| Literature DB >> 31642596 |
Dave L Dixon1, Teresa M Salgado1, James Matthew Luther2, James Brian Byrd3,4.
Abstract
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is considered the best means of diagnosing hypertension. However, it is rarely used and is reimbursed only under narrow conditions. We sought to gain insight into the perceived value of ABPM among stakeholders who responded to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) request for comments to inform the first revision of ABPM reimbursement policy in over 15 years. We found that most comments were classifiable in two main themes, current coverage and future coverage. Individuals and institutions representing multiple disciplines and specialties were highly supportive of expanding the current CMS coverage of ABPM, including for a wide range of clinical indications and populations. It is clear from the comments reviewed that there is wide support for expanding CMS coverage for ABPM. Broad support for a change in ABPM reimbursement policy may lead to changes in the way this technology is used in the United States.Entities:
Keywords: ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; hypertension; policy; reimbursement
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31642596 PMCID: PMC7018518 DOI: 10.1111/jch.13719
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ISSN: 1524-6175 Impact factor: 3.738