALTHY, #P < 0.05 vs. OA.
Figure 3Remodelling parameters at subchondral bone and systemic level. (a)Alkaline hosphatise (ALP) and metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) protein expressions at subchondral bone. At top: Densitometric analysis of ALP and MMP9 protein expressions at subchondral bone. At bottom: representative Western Blot images of ALP and MMP9 for 40 μg of total subchondral bone protein. The number of samples assayed for ALP expression were: HEALTHY n = 10; OA n = 8; OP n = 8 and OPOA n = 10, and for MMP9 were: n = 6 in each group. OA, osteoarthritis; OP, osteoporosis (b)Enzymatic activity for ALP and tartrato-resistant alkaline phosphatase (TRAP) in serum from OP animals (OP and OPOA groups; n = 8; white bars) and non-OP animals (healthy and OA groups; n = 7; black bars). OA, osteoarthritis; OP, osteoporosis. Bar represents the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 vs. HEALTHY, #P < 0.05 vs. OA.
Figure 4Osteoprotegerin (OPG) and receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANKL) protein expression at subchondral bone. Densitometric analysis of OPG, RAKL and OPG/RANKL ratio, as well as, representative Western Blot images for OPG and RANKL are shown. To perform this blot, 40 μg of total protein from subchondral bone was used for HEALTHY, OA, OP and OPOA groups (n = 6, each group). OA: osteoarthritis; OP: osteoporosis. Data are displayed as arbitrary units ± SEM. *P < 0.05 vs. HEALTHY, #P < 0.05 vs. OA, &P < 0.05 vs. OP.
Figure 5Total Mankin score of histological cartilage damage. The assessment was carried out at the weight bearing area of medial femoral condyle. HEALTHY (n = 7), OA (n = 7), OP (n = 8) and OPOA (n = 8) knees. OA: osteoarthritis; OP: osteoporosis. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM; *P < 0.05 vs. HEALTHY, #P < 0.05 vs. OA, &P < 0.05 vs. OP.
Associations between structural, remodelling and molecular parameters at subchondral bone, and cartilage damage score
| B.Ar/T.Ar% | Sb. Th | FD | Ip | ALP | MMP9 | OPG/RANKL | MANKIN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.000 | ||||||||
| 0.381* | 1.000 | |||||||
| -0.861** | -0.450* | 1.000 | ||||||
| 0.963** | 0.347 | -0.868** | 1.000 | |||||
| 0.814** | 0.453 | -0.754** | 0.718** | 1.000 | ||||
| -0.115 | -0.195 | 0.262 | -0.094 | -0.311 | 1.000 | |||
| -0.280 | -0.120 | 0.340 | -0.247 | -0.054 | 0.500* | 1.000 | ||
| -0.627** | -0.626** | 0.672** | -0.598** | -0.788** | 0.460 | 0.341 | 1.000 |
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
** Correlation is significant at the 0.001 level (2-tailed).
The correlation coefficients represented in this table are obtained comparing the healthy, OA, OP and OPOA groups by Spearman bivariate analysis.
B.Ar/T.Ar%, bone area fraction; FD, fractal dimension; Ip, polar moment of inertia; MANKIN, cartilage histopathological Mankin grading scorel; MMP9, metalloproteinase 9; OA, osteoarthritis; OP, osteoporosis; OPG/RANKL ratio, osteoprotegerin/receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ratio; Sb.Th, subchondral plate thickness.