Literature DB >> 22801790

[Importance of SPECT/CT for knee and hip joint prostheses].

K Strobel1, I Steurer-Dober, M W Huellner, P Veit-Haibach, B Allgayer.   

Abstract

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE: Complications, such as loosening or infections are common problems after hip or knee arthroplasty. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
METHODS: If conventional X-rays are equivocal bone scintigraphy is the classical second-line imaging modality. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) offers metabolic and morphologic information in one imaging step and is becoming increasingly more available in larger hospitals. PERFORMANCE: The SPECT/CT procedure is a promising method and is increasingly being used in daily routine to evaluate joint arthroplasty. The additional benefit compared with classical conventional bone scintigraphy has to be evaluated in further prospective studies. ACHIEVEMENTS: In our hospital SPECT/CT regularly gives important additional information regarding prosthetic joint complications. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: SPECT/CT is increasingly being used as the second step imaging standard modality if conventional X-rays are equivocal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22801790     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-011-2270-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  29 in total

1.  Quantitative scintigraphic evaluation of total knee arthroplasties: a feasibility study.

Authors:  G M Sacchetti; F Ghisellini; M Brambilla; A De Consoli; P Fornara; E Rizzo; M Rudoni; E Inglese; M Cannas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Prosthetic joint infections: radionuclide state-of-the-art imaging.

Authors:  Filip Gemmel; Hans Van den Wyngaert; Charito Love; M M Welling; Paul Gemmel; Christopher J Palestro
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Asymptomatic total hip prosthesis: natural history determined using Tc-99m MDP bone scans.

Authors:  J A Utz; R J Lull; E G Galvin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Radiography, radionuclide imaging, and arthrography in the evaluation of total hip and knee replacement.

Authors:  M I Gelman; R E Coleman; P M Stevens; B W Davey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Three-phase bone scan pattern in asymptomatic uncemented total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  D Rubello; D Caricasulo; N Borsato; F Chierichetti; P Zanco; G Ferlin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-10

Review 6.  Optimized scintigraphic evaluation of infection and inflammation: role of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging.

Authors:  Tira Bunyaviroch; Atul Aggarwal; M Elizabeth Oates
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.446

7.  Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components.

Authors:  Daniel J Berry; W Scott Harmsen; Miguel E Cabanela; Bernard F Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Prospective serial technetium diphosphonate and indium-111 white blood cell labeled imaging in primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J J Callaghan; D Van Nostrand; S H Dysart; C G Savory; W J Hopkins
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  1996

9.  Significance of a "hot patella" in total knee replacement without primary patellar resurfacing.

Authors:  R Ahmad; G Senthil Kumar; K Katam; D Dunlop; J L Pozo
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R A Berger; L S Crossett; J J Jacobs; H E Rubash
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  SPECT/CT in patients with painful knee arthroplasty-what is the evidence?

Authors:  Michael T Hirschmann; Johann Henckel; Helmut Rasch
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in painful total hip arthroplasty: a comparative multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Henrik C Bäcker; Isabelle Steurer-Dober; Martin Beck; Christoph A Agten; Jens Decking; Richard F Herzog; Jeffrey A Geller; Ujwal Bhure; Justus E Roos; Klaus Strobel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Symptomatic versus asymptomatic knees after bilateral total knee arthroplasty: what is the difference in SPECT/CT?

Authors:  R Awengen; H Rasch; F Amsler; M T Hirschmann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Review of the role of dynamic 18F-NaF PET in diagnosing and distinguishing between septic and aseptic loosening in hip prosthesis.

Authors:  Olu Adesanya; Andrew Sprowson; James Masters; Charles Hutchinson
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Evaluation of patients with painful total hip arthroplasty using combined single photon emission tomography and conventional computerized tomography (SPECT/CT) - a comparison of semi-quantitative versus 3D volumetric quantitative measurements.

Authors:  Emilienne Barthassat; Faik Afifi; Praveen Konala; Helmut Rasch; Michael T Hirschmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 6.  The role of hybrid bone SPECT/CT imaging in the work-up of the limping patient: a symptom-based and joint-oriented review.

Authors:  H K Mohan; K Strobel; W van der Bruggen; G Gnanasegaran; W U Kampen; T Kuwert; T Van den Wyngaert; F Paycha
Journal:  Eur J Hybrid Imaging       Date:  2018-04-23

7.  Accuracy comparison of various quantitative [99mTc]Tc-DPD SPECT/CT reconstruction techniques in patients with symptomatic hip and knee joint prostheses.

Authors:  Damian Wild; Martin Kretzschmar; Martin Braun; Michal Cachovan; Felix Kaul; Federico Caobelli; Markus Bäumer; A Hans Vija; Geert Pagenstert
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.138

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.