Literature DB >> 31642031

Binding to m6A RNA promotes YTHDF2-mediated phase separation.

Jiahua Wang1, Liyong Wang1, Jianbo Diao1, Yujiang Geno Shi2, Yang Shi3,4, Honghui Ma5, Hongjie Shen6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31642031      PMCID: PMC7093369          DOI: 10.1007/s13238-019-00660-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Cell        ISSN: 1674-800X            Impact factor:   14.870


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, As one of the most abundant modifications on mRNA in mammal, N6-methyladenosine (m6A) has been demonstrated to play important roles in various biological processes including nuclear RNA export, mRNA splicing, miRNA processing, mRNA degradation and translation (Shi et al., 2019). Importantly, different m6A reader proteins have been shown to play central roles in these processes. YTH (YT521-B homology)-domain containing proteins are members of the conserved m6A reader family, which recognize m6A via the YTH domain (Hazra et al., 2019). Members of this family have been shown to play a role in mRNA translation and mRNA decay (Wang et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2015; Li et al., 2017; Shi et al.,2017). However, mechanisms by which these readers impact various biological processes are still elusive. For instance, YTHDF2 has been shown to regulate mRNA decay and is localized to the membrane-less cytoplasmic P granules (Wang et al., 2014), where mRNA decay occurs. But how YTHDF2 and its associated m6A RNAs are localized to this phase-separated granule (Standart and Weil, 2018) remains largely unknown. As P bodies are liquid-like droplets in cytoplasm (Standart and Weil, 2018), we speculated that YTHDF2 may share liquid-like phase separation (LLPS) features. As with many LLPS proteins, YTHDF2 contains a low complexity (LC) domain (aa 230–383), which includes a glutamine (Q) rich domain (aa 288–383) (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, recombinant YTHDF2 protein containing the LC domain (YTHDF2aa 230−383) forms liquid droplets (23 μmol/L protein in 37 mmol/L NaCl, 10% PEG8000), which are sensitive to 1,6-hexanediol (previously shown to specifically disrupt liquid-like assemblies) (Kroschwald et al., 2017) (Fig. 1B), suggesting phase separation. This phase separation ability is dependent on NaCl concentration (Fig. S1A), which is consistent with another report (Ries et al., 2019). Moreover, we found these droplets fuse with each other to form bigger droplets, which further suggests a liquid like phase separation feature of YTHDF2aa 230−383 (Fig. S1B, and Video S1). Other members of this family, YTHDF1 and YTHDF3, also contain glutamine (Q) rich domain (Fig. S1C), and also have phase separation ability (Fig. S1D). As YTHDF2 glutamine compositional bias is conserved among vertebrates, to determine whether glutamine richness within the LC domain is important for LLPS of YTHDF2, we changed all glutamine to alanine in YTHDF2aa 230−383 (Fig. S1E), and the mutated protein essentially failed to form as many and large LLPS under the same assay condition (Fig. S1F and S1G). Similarly, another phase separation protein MED1 contains conserved serine (S) rich region, and this serine bias is necessary for MED1 phase separation (Sabari et al., 2018). To test whether YTHDF2 forms LLPS in cell, we overexpressed EGFP-YTHDF2 in mouse embryonic stem (mES) cells and human U2OS cells. FRAP assays showed YTHDF2 forms LLPS in both cell lines (Fig. 1C and 1D).
Figure 1

