Giulia Veronesi1, Patrick Dorn2, Joel Dunning3, Giuseppe Cardillo4, Ralph A Schmid2, Justin Collins5, Jean-Marc Baste6, Stefan Limmer7, Ghada M M Shahin8, Jan-Hendrik Egberts9, Alessandro Pardolesi10, Elisa Meacci11, Sasha Stamenkovic12, Gianluca Casali13, Jens C Rueckert14, Mauro Taurchini15, Nicola Santelmo16, Franca Melfi17, Alper Toker18. 1. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy. 2. Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 3. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK. 4. Unit of Thoracic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Camillo Forlanini, Lazzaro Spallanzani Hospital, Rome, Italy. 5. Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 6. Department of Thoracic Surgery, CHU Rouen, Rouen, France. 7. Unit of Thoracic Surgery, Medical Campus Lake Constance, Weingarten, Germany. 8. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Isala Heart Center, Zwolle, Netherlands. 9. Department for General-, Visceral-, Thoracic, Transplantation-, and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany. 10. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Maggiore-Teaching Hospital, Bologna, Italy. 11. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. 12. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. 13. Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK. 14. Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, Competence Centre of Thoracic Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 15. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo (FG), Italy. 16. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Les Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. 17. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. 18. Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: As the adoption of robotic procedures becomes more widespread, additional risk related to the learning curve can be expected. This article reports the results of a Delphi process to define procedures to optimize robotic training of thoracic surgeons and to promote safe performance of established robotic interventions as, for example, lung cancer and thymoma surgery. METHODS: In June 2016, a working panel was spontaneously created by members of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) and European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) with a specialist interest in robotic thoracic surgery and/or surgical training. An e-consensus-finding exercise using the Delphi methodology was applied requiring 80% agreement to reach consensus on each question. Repeated iterations of anonymous voting continued over 3 rounds. RESULTS: Agreement was reached on many points: a standardized robotic training curriculum for robotic thoracic surgery should be divided into clearly defined sections as a staged learning pathway; the basic robotic curriculum should include a baseline evaluation, an e-learning module, a simulation-based training (including virtual reality simulation, Dry lab and Wet lab) and a robotic theatre (bedside) observation. Advanced robotic training should include e-learning on index procedures (right upper lobe) with video demonstration, access to video library of robotic procedures, simulation training, modular console training to index procedure, transition to full-procedure training with a proctor and final evaluation of the submitted video to certified independent examiners. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement was reached on a large number of questions to optimize and standardize training and education of thoracic surgeons in robotic activity. The production of the content of the learning material is ongoing.
OBJECTIVES: As the adoption of robotic procedures becomes more widespread, additional risk related to the learning curve can be expected. This article reports the results of a Delphi process to define procedures to optimize robotic training of thoracic surgeons and to promote safe performance of established robotic interventions as, for example, lung cancer and thymoma surgery. METHODS: In June 2016, a working panel was spontaneously created by members of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) and European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) with a specialist interest in robotic thoracic surgery and/or surgical training. An e-consensus-finding exercise using the Delphi methodology was applied requiring 80% agreement to reach consensus on each question. Repeated iterations of anonymous voting continued over 3 rounds. RESULTS: Agreement was reached on many points: a standardized robotic training curriculum for robotic thoracic surgery should be divided into clearly defined sections as a staged learning pathway; the basic robotic curriculum should include a baseline evaluation, an e-learning module, a simulation-based training (including virtual reality simulation, Dry lab and Wet lab) and a robotic theatre (bedside) observation. Advanced robotic training should include e-learning on index procedures (right upper lobe) with video demonstration, access to video library of robotic procedures, simulation training, modular console training to index procedure, transition to full-procedure training with a proctor and final evaluation of the submitted video to certified independent examiners. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement was reached on a large number of questions to optimize and standardize training and education of thoracic surgeons in robotic activity. The production of the content of the learning material is ongoing.
Authors: Peter Hertz; Kim Houlind; Jan Jepsen; Lars Bundgaard; Pernille Jensen; Mikkel Friis; Lars Konge; Flemming Bjerrum Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2021-10-27 Impact factor: 3.453
Authors: Alexander Urbanski; Benjamin Babic; Wolfgang Schröder; Lars Schiffmann; Dolores T Müller; Christiane J Bruns; Hans F Fuchs Journal: Chirurg Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 0.955
Authors: I-Hsuan Alan Chen; Ahmed Ghazi; Ashwin Sridhar; Danail Stoyanov; Mark Slack; John D Kelly; Justin W Collins Journal: World J Urol Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Justin W Collins; Ahmed Ghazi; Danail Stoyanov; Andrew Hung; Mark Coleman; Tom Cecil; Anders Ericsson; Mehran Anvari; Yulun Wang; Yanick Beaulieu; Nadine Haram; Ashwin Sridhar; Jacques Marescaux; Michele Diana; Hani J Marcus; Jeffrey Levy; Prokar Dasgupta; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Martin Martino; Richard Feins; Vipul Patel; Mark Slack; Richard M Satava; John D Kelly Journal: Eur Urol Open Sci Date: 2020-11-06