Using angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ARXPS), we investigate the topmost nanometers of various binary ionic liquid (IL) mixtures at different temperatures in the liquid state. The mixtures consist of ILs with the same [PF6 ]- anion but two different cations, namely 3-methyl-1-(3,3,4,4,4-pentafluorobutyl)imidazolium hexafluorophosphate, [PFBMIm][PF6 ], and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate, [C4 C1 Im][PF6 ], with 10, 25, 50 and 75 mol % content of [PFBMIm][PF6 ]. We observe a preferential enrichment of the fluorinated chain in the topmost layer, relative to the bulk composition, which is most pronounced for the lowest content of [PFBMIm][PF6 ]. Upon cooling the mixtures stepwise from 95 °C until surface charging effects in XPS indicate solidification, we observe a pronounced increase in surface enrichment of the fluorinated chain with decreasing temperature in the liquid state. In contrast to the mixtures with lower [PFBMIm][PF6 ] contents, cooling the 75 mol % mixture additionally shows an abrupt decrease of the fluorinated chain signal before complete solidification occurs, which is assigned to partial precipitation effects.
Using angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ARXPS), we investigate the topmost nanometers of various binary ionic liquid (IL) mixtures at different temperatures in the liquid state. The mixtures consist of ILs with the same [PF6 ]- anion but two different cations, namely 3-methyl-1-(3,3,4,4,4-pentafluorobutyl)imidazolium hexafluorophosphate, [PFBMIm][PF6 ], and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate, [C4 C1 Im][PF6 ], with 10, 25, 50 and 75 mol % content of [PFBMIm][PF6 ]. We observe a preferential enrichment of the fluorinated chain in the topmost layer, relative to the bulk composition, which is most pronounced for the lowest content of [PFBMIm][PF6 ]. Upon cooling the mixtures stepwise from 95 °C until surface charging effects in XPS indicate solidification, we observe a pronounced increase in surface enrichment of the fluorinated chain with decreasing temperature in the liquid state. In contrast to the mixtures with lower [PFBMIm][PF6 ] contents, cooling the 75 mol % mixture additionally shows an abrupt decrease of the fluorinated chain signal before complete solidification occurs, which is assigned to partial precipitation effects.
Ionic liquids (ILs) carrying fluorinated alkyl chains, in the following called fluorinated ILs, represent an interesting class of ILs because they often exhibit unique properties such as high thermal and chemical stability, and high gas solubility. Moreover, they commonly show low surface tension and/or are chemically and biologically inert.1 Therefore, they are potential candidates to substitute fluorinated organic compounds in different applications, for example, as surfactants, gas absorbents, lubricants and refrigerants.1a, 2 It has also been shown that fluorinated ILs can be used as gas carriers,1a, 1d electrolytes in fuel and solar cells, and in lithium batteries,1b, 2, 3 in catalysis2, 4 and in many more applications.While non‐fluorinated ILs are known to form bulk nanostructures consisting of polar and nonpolar domains, fluorinated ILs typically exhibit additional nonpolar fluorous domains, in which the fluorinated chains preferentially agglomerate.1a–1c, 5 Alkylated and fluorinated chains can be present either in one single IL (e.g. alkyl chains in the cation and fluorinated chains in the anion or vice versa1b), or in IL mixtures with one IL containing alkyl chains and the other one containing fluorinated chains. Changing the relative chain length in one IL or the molar ratio of the two ILs in the mixture influences the related properties and the domain structure.5, 6 It should be emphasized that using IL mixtures allows for fine‐tuning the properties in a very subtle way. Applying IL mixtures instead of using one neat IL becomes even more beneficial in the context of the European chemical registration process REACH: If one could achieve specific properties by employing adequate mixtures of pre‐registered ILs instead of synthesizing a new task‐specific IL, a lengthy and costly registration process could be avoided. The enormous effort to register a new chemical is demonstrated by the fact that among the many ILs synthesized today, as of June 2019 only eight ILs based on the standard 1‐ethyl‐3‐methylimidazolium cation (see Table S1 in the Supporting Information) have been approved by REACH and only about six further