Phase separation of YTHDF2 in vivo/vitro. (A) Top: Diagram of protein domains of YTHDF2. Bottom: predictions of Intrinsic disorder tendency of YTHDF2 by IUPred2A (https://iupred2a.elte.hu/). Scores above 0.5 indicate disorder. (B) Liquid phase separation of YTHDF2aa 230−383 (23 μmol/L YTHDF2, 37 mmol/L NaCl, 10% PEG8000) was sensitive to 1,6-hexanediol (1,6-hex; 3%). Scale bar, 10 μm. (C and D) EGFP-YTHDF2 was exogenously expressed in mES cells (C) or U2OS cells (D). FRAP assays showed YTHDF2 forms LLPS in both cell lines (Left). The line traces represent mean fractional fluorescence (Right). Scale bar, 5 μm (C), 10 μm (D). (E) m6A oligos induced liquid like droplet formation of YTHDF2aa 230−579 (58 μmol/L YTHDF2, 33 mmol/L NaCl, 17 μmol/L RNA oligos). Scale bar, 10 μm. (F) m6A oligos could not induce liquid like droplet formation of W432A/W486A mutated YTHDF2aa 230−579 (58 μmol/L YTHDF2, 33 mmol/L NaCl, 17 μmol/L RNA oligos). Scale bar, 10 μm. (G) Wildtype, but not W432A/W486A mutated EGFP-YTHDF2 formed droplets in mESCs. Wildtype EGFP-YTHDF2 failed to form droplets in Mettl14 or Mettl3 KO mESCs. Scale bar, 5 μm

Phase separation of YTHDF2 in vivo/vitro. (A) Top: Diagram of protein domains of YTHDF2. Bottom: predictions of Intrinsic disorder tendency of YTHDF2 by IUPred2A (https://iupred2a.elte.hu/). Scores above 0.5 indicate disorder. (B) Liquid phase separation of YTHDF2aa 230−383 (23 μmol/L YTHDF2, 37 mmol/L NaCl, 10% PEG8000) was sensitive to 1,6-hexanediol (1,6-hex; 3%). Scale bar, 10 μm. (C and D) EGFP-YTHDF2 was exogenously expressed in mES cells (C) or U2OS cells (D). FRAP assays showed YTHDF2 forms LLPS in both cell lines (Left). The line traces represent mean fractional fluorescence (Right). Scale bar, 5 μm (C), 10 μm (D). (E) m6A oligos induced liquid like droplet formation of YTHDF2aa 230−579 (58 μmol/L YTHDF2, 33 mmol/L NaCl, 17 μmol/L RNA oligos). Scale bar, 10 μm. (F) m6A oligos could not induce liquid like droplet formation of W432A/W486A mutated YTHDF2aa 230−579 (58 μmol/L YTHDF2, 33 mmol/L NaCl, 17 μmol/L RNA oligos). Scale bar, 10 μm. (G) Wildtype, but not W432A/W486A mutated EGFP-YTHDF2 formed droplets in mESCs. Wildtype EGFP-YTHDF2 failed to form droplets in Mettl14 or Mettl3 KO mESCs. Scale bar, 5 μm Previous studies suggested that RNA plays a crucial role in protein phase separation. For instance, RNA has been shown to facilitate HP1 alpha phase separation on heterochromatin (Strom et al., 2017). Given that YTHDF2 preferentially binds m6A RNA (Wang et al., 2014), we hypothesized that m6A RNA might promote YTHDF2-mediated phase separation. To test this idea, we constructed a portion of the YTHDF2 protein containing aa 230 to its C terminus (aa 579), which includes both the LC and the YTH domains (Fig. 1A). We identified a condition (13 μmol/L YTHDF2, 37 mmol/L NaCl, 0.74 μmol/L RNA, 10% PEG8000) under which the recombinant YTHDF2aa 230−579 protein barely formed LLPS with RNA oligos containing no m6A in vitro (Fig. S1H, right and S1I). Importantly, however, under the same assay condition, RNA oligos containing one m6A modification induced liquid like droplet formation (Fig. S1H, left and S1I). In addition, we found this phase separation enhancement appears to be dependent on the number of m6A in the RNA. As shown in Fig. 1E, phase separation mediated by YTHDF2 increases in a manner that is dependent on the number of m6A sites in the RNA oligos (50 bp RNAs containing either 0, 1, 5, or 10 m6A). These results are consistent with the recent reports that RNA oligos containing multiple m6A methylation sites robustly induce droplet formation by YTHDF2 (Gao et al., 2019; Ries et al., 2019). Consistently, induction of phase separation of YTHDF2 by m6A RNAs seems to be dependent on the YTH domain, as even the RNA containing 10 m6A failed to enhance phase separation in vitro when the m6A-binding capability of the YTH domain is compromised (YTHDF2aa 230−579 carrying W432A, W486A) (Li et al., 2014) (Fig. 1F). To corroborate this finding, we investigated whether binding of YTHDF2 to m6A is necessary for phase separation in vivo by expressing wildtype and the m6A-binding defective YTHDF2 (YTH mutated (W432A, W486A)) in mouse ES cells. While wildtype YTHDF2 formed droplets in cell, YTH mutated YTHDF2 did not (Fig. 1G), indicating that the ability of YTHDF2 to bind m6A RNA is necessary for YTHDF2 LLPS in vivo. To further confirm this finding, we asked whether YTHDF2 forms LLPS in cells lacking the mRNA m6A enzymatic complex, METTL3 or METTL14 (Fig. S1J). We detected no YTHDF2 droplets in these cells (Fig. 1G), further supporting the notion that m6A promotes YTHDF2 LLPS in cells. In summary, we provide both in vitro and in vivo data demonstrating that m6A enhances phase separation of YTHDF2. Although recombinant YTHDF2 itself can phase separate in vitro, m6A modification significantly enhances this ability, and in vivo, YTHDF2 LLPS may in fact be dependent on binding m6A mRNAs. While this manuscript was in preparation, several groups reported that YTHDF family proteins display phase separation potential (Fu and Zhuang, 2019; Gao et al., 2019; Ries et al., 2019) stimulated by m6A RNA (Gao et al., 2019; Ries et al., 2019), consistent with our finding that m6A promotes the phase separation potential of YTHDF2. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 22 kb) Supplementary material 2 (MP4 3014 kb) Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 47 kb) Supplementary material 4 (PPTX 2065 kb)
  12 in total

