Literature DB >> 34405884

Affirming the Abuse Liability and Addiction Potential of Menthol: Differences in Subjective Appeal to Smoking Menthol Versus Non-Menthol Cigarettes Across African American and White Young Adult Smokers.

Amy M Cohn1,2, Adam C Alexander1,3, Sarah J Ehlke1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Menthol cigarettes are popular among young adults and are disproportionately used by African American smokers. Menthol's minty and cooling sensations have been hypothesized to enhance the appeal and reinforcement of smoking; however, differences in menthol's subjective appeal across races have been inconsistent. This secondary data analysis examined differences in subjective appeal for smoking menthol versus non-menthol cigarettes between African American and White young adult smokers.
METHODS: Young adults (ages 18-24) recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk (December 2018-January 2019) completed an online survey of tobacco use behavior. Past year smokers (n = 1726) answered questions about subjective responses to smoking (reward, satisfaction, throat hit, craving reduction, and aversion).
RESULTS: Significantly more African American (73.2%) compared to White (52.4%) smokers preferred menthol cigarettes (p < .001). Menthol smokers reported greater positive and negative subjective responses to smoking than non-menthol smokers. Positive and negative subjective response were both associated with greater smoking intensity and lower cigarette harm perceptions. Interactions of menthol preference and race on indices of subjective appeal also emerged. African American non-menthol smokers reported lower levels of satisfaction, reward, and craving reduction compared to White non-menthol smokers.
CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between menthol preference and subjective response to smoking differs by race. Menthol is rated as more appealing than non-menthol smoking, and appeal indices were linked to smoking intensity and lower harm perceptions, indicating greater abuse liability of menthol cigarettes. Policies that ban menthol cigarettes may have a particularly positive impact on the cigarette smoking of African American young adult smokers. IMPLICATIONS: The FDA issued an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rule Making to examine the role menthol in tobacco products to inform regulations to restrict or ban flavors. This study showed that menthol smokers reported greater appeal to smoking than non-menthol smokers; and an interaction of race x menthol preference showed African American non-menthol smokers reported the lowest levels of appeal to smoking. Multiple indices of cigarette appeal were positively correlated with smoking intensity and lower cigarette harm perceptions, highlighting the addiction potential of menthol cigarettes. Findings suggest a menthol cigarette ban could help reduce tobacco use among young adults.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved.For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34405884      PMCID: PMC8666118          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntab137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   5.825


  37 in total

1.  Confirmatory factor analyses and reliability of the modified cigarette evaluation questionnaire.

Authors:  Joseph C Cappelleri; Andrew G Bushmakin; Christine L Baker; Elizabeth Merikle; Abayomi O Olufade; David G Gilbert
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  Nicotine dependence and quitting behaviors among menthol and non-menthol smokers with similar consumptive patterns.

Authors:  Pebbles Fagan; Eric T Moolchan; Alton Hart; Allison Rose; Deirdre Lawrence; Vickie L Shavers; James Todd Gibson
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  "Because There's Just Something About That Menthol": Exploring African American Smokers' Perspectives on Menthol Smoking and Local Menthol Sales Restrictions.

Authors:  Joanne D'Silva; Erin O'Gara; Craig S Fryer; Raymond G Boyle
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 4.  Diverse tastes: Genetics of sweet and bitter perception.

Authors:  Danielle R Reed; Toshiko Tanaka; Amanda H McDaniel
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-06-19

5.  In Their Own Words: Young Adults' Menthol Cigarette Initiation, Perceptions, Experiences and Regulation Perspectives.

Authors:  Olivia A Wackowski; Kiameesha R Evans; Melissa B Harrell; Alexandra Loukas; M Jane Lewis; Cristine D Delnevo; Cheryl L Perry
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 6.  Why We Must Continue to Investigate Menthol's Role in the African American Smoking Paradox.

Authors:  Linda A Alexander; Dennis R Trinidad; Kari-Lyn K Sakuma; Pallav Pokhrel; Thaddeus A Herzog; Mark S Clanton; Eric T Moolchan; Pebbles Fagan
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  The effect of menthol on cigarette smoking behaviors, biomarkers and subjective responses.

Authors:  Andrew A Strasser; Rebecca L Ashare; Madeline Kaufman; Kathy Z Tang; A Clementina Mesaros; Ian A Blair
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Racial and ethnic differences in serum cotinine levels of cigarette smokers: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1991.

Authors:  R S Caraballo; G A Giovino; T F Pechacek; P D Mowery; P A Richter; W J Strauss; D J Sharp; M P Eriksen; J L Pirkle; K R Maurer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-07-08       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The African Americanization of menthol cigarette use in the United States.

Authors:  Phillip S Gardiner
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 10.  Marketing of menthol cigarettes and consumer perceptions: a review of tobacco industry documents.

Authors:  Stacey J Anderson
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 6.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.