imidazolium salts with melting points below 100 °C have been registered.7Many investigations have been carried out in the last decades on IL mixtures and their composition‐dependent physico‐chemical bulk properties such as viscosity, thermal behavior, density and molar volume, conductivity, solvation abilities, influence on chemical reactivity as well as bulk microscopic structure (e.g., see reviews in Ref. 8 and references therein, and Ref. 9). In contrast, much less studies are available on the surface properties of IL mixtures, despite the fact that the composition of the topmost layers can differ considerably from the bulk composition.6, 8b, 10 In many of the aforementioned applications, particularly those involving systems where a thin IL film coats a high surface area support, the surface, that is, the IL/vacuum(gas) interface plays an important role for the overall performance. Therefore, investigations of the topmost layers of IL mixtures are getting more into the focus of research. A variety of studies has been performed, using reactive‐atom scattering with laser‐induced fluorescence detection (RAS‐LIF),6a, 6c neutron scattering,6c small‐angle X‐ray scattering6c and X‐ray reflectivity,11 time of flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOF‐SIMS),12 Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy (RBS),12a, 13 low‐energy ion scattering (LEIS),14 X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)6b, 10a, 15 and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations.1b, 5, 6, 13b, 16Surface studies of ILs with both alkylated and fluorinated chains are quite rare. In case of neat ILs, Luís et al.1b recently measured the surface tension of [CC1Im][C4F9SO3] ([C4F9SO3]=perfluorobutanesulfonate) with alkyl chain lengths n=2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12, and correlated the derived values with MD simulations. The latter revealed that for cations with less than four carbon atoms in the alkyl chain, the outer surface is dominated by the presence of the fluorinated butyl chains of the anion, with the polar head groups preferentially forming a confined sub‐surface layer. Longer alkyl chains (n>4) start to penetrate the fluorinated surface layer pushing the polar head groups of the anion and cation even further away from the outer surface. These findings are in line with the decrease in measured surface tension of the ILs up to n=8, where a maximum number of both fluorinated and alkylated chains (and a minimum number of polar head groups) are present at the outer surface. For even longer alkyl chains (n>8), the surface tension increases again due to the fact that the longer alkyl chains dominate the outer surface, as evidenced by MD simulations.In the case of [C8C1Im]1−[C8C1ImF13][Tf2N] mixtures, RAS‐LIF measurements performed by Smoll et al.6a showed that the fluorinated chain is again preferentially enriched at the surface. By investigating different stoichiometries, they found a large surface excess of the fluorinated chains compared to the nominal bulk composition, particularly at the lowest mole fraction of the fluorinated IL.In this study, we present a detailed angle‐resolved XPS (ARXPS) study under clean ultra‐high vacuum (UHV) conditions on neat [PFBMIm][PF6] and [C4C1Im][PF6] (see Figure 1), and mixtures thereof in four molar ratios (10, 25, 50 and 75 mol %). Both ILs are comprised of the same hexafluorophosphate ([PF6]−) anion and similar imidazolium‐based cations. In [C4C1Im]+, the butyl chain is fully hydrogenated, and in [PFBMIm]+ its terminal ethyl moiety is fluorinated. We analyzed the temperature dependence of the surface composition upon cooling from 95 °C, where all mixtures are in their liquid state, until their solidification. We observe a very pronounced surface enrichment of the fluorinated [PFBMIm]+ chains relative to the bulk composition, which increases with decreasing temperature and decreasing mole fraction of [PFBMIm][PF6].
Figure 1
Molecular structures of a) 1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate, [C4C1Im][PF6], and b) 3‐methyl‐1‐(3,3,4,4,4‐pentafluorobutyl)imidazolium hexafluorophosphate, [PFBMIm][PF6], including the denotation of the carbon atoms, C2, Chetero′, Calkyl and CCFx, in gray.
Molecular structures of a) 1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate, [C4C1Im][PF6], and b) 3‐methyl‐1‐(3,3,4,4,4‐pentafluorobutyl)imidazolium hexafluorophosphate, [PFBMIm][PF6], including the denotation of the carbon atoms, C2, Chetero′, Calkyl and CCFx, in gray.
