Katrine Jensen1,2, René Horsleben Petersen3, Henrik Jessen Hansen3, William Walker4, Jesper Holst Pedersen3, Lars Konge5. 1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery 2152, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. katrine.jensen@rh.regionh.dk. 2. Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES) 5404, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. katrine.jensen@rh.regionh.dk. 3. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery 2152, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. 5. Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES) 5404, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Specific assessment tools can accelerate trainees' learning through structured feedback and ensure that trainees attain the knowledge and skills required to practice as competent, independent surgeons (competency-based surgical education). The objective was to develop an assessment tool for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy by achieving consensus within an international group of VATS experts. METHOD: The Delphi method was used as a structured process for collecting and distilling knowledge from a group of internationally recognized VATS experts. Opinions were obtained in an iterative process involving answering repeated rounds of questionnaires. Responses to one round were summarized and integrated into the next round of questionnaires until consensus was reached. RESULTS: Thirty-one VATS experts were included and four Delphi rounds were conducted. The response rate for each round were 68.9% (31/45), 100% (31/31), 96.8% (30/31), and 93.3% (28/30) for the final round where consensus was reached. The first Delphi round contained 44 items and the final VATS lobectomy Assessment Tool (VATSAT) comprised eight items with rating anchors: (1) localization of tumor and other pathological tissue, (2) dissection of the hilum and veins, (3) dissection of the arteries, (4) dissection of the bronchus, (5) dissection of lymph nodes, (6) retrieval of lobe in bag, (7) respect for tissue and structures, and (8) technical skills in general. CONCLUSION: A novel and dedicated assessment tool for VATS lobectomy was developed based on VATS experts' consensus. The VATSAT can support the learning of VATS lobectomy by providing structured feedback and help supervisors make the important decision of when trainees have acquired VATS lobectomy competencies for independent performance.
BACKGROUND: Specific assessment tools can accelerate trainees' learning through structured feedback and ensure that trainees attain the knowledge and skills required to practice as competent, independent surgeons (competency-based surgical education). The objective was to develop an assessment tool for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy by achieving consensus within an international group of VATS experts. METHOD: The Delphi method was used as a structured process for collecting and distilling knowledge from a group of internationally recognized VATS experts. Opinions were obtained in an iterative process involving answering repeated rounds of questionnaires. Responses to one round were summarized and integrated into the next round of questionnaires until consensus was reached. RESULTS: Thirty-one VATS experts were included and four Delphi rounds were conducted. The response rate for each round were 68.9% (31/45), 100% (31/31), 96.8% (30/31), and 93.3% (28/30) for the final round where consensus was reached. The first Delphi round contained 44 items and the final VATS lobectomy Assessment Tool (VATSAT) comprised eight items with rating anchors: (1) localization of tumor and other pathological tissue, (2) dissection of the hilum and veins, (3) dissection of the arteries, (4) dissection of the bronchus, (5) dissection of lymph nodes, (6) retrieval of lobe in bag, (7) respect for tissue and structures, and (8) technical skills in general. CONCLUSION: A novel and dedicated assessment tool for VATS lobectomy was developed based on VATS experts' consensus. The VATSAT can support the learning of VATS lobectomy by providing structured feedback and help supervisors make the important decision of when trainees have acquired VATS lobectomy competencies for independent performance.
Authors: Gaetano Rocco; Eveline Internullo; Stephen D Cassivi; Dirk Van Raemdonck; Mark K Ferguson Journal: Thorac Surg Clin Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 1.750
Authors: Cornelis J Hopmans; Pieter T den Hoed; Lijckle van der Laan; Erwin van der Harst; Maarten van der Elst; Guido H H Mannaerts; Imro Dawson; Reinier Timman; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Jan N M IJzermans Journal: Surgery Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Shari L Meyerson; Betty C Tong; Stafford S Balderson; Thomas A D'Amico; Joseph D Phillips; Malcolm M DeCamp; Debra A DaRosa Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 4.330