1.  Phase separation drives heterochromatin domain formation.

Authors:  Amy R Strom; Alexander V Emelyanov; Mustafa Mir; Dmitry V Fyodorov; Xavier Darzacq; Gary H Karpen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Where, When, and How: Context-Dependent Functions of RNA Methylation Writers, Readers, and Erasers.

Authors:  Hailing Shi; Jiangbo Wei; Chuan He
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  N(6)-methyladenosine Modulates Messenger RNA Translation Efficiency.

Authors:  Xiao Wang; Boxuan Simen Zhao; Ian A Roundtree; Zhike Lu; Dali Han; Honghui Ma; Xiaocheng Weng; Kai Chen; Hailing Shi; Chuan He
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Cytoplasmic m6A reader YTHDF3 promotes mRNA translation.

Authors:  Ang Li; Yu-Sheng Chen; Xiao-Li Ping; Xin Yang; Wen Xiao; Ying Yang; Hui-Ying Sun; Qin Zhu; Poonam Baidya; Xing Wang; Devi Prasad Bhattarai; Yong-Liang Zhao; Bao-Fa Sun; Yun-Gui Yang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 25.617

5.  Multivalent m6A motifs promote phase separation of YTHDF proteins.

Authors:  Yifei Gao; Gaofeng Pei; Dongxue Li; Ru Li; Yanqiu Shao; Qiangfeng Cliff Zhang; Pilong Li
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 25.617

6.  YTHDF3 facilitates translation and decay of N6-methyladenosine-modified RNA.

Authors:  Hailing Shi; Xiao Wang; Zhike Lu; Boxuan S Zhao; Honghui Ma; Phillip J Hsu; Chang Liu; Chuan He
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 25.617

7.  Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control.