Experimental Section
Materials: [C4C1Im][PF6] was purchased from Iolitec (purity 99.5 %). The synthesis of [PFBMIm][PF6] has been reported before.17 All neat ILs investigated in this study were used as supplied. To prepare the IL mixtures, acetonitrile (Sigma–Aldrich, purity 99.8 %) was used as a co‐solvent to ensure proper mixing of the ILs. For the ARXPS measurements of the neat ILs and the mixtures, a layer of up to 0.5 mm thickness was prepared on a molybdenum sample holder reservoir. Subsequently, the sample holder was placed into the load‐lock of our vacuum chamber and degassed for at least twelve hours.Angle‐resolved X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ARXPS): The ARXPS experiments were performed in our DASSA (Dual Analyzer System for Surface Analysis) setup, for details see Ref. 18. Simultaneous acquisition of ARXP spectra at two fixed emission angles of ϑ=0° (normal emission) and 80° (grazing emission) with respect to the surface normal of a horizontally mounted sample was achieved by two hemispherical energy analyzers (ARGUS‐type). This reduces the total measurement time and thus the exposure of the sample to X‐rays by a factor of two, which in turn minimizes radiation damage. Furthermore, the spectra at 0° and 80° correspond to the sample under exactly identical conditions. A monochromated X‐ray source with Al Kα radiation (XM 1000, hν=1486.6 eV, 238 W) was used as X‐ray source. Survey scans were recorded with a pass energy of 150 eV and region scans with 35 eV; for the latter, the overall energy resolution is 0.4 eV. The binding energy scale was referenced to the Fermi level of Au.In organic matter, the information depth of photoelectrons after excitation with Al Kα radiation at 0° is 7 to 9 nm (depending on the kinetic energy). At 80°, it decreases to 1.0 to 1.5 nm, making the measurement very surface sensitive: ≈80 % of the signal originates from the topmost molecular layer. Each set of 80° spectra was scaled up by an individual geometry factor to compensate for lower intensity compared to 0° spectra.18 After this normalization, intensity differences between 80° and 0° emission angle directly reflect a higher/lower concentration of the respective species at the surface than in the bulk. This allows us to reveal surface enrichment and molecular orientation effects.For the quantitative analysis of the spectra, we used atomic sensitivity factors (ASFs).18 As the C 1s signal from the CF3 group of the [PFBMIm]+ cation overlaps with the shake‐up of the aromatic system of the cation, the intensity of this peak is set equal to that of the CF2 peak. CasaXPS (version 2.3.16) was used for subtracting the background and for peak fitting (pseudo‐Voigt function with 30 % Lorentzian contribution). In the F 1s, N 1s and P 2p spectra, a two‐point linear background was subtracted, whereas a three‐point linear background was used for the C 1s spectra. The P 2p signal is composed of the spin‐orbit‐split 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 components, which have the same full width at half maximum (FWHM), are separated by 0.9 eV, and have an area ratio of 1:2. The FWHM of the F 1s peaks of the CFx groups (x=2 and 3) and the [PF6]− anions are 1.94±0.1 and 1.47±0.1 eV, respectively. For the C 1s peaks (see Figure 1 for nomenclature), the following constraints were applied: For neat [PFBMIm][PF6] and for the mixtures, Chetero’ is 1.33 times wider than C2 and these two peaks are separated by 1.02 eV; for neat [C4C1Im][PF6], C2 and Chetero’ are separated by 0.9 eV, and the FWHM of the Chetero’ and Calkyl peaks is set to 1.1 and 1.11 times that of C2, respectively.The sample temperature was measured with a type K thermocouple attached to the molybdenum sample reservoir with an accuracy of ±5 °C, and a stability of ±1 °C.19
Results and Discussion
We investigated various mixtures of 3‐methyl‐1‐(3,3,4,4,4‐pentafluorobutyl)imidazolium hexafluorophosphate, [PFBMIm][PF6], and 1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate, [C4C1Im][PF6], (see Figure 1 for structures) by temperature‐dependent ARXPS. The two ILs have different cations but the same anion, [PF6]−. Apart from the neat ILs, the mixtures with molar ratios of 10, 25, 50 and 75 mol % of [PFBMIm][PF6] were studied. In the following, we first present the data for the two neat ILs and the mixtures at 95 °C. At this temperature, all ILs and mixtures are liquid (the glass transition temperature of [C4C1Im][PF6] is −77 °C20 and the melting point of [PFBMIm][PF6] is 66 °C17). We restricted our investigations to 95 °C and below because of a rise in background pressure to above 5×10−9 mbar at higher temperatures. Thereafter, we discuss their temperature‐dependent behavior. In all figures, the spectra in black correspond to an emission angle of 0°, and the red spectra to 80°.
Neat [C4C1Im][PF6]
In Figure 2 a, the 0° emission XP spectra of [C4C1Im][PF6] are depicted, for a temperature of 95 °C. The F 1s spectrum (left panel) shows the FPF6 peak of the [PF6]− anion at 686.6 eV. The single peak in the N 1s region (center panel) at 402.0 eV is assigned to the imidazoliumnitrogen atoms, NIm. In the C 1s spectrum (right panel), the Calkyl peak at lowest binding energy of ≈285 eV stems from the three alkyl carbon atoms only bound to hydrogen and carbon atoms, and the peak at higher binding energy consists of two contributions: The smaller C2 peak at 287.5 eV is due to the carbon atom bound to two nitrogen atoms, and the Chetero’ peak at 286.6 eV due to carbon atoms bound to one nitrogen atom. In the P 2p region (see Figure S1a in the Supporting Information), the unresolved spin‐orbit peaks of the phosphorus atom of the [PF6]− anion are centered at 136.9 eV. Notably, no signals of possible surface‐active contaminations21 from the synthesis are observed in the O 1s and Si 2p region (see Figure S1a in the Supporting Information), confirming the purity of [C4C1Im][PF6]. Within the margin of error (±10 %), the quantitative analysis at 0° agrees very well with the nominal composition of [C4C1Im][PF6] (see Table 1 a).
