Literature DB >> 29377988

Outcomes from the Delphi process of the Thoracic Robotic Curriculum Development Committee.

Giulia Veronesi1, Patrick Dorn2, Joel Dunning3, Giuseppe Cardillo4, Ralph A Schmid2, Justin Collins5, Jean-Marc Baste6, Stefan Limmer7, Ghada M M Shahin8, Jan-Hendrik Egberts9, Alessandro Pardolesi10, Elisa Meacci11, Sasha Stamenkovic12, Gianluca Casali13, Jens C Rueckert14, Mauro Taurchini15, Nicola Santelmo16, Franca Melfi17, Alper Toker18.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: As the adoption of robotic procedures becomes more widespread, additional risk related to the learning curve can be expected. This article reports the results of a Delphi process to define procedures to optimize robotic training of thoracic surgeons and to promote safe performance of established robotic interventions as, for example, lung cancer and thymoma surgery.
METHODS: In June 2016, a working panel was spontaneously created by members of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) and European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) with a specialist interest in robotic thoracic surgery and/or surgical training. An e-consensus-finding exercise using the Delphi methodology was applied requiring 80% agreement to reach consensus on each question. Repeated iterations of anonymous voting continued over 3 rounds.
RESULTS: Agreement was reached on many points: a standardized robotic training curriculum for robotic thoracic surgery should be divided into clearly defined sections as a staged learning pathway; the basic robotic curriculum should include a baseline evaluation, an e-learning module, a simulation-based training (including virtual reality simulation, Dry lab and Wet lab) and a robotic theatre (bedside) observation. Advanced robotic training should include e-learning on index procedures (right upper lobe) with video demonstration, access to video library of robotic procedures, simulation training, modular console training to index procedure, transition to full-procedure training with a proctor and final evaluation of the submitted video to certified independent examiners.
CONCLUSIONS: Agreement was reached on a large number of questions to optimize and standardize training and education of thoracic surgeons in robotic activity. The production of the content of the learning material is ongoing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29377988     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  10 in total

Review 1.  Early-Stage NSCLC: Advances in Thoracic Oncology 2018.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Giulia Veronesi; Wentao Fang; Simon Ekman; Kenichi Suda; Joachim G Aerts; Jessica Donington
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 15.609

2.  Methodology and timing of standardization.

Authors:  Luca Bertolaccini; Gaetano Rocco
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Identifying curriculum content for a cross-specialty robotic-assisted surgery training program: a Delphi study.

Authors:  Peter Hertz; Kim Houlind; Jan Jepsen; Lars Bundgaard; Pernille Jensen; Mikkel Friis; Lars Konge; Flemming Bjerrum
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 4.  Robotic lobectomy: how to teach thoracic residents.

Authors:  Ricardo Mingarini Terra; Pedro Henrique Cunha Leite; Alberto Jorge Monteiro Dela Vega
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 3.005

5.  Modular step-up approach to robot-assisted transthoracic esophagectomy-experience of a German high volume center.

Authors:  Hans F Fuchs; Dolores T Müller; Jessica M Leers; Wolfgang Schröder; Christiane J Bruns
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-08-23

6.  [New techniques and training methods for robot-assisted surgery and cost-benefit analysis of Ivor Lewis esophagectomy].

Authors:  Alexander Urbanski; Benjamin Babic; Wolfgang Schröder; Lars Schiffmann; Dolores T Müller; Christiane J Bruns; Hans F Fuchs
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Evolving robotic surgery training and improving patient safety, with the integration of novel technologies.

Authors:  I-Hsuan Alan Chen; Ahmed Ghazi; Ashwin Sridhar; Danail Stoyanov; Mark Slack; John D Kelly; Justin W Collins
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Learning Curve of Robot-Assisted Thymectomy: Single Surgeon's 7-Year Experience.

Authors:  Elisa Meacci; Dania Nachira; Maria Teresa Congedo; Leonardo Petracca-Ciavarella; Maria Letizia Vita; Venanzio Porziella; Marco Chiappetta; Filippo Lococo; Diomira Tabacco; Elizabeth Katherine Anna Triumbari; Stefano Margaritora
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-08

9.  Training in robotic surgery, replicating the airline industry. How far have we come?

Authors:  Justin William Collins; Pawel Wisz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Utilising an Accelerated Delphi Process to Develop Guidance and Protocols for Telepresence Applications in Remote Robotic Surgery Training.

Authors:  Justin W Collins; Ahmed Ghazi; Danail Stoyanov; Andrew Hung; Mark Coleman; Tom Cecil; Anders Ericsson; Mehran Anvari; Yulun Wang; Yanick Beaulieu; Nadine Haram; Ashwin Sridhar; Jacques Marescaux; Michele Diana; Hani J Marcus; Jeffrey Levy; Prokar Dasgupta; Dimitrios Stefanidis; Martin Martino; Richard Feins; Vipul Patel; Mark Slack; Richard M Satava; John D Kelly
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2020-11-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.