Literature DB >> 31648631

Corticospinal Tract Injury Estimated From Acute Stroke Imaging Predicts Upper Extremity Motor Recovery After Stroke.

David J Lin1,2, Alison M Cloutier1, Kimberly S Erler3, Jessica M Cassidy4, Samuel B Snider2, Jessica Ranford5, Kristin Parlman6, Fabio Giatsidis1,7, James F Burke8, Lee H Schwamm9, Seth P Finklestein9, Leigh R Hochberg1,2,10,11, Steven C Cramer12.   

Abstract

Background and Purpose- Injury to the corticospinal tract (CST) has been shown to have a major effect on upper extremity motor recovery after stroke. This study aimed to examine how well CST injury, measured from neuroimaging acquired during the acute stroke workup, predicts upper extremity motor recovery. Methods- Patients with upper extremity weakness after ischemic stroke were assessed using the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer during the acute stroke hospitalization and again at 3-month follow-up. CST injury was quantified and compared, using 4 different methods, from images obtained as part of the stroke standard-of-care workup. Logistic and linear regression were performed using CST injury to predict ΔFugl-Meyer. Injury to primary motor and premotor cortices were included as potential modifiers of the effect of CST injury on recovery. Results- N=48 patients were enrolled 4.2±2.7 days poststroke and completed 3-month follow-up (median 90-day modified Rankin Scale score, 3; interquartile range, 1.5). CST injury distinguished patients who reached their recovery potential (as predicted from initial impairment) from those who did not, with area under the curve values ranging from 0.70 to 0.8. In addition, CST injury explained ≈20% of the variance in the magnitude of upper extremity recovery, even after controlling for the severity of initial impairment. Results were consistent when comparing 4 different methods of measuring CST injury. Extent of injury to primary motor and premotor cortices did not significantly influence the predictive value that CST injury had for recovery. Conclusions- Structural injury to the CST, as estimated from standard-of-care imaging available during the acute stroke hospitalization, is a robust way to distinguish patients who achieve their predicted recovery potential and explains a significant amount of the variance in poststroke upper extremity motor recovery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  area under curve; humans; neuroimaging; neurological rehabilitation; pyramidal tracts

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31648631      PMCID: PMC6878199          DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  40 in total

Review 1.  Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment.

Authors:  Jayawant N Mandrekar
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 15.609

2.  Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke.

Authors:  Gert Kwakkel; Boudewijn Kollen; Jos Twisk
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Proportional Motor Recovery After Stroke: Implications for Trial Design.

Authors:  Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow; Suzanne J Ackerley; Marie-Claire Smith; Victor M Borges; P Alan Barber
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 4.  Biomarkers of Stroke Recovery: Consensus-Based Core Recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable.

Authors:  Lara A Boyd; Kathryn S Hayward; Nick S Ward; Cathy M Stinear; Charlotte Rosso; Rebecca J Fisher; Alexandre R Carter; Alex P Leff; David A Copland; Leeanne M Carey; Leonardo G Cohen; D Michele Basso; Jane M Maguire; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2017 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Role of the premotor cortex in recovery from middle cerebral artery infarction.

Authors:  R J Seitz; P Höflich; F Binkofski; L Tellmann; H Herzog; H J Freund
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1998-08

6.  A standardized approach to the Fugl-Meyer assessment and its implications for clinical trials.

Authors:  Jill See; Lucy Dodakian; Cathy Chou; Vicky Chan; Alison McKenzie; David J Reinkensmeyer; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  Predicting Recovery Potential for Individual Stroke Patients Increases Rehabilitation Efficiency.

Authors:  Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow; Suzanne J Ackerley; P Alan Barber; Marie-Claire Smith
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Shyam Prabhakaran; Eric Zarahn; Claire Riley; Allison Speizer; Ji Y Chong; Ronald M Lazar; Randolph S Marshall; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 3.919

9.  Brain regions important for recovery after severe post-stroke upper limb paresis.

Authors:  Jane M Rondina; Chang-Hyun Park; Nick S Ward
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Does Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Have an Added Value to Clinical Assessment in Predicting Upper-Limb Function Very Early After Severe Stroke?

Authors:  Maurits H J Hoonhorst; Rinske H M Nijland; Peter J S van den Berg; Cornelis H Emmelot; Boudewijn J Kollen; Gert Kwakkel
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 3.919

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Central nervous system physiology.

Authors:  John Rothwell; Andrea Antal; David Burke; Antony Carlsen; Dejan Georgiev; Marjan Jahanshahi; Dagmar Sternad; Josep Valls-Solé; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Accurate Prediction of Persistent Upper Extremity Impairment in Patients With Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Adam de Havenon; Laura Heitsch; Abimbola Sunmonu; Robynne Braun; Keith R Lohse; John W Cole; Eva Mistry; Arne Lindgren; Bradford B Worrall; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 3.  Modulation of neural co-firing to enhance network transmission and improve motor function after stroke.

Authors:  Karunesh Ganguly; Preeya Khanna; Robert J Morecraft; David J Lin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 18.688

4.  The predictive value of lesion and disconnectome loads for upper limb motor impairment after stroke.

Authors:  Chang-Hyun Park; Suk Hoon Ohn
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.830

5.  Basal Ganglia versus Peripheral Infarcts: Predictive Value of Early Fiber Alterations.

Authors:  M T Berndt; D Pürner; C Maegerlein; S Wunderlich; B Friedrich; C Zimmer; D Sepp; J Kaesmacher; T Boeckh-Behrens
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Axonal remodeling of the corticospinal tract during neurological recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Zhongwu Liu; Hongqi Xin; Michael Chopp
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 5.135

7.  Cognitive Demands Influence Upper Extremity Motor Performance During Recovery From Acute Stroke.

Authors:  David J Lin; Kimberly S Erler; Samuel B Snider; Anna K Bonkhoff; Julie A DiCarlo; Nicole Lam; Jessica Ranford; Kristin Parlman; Audrey Cohen; Jennifer Freeburn; Seth P Finklestein; Lee H Schwamm; Leigh R Hochberg; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 11.800

8.  Does Measurement of Corticospinal Tract Involvement Add Value to Clinical Behavioral Biomarkers in Predicting Motor Recovery after Stroke?

Authors:  Jong Youb Lim; Mi-Kyoung Oh; Jihong Park; Nam-Jong Paik
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 9.  The Utility of Domain-Specific End Points in Acute Stroke Trials.

Authors:  Steven C Cramer; Steven L Wolf; Jeffrey L Saver; Karen C Johnston; J Mocco; Maarten G Lansberg; Sean I Savitz; David S Liebeskind; Wade Smith; Max Wintermark; Jordan J Elm; Pooja Khatri; Joseph P Broderick; Scott Janis
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Predicting the Outcome of Large-Vessel Ischemic Stroke Treated with Mechanical Thrombectomy: Is This the Prime Time?

Authors:  Y Hannawi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.