Figure 2
F 1s (left), N 1s (center) and C 1s (right) spectra, at 0° (black) and 80° (red) emission: a) Neat [C4C1Im][PF6], b)–e) mixtures of [PFBMIm][PF6] with [C4C1Im][PF6] at molar ratios of b) 10 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], c) 25 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], d) 50 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6] and e) 75 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], and f) neat [PFBMIm][PF6]. All spectra were acquired at a sample temperature of 95 °C.
Table 1
Quantitative analysis of the 0° and 80° XP spectra at 95 °C. Nominal and experimentally determined contents (mole fraction) are given for all elements using ASFs from Ref. 18. a) Neat [C4C1Im][PF6], b)–e) mixtures of [PFBMIm][PF6] with [C4C1Im][PF6] at molar ratios of b) 10 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], c) 25 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], d) 50 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6] and e) 75 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], and f) neat [PFBMIm][PF6].
Core levels
F 1s
F 1s
N 1s
C 1s
C 1s
C 1s
C 1s
P 2p
a) [C4C1Im][PF6]
FCFx
FPF6
NIm
CCFx
C2
Chetero‘
Calkyl
PPF6
BE/eV
–/–
686.6
402.0
–/–
287.5
286.6
285.1
136.9
ASF
1.00
1.00
0.46
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.46
nominal
–/–
6.0
2.0
–/–
1.0
4.0
3.0
1.0
0° emission
–/–
6.4
2.0
–/–
0.9
3.8
2.9
1.1
80° emission
–/–
6.0
1.9
–/–
0.9
3.7
3.4
1.1
b) 10 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6]
FCFx
FPF6
NIm
CCFx
C2
Chetero‘
Calkyl
PPF6
nominal
0.5
6.0
2.0
0.2
1.0
4.1
2.7
1.0
0° emission
0.9
6.2
2.0
0.2
0.7
4.3
2.3
1.1
80° emission
1.6
5.4
1.8
0.4
0.6
4.3
2.3
1.1
c) 25 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6]
FCFx
FPF6
NIm
CCFx
C2
Chetero‘
Calkyl
PPF6
nominal
1.3
6.0
2.0
0.5
1.0
4.3
2.3
1.0
0° emission
1.8
6.1
1.9
0.5
0.8
4.4
1.8
1.1
80° emission
3.0
5.2
1.7
0.8
0.7
4.2
1.7
1.0
d) 50 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6]
FCFx
FPF6
NIm
CCFx
C2
Chetero‘
Calkyl
PPF6
nominal
2.5
6.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
4.5
1.5
1.0
0° emission
3.1
6.1
1.9
0.9
0.9
4.4
1.2
1.1
80° emission
4.5
5.1
1.7
1.2
0.8
4.1
1.0
1.0
e) 75 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6]
FCFx
FPF6
NIm
CCFx
C2
Chetero‘
Calkyl
PPF6
nominal
3.8
6.0
2.0
1.5
1.0
4.8
0.8
1.0
0° emission
4.2
6.0
1.9
1.4
1.0
4.6
0.5
1.1
80° emission
5.8
4.9
1.7
1.8
1.0
4.2
0.4
1.0
f) [PFBMIm][PF6]
FCFx
FPF6
NIm
CCFx
C2
Chetero‘
Calkyl
PPF6
BE/eV
688.9
686.8
402.2
291.3/293.6
287.8
286.8
–/–
137.0
nominal
5.0
6.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
5.0
–/–
1.0
0° emission
5.6
6.0
1.9
1.8
1.0
4.6
–/–
1.1
80° emission
7.0
5.0
1.7
2.1
1.0
4.1
–/–
1.0
F 1s (left), N 1s (center) and C 1s (right) spectra, at 0° (black) and 80° (red) emission: a) Neat [C4C1Im][PF6], b)–e) mixtures of [PFBMIm][PF6] with [C4C1Im][PF6] at molar ratios of b) 10 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], c) 25 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], d) 50 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6] and e) 75 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], and f) neat [PFBMIm][PF6]. All spectra were acquired at a sample temperature of 95 °C.Quantitative analysis of the 0° and 80° XP spectra at 95 °C. Nominal and experimentally determined contents (mole fraction) are given for all elements using ASFs from Ref. 18. a) Neat [C4C1Im][PF6], b)–e) mixtures of [PFBMIm][PF6] with [C4C1Im][PF6] at molar ratios of b) 10 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], c) 25 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], d) 