Authors:  Benjamin R Sabari; Alessandra Dall'Agnese; Ann Boija; Isaac A Klein; Eliot L Coffey; Krishna Shrinivas; Brian J Abraham; Nancy M Hannett; Alicia V Zamudio; John C Manteiga; Charles H Li; Yang E Guo; Daniel S Day; Jurian Schuijers; Eliza Vasile; Sohail Malik; Denes Hnisz; Tong Ihn Lee; Ibrahim I Cisse; Robert G Roeder; Phillip A Sharp; Arup K Chakraborty; Richard A Young
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  m⁶A mRNA Destiny: Chained to the rhYTHm by the YTH-Containing Proteins.

Authors:  Ditipriya Hazra; Clément Chapat; Marc Graille
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  m6A enhances the phase separation potential of mRNA.

Authors:  Ryan J Ries; Sara Zaccara; Pierre Klein; Anthony Olarerin-George; Sim Namkoong; Brian F Pickering; Deepak P Patil; Hojoong Kwak; Jun Hee Lee; Samie R Jaffrey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 69.504

10.  N6-methyladenosine-dependent regulation of messenger RNA stability.

Authors:  Xiao Wang; Zhike Lu; Adrian Gomez; Gary C Hon; Yanan Yue; Dali Han; Ye Fu; Marc Parisien; Qing Dai; Guifang Jia; Bing Ren; Tao Pan; Chuan He
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Phase separation drives tumor pathogenesis and evolution: all roads lead to Rome.

Authors:  Xiang Gu; Ai Zhuang; Jie Yu; Peiwei Chai; Renbing Jia; Jing Ruan
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 2.  Novel insights into roles of N6-methyladenosine reader YTHDF2 in cancer progression.

Authors:  Rui Liu; Yachun Jia; Guangyao Kong; Aili He
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 4.322

3.  N6-methyladenosine regulates maternal RNA maintenance in oocytes and timely RNA decay during mouse maternal-to-zygotic transition.

Authors:  You Wu; Xiaocui Xu; Meijie Qi; Chuan Chen; Mengying Li; Rushuang Yan; Xiaochen Kou; Yanhong Zhao; Wenqiang Liu; Yanhe Li; Xuelian Liu; Meiling Zhang; Chengqi Yi; Hongbin Liu; Junhong Xiang; Hong Wang; Bin Shen; Yawei Gao; Shaorong Gao
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 28.213

Review 4.  N6-Methyladenosine Regulates Host Responses to Viral Infection.

Authors:  Michael J McFadden; Stacy M Horner
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 5.  RNA and liquid-liquid phase separation.

Authors:  Qi Guo; Xiangmin Shi; Xiangting Wang
Journal:  Noncoding RNA Res       Date:  2021-04-28

6.  m6A-binding YTHDF proteins promote stress granule formation.

Authors:  Ye Fu; Xiaowei Zhuang
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 7.  Regulatory Role of the RNA N6-Methyladenosine Modification in Immunoregulatory Cells and Immune-Related Bone Homeostasis Associated With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Danping Fan; Ya Xia; Cheng Lu; Qinbin Ye; Xiaoyu Xi; Qiong Wang; Zheng Wang; Chengyuan Wang; Cheng Xiao
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-01-21

Review 8.  Linking the YTH domain to cancer: the importance of YTH family proteins in epigenetics.

Authors:  Rongkai Shi; Shilong Ying; Yadan Li; Liyuan Zhu; Xian Wang; Hongchuan Jin
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 8.469

9.  YTHDF1 promotes mRNA degradation via YTHDF1-AGO2 interaction and phase separation.

Authors:  Jiong Li; Ke Chen; Xin Dong; Yating Xu; Qi Sun; Honghong Wang; Zhen Chen; Cong Liu; Rong Liu; Zhe Yang; Xiangfei Mei; Rongyu Zhang; Liuping Chang; Zongwen Tian; Jianjun Chen; Kaiwei Liang; Chunjiang He; Mengcheng Luo
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 10.  Modulation of Phase Separation by RNA: A Glimpse on N6-Methyladenosine Modification.

Authors:  Yingfeng Su; Yasen Maimaitiyiming; Lingfang Wang; Xiaodong Cheng; Chih-Hung Hsu
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.