Literature DB >> 28143920

Proportional Motor Recovery After Stroke: Implications for Trial Design.

Cathy M Stinear1, Winston D Byblow2, Suzanne J Ackerley2, Marie-Claire Smith2, Victor M Borges2, P Alan Barber2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Recovery of upper-limb motor impairment after first-ever ischemic stroke is proportional to the degree of initial impairment in patients with a functional corticospinal tract (CST). This study aimed to investigate whether proportional recovery occurs in a more clinically relevant sample including patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and previous stroke.
METHODS: Patients with upper-limb weakness were assessed 3 days and 3 months poststroke with the Fugl-Meyer scale. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to test CST function, and patients were dichotomized according to the presence of motor evoked potentials in the paretic wrist extensors. Linear regression modeling of Δ Fugl-Meyer score between 3 days and 3 months was performed, with predictors including initial impairment (66 - baseline Fugl-Meyer score), age, sex, stroke type, previous stroke, comorbidities, and upper-limb therapy dose.
RESULTS: One hundred ninety-two patients were recruited, and 157 completed 3-month follow-up. Patients with a functional CST made a proportional recovery of 63% (95% confidence interval, 55%-70%) of initial motor impairment. The recovery of patients without a functional CST was not proportional to initial impairment and was reduced by greater CST damage.
CONCLUSIONS: Recovery of motor impairment in patients with intact CST is proportional to initial impairment and unaffected by previous stroke, type of stroke, or upper-limb therapy dose. Novel interventions that interact with the neurobiological mechanisms of recovery are needed. The generalizability of proportional recovery is such that patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and previous stroke may usefully be included in interventional rehabilitation trials. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.anzctr.org.au. Unique identifier: ANZCTR12611000755932.
© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  impairment; magnetic resonance imaging; rehabilitation; stroke; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28143920     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  36 in total

1.  Differential Poststroke Motor Recovery in an Arm Versus Hand Muscle in the Absence of Motor Evoked Potentials.

Authors:  Heidi M Schambra; Jing Xu; Meret Branscheidt; Martin Lindquist; Jasim Uddin; Levke Steiner; Benjamin Hertler; Nathan Kim; Jessica Berard; Michelle D Harran; Juan C Cortes; Tomoko Kitago; Andreas Luft; John W Krakauer; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Age is negatively associated with upper limb recovery after conventional but not robotic rehabilitation in patients with stroke: a secondary analysis of a randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Francesca Cecchi; Marco Germanotta; Claudio Macchi; Angelo Montesano; Silvia Galeri; Manuela Diverio; Catiuscia Falsini; Monica Martini; Rita Mosca; Emanuele Langone; Dionysia Papadopoulou; Maria Chiara Carrozza; Irene Aprile
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Corticospinal Tract Injury Estimated From Acute Stroke Imaging Predicts Upper Extremity Motor Recovery After Stroke.

Authors:  David J Lin; Alison M Cloutier; Kimberly S Erler; Jessica M Cassidy; Samuel B Snider; Jessica Ranford; Kristin Parlman; Fabio Giatsidis; James F Burke; Lee H Schwamm; Seth P Finklestein; Leigh R Hochberg; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 4.  Optimizing functional outcome endpoints for stroke recovery studies.

Authors:  Mustafa Balkaya; Sunghee Cho
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  [Integrated neurorehabilitation improves efficacy of treatment].

Authors:  Stefan Knecht; Bettina Studer
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 6.  Pharmacological Enhancement of Stroke Recovery.

Authors:  Amit Kumar; Tomoko Kitago
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 5.081

7.  Breaking Proportional Recovery After Stroke.

Authors:  Merav R Senesh; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 8.  Cell Therapy in Stroke-Cautious Steps Towards a Clinical Treatment.

Authors:  Olivier Detante; Keith Muir; Jukka Jolkkonen
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 6.829

9.  Basal Ganglia versus Peripheral Infarcts: Predictive Value of Early Fiber Alterations.

Authors:  M T Berndt; D Pürner; C Maegerlein; S Wunderlich; B Friedrich; C Zimmer; D Sepp; J Kaesmacher; T Boeckh-Behrens
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 10.  Beyond Diffusion Tensor MRI Methods for Improved Characterization of the Brain after Ischemic Stroke: A Review.

Authors:  E V R DiBella; A Sharma; L Richards; V Prabhakaran; J J Majersik; S K HashemizadehKolowri
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.