Amy M Cohn1, Ollie Ganz2, Ashley A Dennhardt3, James G Murphy3, Sarah Ehlke4, Sarah Cha5, Amanda L Graham6. 1. University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma Tobacco Research Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States of America. Electronic address: amy-cohn@ouhsc.edu. 2. Department of Prevention and Community Health, George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, DC, United States of America. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States of America. 4. Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, United States of America. 5. Innovations, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, United States of America. 6. Innovations, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC, United States of America; Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Abstract
AIMS: The cooling and minty flavor of menthol in cigarettes has been hypothesized to mask the harshness of inhaled cigarette smoke, contributing to menthol's appeal and subjective reinforcement and linking menthol use to smoking initiation, progression, nicotine dependence, and difficulty quitting. This study examined differences between menthol and non-menthol smokers on behavioral economic indices of reinforcing efficacy (i.e., demand) and subjective response to smoking (i.e., satisfaction, reward, "throat hit," aversion) and the association between measurements of reinforcement and subjective response. DESIGN: 600 current adult smokers were recruited from an online smoking cessation program. Following website enrollment, individuals completed a self-report measurement of subjective response to smoking (reward, satisfaction, aversion, "throat hit"), and a modified cigarette purchase task (CPT) to assess behavioral economic cigarette demand. FINDINGS: In bivariate and adjusted ANOVA models, menthol smokers reported greater subjective reward, satisfaction, and positive sensations in the throat ("throat hit") from smoking compared to non-menthol smokers; and those outcomes were also correlated with greater nicotine dependence and lower likelihood of a past-year quit attempt. Although cigarette demand was associated with smoking level, subjective smoking reward, and nicotine dependence, there were no differences in smoking demand between menthol vs. non-menthol smokers. CONCLUSIONS: The pleasurable aspects of menthol vs non-menthol smoking may be a mechanism linking it to greater nicotine dependence and difficulty quitting. A menthol ban could decrease population-level cigarette consumption by restricting smokers' access to a highly rewarding cigarette flavoring.
AIMS: The cooling and minty flavor of menthol in cigarettes has been hypothesized to mask the harshness of inhaled cigarette smoke, contributing to menthol's appeal and subjective reinforcement and linking menthol use to smoking initiation, progression, nicotine dependence, and difficulty quitting. This study examined differences between menthol and non-menthol smokers on behavioral economic indices of reinforcing efficacy (i.e., demand) and subjective response to smoking (i.e., satisfaction, reward, "throat hit," aversion) and the association between measurements of reinforcement and subjective response. DESIGN: 600 current adult smokers were recruited from an online smoking cessation program. Following website enrollment, individuals completed a self-report measurement of subjective response to smoking (reward, satisfaction, aversion, "throat hit"), and a modified cigarette purchase task (CPT) to assess behavioral economic cigarette demand. FINDINGS: In bivariate and adjusted ANOVA models, menthol smokers reported greater subjective reward, satisfaction, and positive sensations in the throat ("throat hit") from smoking compared to non-menthol smokers; and those outcomes were also correlated with greater nicotine dependence and lower likelihood of a past-year quit attempt. Although cigarette demand was associated with smoking level, subjective smoking reward, and nicotine dependence, there were no differences in smoking demand between menthol vs. non-menthol smokers. CONCLUSIONS: The pleasurable aspects of menthol vs non-menthol smoking may be a mechanism linking it to greater nicotine dependence and difficulty quitting. A menthol ban could decrease population-level cigarette consumption by restricting smokers' access to a highly rewarding cigarette flavoring.
Authors: Ollie Ganz; Amy M Cohn; Renee D Goodwin; Daniel P Giovenco; Olivia A Wackowski; Eugene M Talbot; Cristine D Delnevo Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2021-10-26 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Erin L Mead-Morse; Rachel N Cassidy; Cheryl Oncken; Jennifer W Tidey; Cristine D Delnevo; Mark Litt Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 4.591
Authors: Emilia Krakowiak; Katarzyna Sygit; Marian Sygit; Elżbieta Cipora; Jan Krakowiak Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-05-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jarosław Pinkas; Dorota Kaleta; Wojciech Stefan Zgliczyński; Aleksandra Lusawa; Iwona Wrześniewska-Wal; Waldemar Wierzba; Mariusz Gujski; Mateusz Jankowski Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-30 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Natalie L Johnson; Theresa Patten; Minghong Ma; Mariella De Biasi; Daniel W Wesson Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2022-07-19 Impact factor: 5.152
Authors: Julia C Chen-Sankey; Judy van de Venne; Susan Westneat; Basmah Rahman; Shanell Folger; Andrew Anesetti-Rothermel; Charles Debnam; Kurt M Ribisl; Amy Cohn; Shyanika W Rose Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2022-06-29