Henrik C Bäcker1,2, Isabelle Steurer-Dober3, Martin Beck2, Christoph A Agten1, Jens Decking4, Richard F Herzog5, Jeffrey A Geller6, Ujwal Bhure1, Justus E Roos1, Klaus Strobel1. 1. Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland. 2. Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland. 3. Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Zug, Baar, Switzerland. 4. Orthopedic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Sursee, Switzerland. 5. Orthopedic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Wolhusen, Switzerland. 6. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center/ Presbyterian Hospital, New York, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of MRI in comparison to single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT in patients with painful hip arthroplasties. METHODS: A prospective, multi-institutional study was performed. Therefore, 35 consecutive patients (21 female, 14 male, mean age 61.8 ± 13.3 years) with 37-painful hip arthroplasties were included. A hip surgeon noted the most likely diagnosis based on clinical examination and hip radiographs. Then, MRI and SPECT/CT of the painful hips were acquired. MRI and SPECT/CT were assessed for loosening, infection, fracture, tendon pathology and other abnormalities. Final diagnosis and therapy was established by the hip surgeon after integration of MRI and SPECT/CT results. The value of MRI and SPECT/CT for diagnosis was assessed with a 3-point scale (1 = unimportant, 2 = helpful, 3 = essential). RESULTS: Loosening was observed in 13/37 arthroplasties (6 shaft only, 6 cup only, 1 combined). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for loosening of MRI were 86%/88%/60%/100% and of SPECT/CT 93%/97%/90%/100%, respectively. MRI and SPECT/CT diagnosed infection correctly in two of three patients and fractures in two patients, which were missed by X-ray. MRI detected soft tissue abnormalities in 21 patients (6 bursitis, 14 tendon lesions, 1 pseudotumor), of which only 1 tendon abnormality was accurately detected with SPECT/CT. All 5 arthroplasties with polyethylene wear were correctly diagnosed clinically and with both imaging modalities. MRI and SPECT/CT were judged as not helpful in 0/0%, as helpful in 16%/49% and essential in 84%/51%. CONCLUSION: In patients with painful hip arthroplasty SPECT/CT is slightly superior to MR in the assessment of loosening. MRI is far superior in the detection of soft tissue, especially tendon pathologies. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: To our knowledge this is the first prospective, multiinstitutional study which compares MRI with SPECT/CT in painful hip arthroplasties. We found that MRI is far superior in the detection of soft tissue pathologies, whereas SPECT/CT remains slightly superior regarding loosening.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of MRI in comparison to single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT in patients with painful hip arthroplasties. METHODS: A prospective, multi-institutional study was performed. Therefore, 35 consecutive patients (21 female, 14 male, mean age 61.8 ± 13.3 years) with 37-painful hip arthroplasties were included. A hip surgeon noted the most likely diagnosis based on clinical examination and hip radiographs. Then, MRI and SPECT/CT of the painful hips were acquired. MRI and SPECT/CT were assessed for loosening, infection, fracture, tendon pathology and other abnormalities. Final diagnosis and therapy was established by the hip surgeon after integration of MRI and SPECT/CT results. The value of MRI and SPECT/CT for diagnosis was assessed with a 3-point scale (1 = unimportant, 2 = helpful, 3 = essential). RESULTS: Loosening was observed in 13/37 arthroplasties (6 shaft only, 6 cup only, 1 combined). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for loosening of MRI were 86%/88%/60%/100% and of SPECT/CT 93%/97%/90%/100%, respectively. MRI and SPECT/CT diagnosed infection correctly in two of three patients and fractures in two patients, which were missed by X-ray. MRI detected soft tissue abnormalities in 21 patients (6 bursitis, 14 tendon lesions, 1 pseudotumor), of which only 1 tendon abnormality was accurately detected with SPECT/CT. All 5 arthroplasties with polyethylene wear were correctly diagnosed clinically and with both imaging modalities. MRI and SPECT/CT were judged as not helpful in 0/0%, as helpful in 16%/49% and essential in 84%/51%. CONCLUSION: In patients with painful hip arthroplasty SPECT/CT is slightly superior to MR in the assessment of loosening. MRI is far superior in the detection of soft tissue, especially tendon pathologies. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: To our knowledge this is the first prospective, multiinstitutional study which compares MRI with SPECT/CT in painful hip arthroplasties. We found that MRI is far superior in the detection of soft tissue pathologies, whereas SPECT/CT remains slightly superior regarding loosening.
Authors: Tim Van den Wyngaert; Frédéric Paycha; Klaus Strobel; Willm Uwe Kampen; Torsten Kuwert; Wouter van der Bruggen; Gopinath Gnanasegaran Journal: Semin Nucl Med Date: 2018-06-19 Impact factor: 4.446
Authors: Oliver Dobrindt; Holger Amthauer; Alexander Krueger; Juri Ruf; Heiko Wissel; Oliver S Grosser; Max Seidensticker; Christoph H Lohmann Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2015-06-02 Impact factor: 1.930
Authors: José A López-López; Rachel L Humphriss; Andrew D Beswick; Howard H Z Thom; Linda P Hunt; Amanda Burston; Christopher G Fawsitt; William Hollingworth; Julian P T Higgins; Nicky J Welton; Ashley W Blom; Elsa M R Marques Journal: BMJ Date: 2017-11-02
Authors: Ramune Aleksyniene; Victor Iyer; Henrik Christian Bertelsen; Majbritt Frost Nilsson; Vesal Khalid; Henrik Carl Schønheyder; Lone Heimann Larsen; Poul Torben Nielsen; Andreas Kappel; Trine Rolighed Thomsen; Jan Lorenzen; Iben Ørsted; Ole Simonsen; Peter Lüttge Jordal; Sten Rasmussen Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-03-10