Literature DB >> 31649199

Higher-fitness yeast genotypes are less robust to deleterious mutations.

Milo S Johnson1,2,3, Alena Martsul4, Sergey Kryazhimskiy5, Michael M Desai6,2,3,7.   

Abstract

Natural selection drives populations toward higher fitness, but second-order selection for adaptability and mutational robustness can also influence evolution. In many microbial systems, diminishing-returns epistasis contributes to a tendency for more-fit genotypes to be less adaptable, but no analogous patterns for robustness are known. To understand how robustness varies across genotypes, we measure the fitness effects of hundreds of individual insertion mutations in a panel of yeast strains. We find that more-fit strains are less robust: They have distributions of fitness effects with lower mean and higher variance. These differences arise because many mutations have more strongly deleterious effects in faster-growing strains. This negative correlation between fitness and robustness implies that second-order selection for robustness will tend to conflict with first-order selection for fitness.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31649199     DOI: 10.1126/science.aay4199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  17 in total

1.  Bulk-Fitness Measurements Using Barcode Sequencing Analysis in Yeast.

Authors:  Claire A Chochinov; Alex N Nguyen Ba
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  Genetic basis of a spontaneous mutation's expressivity.

Authors:  Rachel Schell; Joseph J Hale; Martin N Mullis; Takeshi Matsui; Ryan Foree; Ian M Ehrenreich
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Mutational robustness changes during long-term adaptation in laboratory budding yeast populations.

Authors:  Milo S Johnson; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 8.713

4.  Heterogeneity of the GFP fitness landscape and data-driven protein design.

Authors:  Louisa Gonzalez Somermeyer; Aubin Fleiss; Alexander S Mishin; Nina G Bozhanova; Anna A Igolkina; Jens Meiler; Maria-Elisenda Alaball Pujol; Ekaterina V Putintseva; Karen S Sarkisyan; Fyodor A Kondrashov
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 8.713

5.  Population genetics of polymorphism and divergence in rapidly evolving populations.

Authors:  Matthew J Melissa; Benjamin H Good; Daniel S Fisher; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Overdominant and partially dominant mutations drive clonal adaptation in diploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Dimitra Aggeli; Daniel A Marad; Xianan Liu; Sean W Buskirk; Sasha F Levy; Gregory I Lang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Emergence and propagation of epistasis in metabolic networks.

Authors:  Sergey Kryazhimskiy
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Phenotypic and molecular evolution across 10,000 generations in laboratory budding yeast populations.

Authors:  Milo S Johnson; Shreyas Gopalakrishnan; Juhee Goyal; Megan E Dillingham; Christopher W Bakerlee; Parris T Humphrey; Tanush Jagdish; Elizabeth R Jerison; Katya Kosheleva; Katherine R Lawrence; Jiseon Min; Alief Moulana; Angela M Phillips; Julia C Piper; Ramya Purkanti; Artur Rego-Costa; Michael J McDonald; Alex N Nguyen Ba; Michael M Desai
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Selection Maintains Protein Interactome Resilience in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Rohan Maddamsetti
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Historical Contingency Causes Divergence in Adaptive Expression of the lac Operon.

Authors:  Kedar Karkare; Huei-Yi Lai; Ricardo B R Azevedo; Tim F Cooper
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.