Literature DB >> 31637037

Methodology and timing of standardization.

Luca Bertolaccini1, Gaetano Rocco2.   

Abstract

In the last decade, uniportal VATS has increasingly been used for major lung resections as it has revolutionised the way thoracic surgeons treat pulmonary lesions. Uniportal VATS has represented an authentic innovation in thoracic surgery because it represents an ideal link between reduced morbidity and enhanced recovery. From the first feasibility studies, Uniportal VATS has been assessed in terms of postoperative morbidity, mortality, and overall oncologic value yielding similar outcomes compared to open thoracotomy or three-port VATS. The Uniportal VATS Interest Group (UVIG) is a working group inside the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) with a particular interest in Uniportal VATS as the preferred approach to intrathoracic conditions amenable to surgical diagnosis and treatment. The first aim of UVIG was to define a consensus statement on the indications and techniques of uniportal VATS. The first consensus paper among international experts in uniportal VATS lobectomy was obtained through a Delphi process through three rounds of voting to enhance its validity. The Delphi process was used to define the procedure and to optimise the indications, perioperative management and training of Uniportal VATS. The main features of this process including the anonymity of participants, the iterative process, and, controlled feedback were reported in the consensus statement. 2019 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delphi technique; Uniportal VATS; lung cancer; methodology

Year:  2019        PMID: 31637037      PMCID: PMC6783712          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.02.35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  7 in total

Review 1.  Consensus methods for medical and health services research.

Authors:  J Jones; D Hunter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-08-05

Review 2.  Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies.

Authors:  Ivan R Diamond; Robert C Grant; Brian M Feldman; Paul B Pencharz; Simon C Ling; Aideen M Moore; Paul W Wales
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Future study direction on single port (uniportal) VATS.

Authors:  Raffaele Rocco; Gaetano Rocco
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  A novel assessment tool for evaluating competence in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy.

Authors:  Katrine Jensen; René Horsleben Petersen; Henrik Jessen Hansen; William Walker; Jesper Holst Pedersen; Lars Konge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Outcomes from the Delphi process of the Thoracic Robotic Curriculum Development Committee.

Authors:  Giulia Veronesi; Patrick Dorn; Joel Dunning; Giuseppe Cardillo; Ralph A Schmid; Justin Collins; Jean-Marc Baste; Stefan Limmer; Ghada M M Shahin; Jan-Hendrik Egberts; Alessandro Pardolesi; Elisa Meacci; Sasha Stamenkovic; Gianluca Casali; Jens C Rueckert; Mauro Taurchini; Nicola Santelmo; Franca Melfi; Alper Toker
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 6.  Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rym Boulkedid; Hendy Abdoul; Marine Loustau; Olivier Sibony; Corinne Alberti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques.

Authors:  Sara S McMillan; Michelle King; Mary P Tully
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-02-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.