Brittany U Carter1, Mary Beth Kaylor. 1. aKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon bCollege of Graduate Health Sciences, A.T. Still University, Mesa, Arizona, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypertension is the most commonly diagnosed medical condition in the USA. Unfortunately, patients are misdiagnosed in primary care because of inaccurate office-based blood pressure measurements. Several US healthcare organizations currently recommend confirming an office-based hypertension diagnosis with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to avoid overtreatment; however, its use for the purpose of confirming an office-based hypertension diagnosis is relatively unknown. METHODS: This descriptive study surveyed 143 primary-care physicians in Oregon with regard to their current use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. RESULTS: Nineteen percent of the physicians reported that they would use ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to confirm an office-based hypertension diagnosis, although over half had never ordered it. The most frequent indication for ordering ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was to investigate suspected white-coat hypertension (37.3%). In addition, many of the practices did not own an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device (79.7%) and, therefore, had to refer patients to other clinics or departments for testing. CONCLUSION: Many primary-care physicians will need to change their current clinical practice to align with the shift toward a confirmation process for office-based hypertension diagnoses to improve population health.
BACKGROUND:Hypertension is the most commonly diagnosed medical condition in the USA. Unfortunately, patients are misdiagnosed in primary care because of inaccurate office-based blood pressure measurements. Several US healthcare organizations currently recommend confirming an office-based hypertension diagnosis with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to avoid overtreatment; however, its use for the purpose of confirming an office-based hypertension diagnosis is relatively unknown. METHODS: This descriptive study surveyed 143 primary-care physicians in Oregon with regard to their current use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. RESULTS: Nineteen percent of the physicians reported that they would use ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to confirm an office-based hypertension diagnosis, although over half had never ordered it. The most frequent indication for ordering ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was to investigate suspected white-coat hypertension (37.3%). In addition, many of the practices did not own an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring device (79.7%) and, therefore, had to refer patients to other clinics or departments for testing. CONCLUSION: Many primary-care physicians will need to change their current clinical practice to align with the shift toward a confirmation process for office-based hypertension diagnoses to improve population health.
Authors: Sonal J Patil; Nuha K Wareg; Kelvin L Hodges; Jamie B Smith; Mark S Kaiser; Michael L LeFevre Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Chia-Fang Chung; Sean A Munson; Matthew J Thompson; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Jeffrey Kaplan; Randall Cline; Beverly B Green Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2016 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Dave L Dixon; Teresa M Salgado; James Matthew Luther; James Brian Byrd Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Enrique Martín Rioboó; Jose Ramón Banegas; Luis Angel Pérula de Torres; Jose María Lobos Bejarano Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2018-04-11 Impact factor: 1.137