Literature DB >> 31645786

This is Not Your Grandfather's Medical School: Novel Tools to Enhance Medical Education.

Ryan Sheehy1.   

Abstract

As new medical students start their journey to become the next generation of physicians, they are in awe of the wealth of knowledge at their fingertips as they begin medical school. Every student brings with them a unique story, and most bring with them a high tolerance for technology. The internet, smart phones, and the personal computer have shrunk the academic world and allowed students access to entire libraries that fit within their pockets. Medical school curricula continues to try to evolve to meet students in their increasingly technology filled world. How are medical schools evolving to integrate technology into their curricula? What follows is a review of the application of different technologies in medical education and a close look at the most efficient uses of technology within medical school curricula. This discussion is followed by perspectives from professors and a student on the use of a variety of different technologies for teaching and learning including podcasts, YouTube, Twitter, and varying online resources. Copyright 2019 by the Missouri State Medical Association.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31645786      PMCID: PMC6797036     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mo Med        ISSN: 0026-6620


  22 in total

1.  Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  T Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-06

2.  Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? A randomised controlled study of a computer-generated three-dimensional anatomical ear model.

Authors:  Daren T Nicholson; Colin Chalk; W Robert J Funnell; Sam J Daniel
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  Twelve tips for using podcasts in medical education.

Authors:  John Sandars
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.650

4.  Teaching cricothyrotomy: a multisensory surgical education approach for final-year medical students.

Authors:  Vincent L Biron; Matthew Harris; George Kurien; Chase Campbell; Pierre Lemelin; Dan Livy; David W J Côté; Khalid Ansari
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.891

5.  Integrating Haptics with Augmented Reality in a Femoral Palpation and Needle Insertion Training Simulation.

Authors:  T R Coles; N W John; Derek A Gould; D G Caldwell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 6.  Applications of virtual environments in medicine.

Authors:  G Riva
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.176

7.  Learning about screening using an online or live lecture: does it matter?

Authors:  Anderson Spickard; Nabil Alrajeh; David Cordray; Joseph Gigante
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Live lecture versus video podcast in undergraduate medical education: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Benjamin E Schreiber; Junaid Fukuta; Fabiana Gordon
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  The role of the lecturer as tutor: doing what effective tutors do in a large lecture class.

Authors:  William B Wood; Kimberly D Tanner
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  A descriptive, cross-sectional study of medical student preferences for vodcast design, format and pedagogical approach.

Authors:  Robin K Pettit; Marjorie Kinney; Lise McCoy
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 2.463

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Impact of Educational Resources and Perceived Preparedness on Medical Education Performance.

Authors:  Justin Bauzon; Amalie Alver; Vishvaas Ravikumar; Adrian Devera; Tatiana Mikhael; Rafae Nauman; Edward Simanton
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2021-05-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.