Erin L Mead-Morse1, Rachel N Cassidy2, Cheryl Oncken3, Jennifer W Tidey2, Cristine D Delnevo4, Mark Litt5. 1. Department of Medicine, UConn Health, 263 Farmington Ave., Farmington, CT 06030, USA. Electronic address: mead@uchc.edu. 2. Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Box G-S121-4, Providence, RI 02912, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, UConn Health, 263 Farmington Ave., Farmington, CT 06030, USA. 4. Rutgers Center for Tobacco Studies, 303 George St., New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA. 5. Division of Behavioral Science and Community Health, UConn Health, 263 Farmington Ave., Farmington, CT 06030, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Hypothetical purchase tasks have been widely used to assess the reinforcing value of tobacco products. However, a task has not yet been validated for little cigars and cigarillos (LCCs), a popular tobacco product class among vulnerable populations. This study sought to validate the LCC Purchase Task (LCCPT) in a sample of experienced LCC smokers. METHODS: Data were collected from 65 young adult (18-34 years) LCC and cigarette dual users (78.5% male) in Connecticut (2018-2020). Participants completed the usual-brand LCCPT for consumption in 24 h at increasing prices. We calculated four observed demand indices: intensity (consumption at $0), breakpoint (price after which consumption reaches 0), Omax (maximum daily expenditure), and Pmax (price at which daily expenditure was maximized). Two indices were estimated from demand curves: Q0 (predicted consumption as price approaches $0) and price-sensitivity (sensitivity to price increases). Spearman correlations and multivariable regressions examined the associations between demand indices, self-reported cigar use, and dependence. RESULTS: Correlations were in expected directions. All indices except breakpoint and Pmax were positively correlated with use, and all indices were correlated with multiple measures of dependence. Overall, greater demand and expenditure for LCCs and lower sensitivity to price changes were correlated with greater use and dependence. In regression analyses intensity and price-sensitivity showed the strongest relationships with use and dependence. CONCLUSIONS: The validity of the LCCPT was supported in a sample of experienced LCC smokers. This instrument can be incorporated into other protocols to assess the abuse liability of LCCs.
INTRODUCTION: Hypothetical purchase tasks have been widely used to assess the reinforcing value of tobacco products. However, a task has not yet been validated for little cigars and cigarillos (LCCs), a popular tobacco product class among vulnerable populations. This study sought to validate the LCC Purchase Task (LCCPT) in a sample of experienced LCC smokers. METHODS: Data were collected from 65 young adult (18-34 years) LCC and cigarette dual users (78.5% male) in Connecticut (2018-2020). Participants completed the usual-brand LCCPT for consumption in 24 h at increasing prices. We calculated four observed demand indices: intensity (consumption at $0), breakpoint (price after which consumption reaches 0), Omax (maximum daily expenditure), and Pmax (price at which daily expenditure was maximized). Two indices were estimated from demand curves: Q0 (predicted consumption as price approaches $0) and price-sensitivity (sensitivity to price increases). Spearman correlations and multivariable regressions examined the associations between demand indices, self-reported cigar use, and dependence. RESULTS: Correlations were in expected directions. All indices except breakpoint and Pmax were positively correlated with use, and all indices were correlated with multiple measures of dependence. Overall, greater demand and expenditure for LCCs and lower sensitivity to price changes were correlated with greater use and dependence. In regression analyses intensity and price-sensitivity showed the strongest relationships with use and dependence. CONCLUSIONS: The validity of the LCCPT was supported in a sample of experienced LCC smokers. This instrument can be incorporated into other protocols to assess the abuse liability of LCCs.
Authors: L Cinnamon Bidwell; James MacKillop; James G Murphy; Jennifer W Tidey; Suzanne M Colby Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2012-06-13 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Cindy M Chang; Selvin H Edwards; Aarthi Arab; Arseima Y Del Valle-Pinero; Ling Yang; Dorothy K Hatsukami Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Stephen T Higgins; Sarah H Heil; Stacey C Sigmon; Jennifer W Tidey; Diann E Gaalema; John R Hughes; Maxine L Stitzer; Hanna Durand; Janice Y Bunn; Jeff S Priest; Christopher A Arger; Mollie E Miller; Cecilia L Bergeria; Danielle R Davis; Joanna M Streck; Derek D Reed; Joan M Skelly; Lauren Tursi Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Ivori Zvorsky; Tyler D Nighbor; Allison N Kurti; Michael DeSarno; Gideon Naudé; Derek D Reed; Stephen T Higgins Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Andrew Hyland; Bridget K Ambrose; Kevin P Conway; Nicolette Borek; Elizabeth Lambert; Charles Carusi; Kristie Taylor; Scott Crosse; Geoffrey T Fong; K Michael Cummings; David Abrams; John P Pierce; James Sargent; Karen Messer; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Ray Niaura; Donna Vallone; David Hammond; Nahla Hilmi; Jonathan Kwan; Andrea Piesse; Graham Kalton; Sharon Lohr; Nick Pharris-Ciurej; Victoria Castleman; Victoria R Green; Greta Tessman; Annette Kaufman; Charles Lawrence; Dana M van Bemmel; Heather L Kimmel; Ben Blount; Ling Yang; Barbara O'Brien; Cindy Tworek; Derek Alberding; Lynn C Hull; Yu-Ching Cheng; David Maklan; Cathy L Backinger; Wilson M Compton Journal: Tob Control Date: 2016-08-08 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: James Mackillop; James G Murphy; Jennifer W Tidey; Christopher W Kahler; Lara A Ray; Warren K Bickel Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2008-10-17 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Derek D Reed; Gideon P Naudé; Allyson R Salzer; Michael Peper; Amalia L Monroe-Gulick; Brett W Gelino; Joshua D Harsin; Rachel N S Foster; Tyler D Nighbor; Brent A Kaplan; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Stephen T Higgins Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2020-01-20 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Catherine G Corey; Enver Holder-Hayes; Anh B Nguyen; Cristine D Delnevo; Brian L Rostron; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Heather L Kimmel; Amber Koblitz; Elizabeth Lambert; Jennifer L Pearson; Eva Sharma; Cindy Tworek; Andrew J Hyland; Kevin P Conway; Bridget K Ambrose; Nicolette Borek Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Denise M Dickinson; Sarah E Johnson; Blair N Coleman; Cindy Tworek; Greta K Tessman; Jennifer Alexander Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2016-01-29 Impact factor: 4.244