50 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6] and e) 75 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], and f) neat [PFBMIm][PF6].Core levelsF 1sF 1sN 1sC 1sC 1sC 1sC 1sP 2pa) [C4C1Im][PF6]FCFxFPF6NImCCFxC2Chetero‘CalkylPPF6BE/eV–/–686.6402.0–/–287.5286.6285.1136.9ASF1.001.000.460.300.300.300.300.46nominal–/–6.02.0–/–1.04.03.01.00° emission–/–6.42.0–/–0.93.82.91.180° emission–/–6.01.9–/–0.93.73.41.1b) 10 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6]FCFxFPF6NImCCFxC2Chetero‘CalkylPPF6nominal0.56.02.00.21.04.12.71.00° emission0.96.22.00.20.74.32.31.180° emission1.65.41.80.40.64.32.31.1c) 25 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6]FCFxFPF6NImCCFxC2Chetero‘CalkylPPF6nominal1.36.02.00.51.04.32.31.00° emission1.86.11.90.50.84.41.81.180° emission3.05.21.70.80.74.21.71.0d) 50 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6]FCFxFPF6NImCCFxC2Chetero‘CalkylPPF6nominal2.56.02.01.01.04.51.51.00° emission3.16.11.90.90.94.41.21.180° emission4.55.11.71.20.84.11.01.0e) 75 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6]FCFxFPF6NImCCFxC2Chetero‘CalkylPPF6nominal3.86.02.01.51.04.80.81.00° emission4.26.01.91.41.04.60.51.180° emission5.84.91.71.81.04.20.41.0f) [PFBMIm][PF6]FCFxFPF6NImCCFxC2Chetero‘CalkylPPF6BE/eV688.9686.8402.2291.3/293.6287.8286.8–/–137.0nominal5.06.02.02.01.05.0–/–1.00° emission5.66.01.91.81.04.6–/–1.180° emission7.05.01.72.11.04.1–/–1.0When comparing the 80° (red) and 0° (black) emission spectra of [C4C1Im][PF6] in Figure 2 a, we find a slight increase of the Calkyl signal at 80°, indicating a slight enrichment of the butyl chain at the IL/vacuum interface. Such an enrichment is generally known in literature for non‐functionalized [CC1Im]+ cations with alkyl chains with n≥4.22 In line with this enrichment, we find a decrease of the FPF6 and NIm signals at 80°, indicating a slight depletion of the [PF6]− anion and the imidazolium ring of the cation from the IL/vacuum interface.
Neat [PFBMIm][PF6]
The XP spectra of [PFBMIm][PF6] are depicted in Figure 2 f. We recently investigated ultrathin layers of this IL on a Ag(111) surface in the monolayer range, using a non‐monochromated Al Kα X‐ray source in another XP setup.17 In the following, we now present the high‐resolution spectra of a thick film.At 0° emission (black spectrum), the F 1s spectrum (left panel) displays two peaks, which arise from the fluorine atoms in two different chemical environments: The peak at 688.9 eV stems from the five FCFx atoms (CFx=CF2 and CF3 groups) of the fluorinated chain in the [PFBMIm]+ cation, and the peak at 686.8 eV from the six FPF6 atoms of the [PF6]− anion. In the N 1s region (center panel), a single peak is observed at 402.2 eV, due to the NIm atoms of the imidazolium ring. In the C 1s region (right panel), the peaks at 293.6 and 291.3 eV stem from the CCF3 and CCF2 groups of the fluorinated butyl chain of the [PFBMIm]+ cation. The peak at lower binding energy consists of two peaks due to the C2 atom at 287.8 eV and the Chetero’ atoms at 286.8 eV. The P 2p spectrum (Figure S1f in the Supporting Information) displays the spin‐orbit‐split PPF6 peak of the anion centered at 137.0 eV. Again, the absence of O 1s and Si 2p signals (see Figure S1f in the Supporting Information) indicates that [PFBMIm][PF6] is clean.21 This is further confirmed by the fact that the quantitative analysis at 0° agrees very well with the nominally expected composition of [PFBMIm][PF6] (see Table 1 f).Next, we compare the spectra at 80° in Figure 2 f to those at 0° emission. In the F 1s spectrum, clearly a strong increase of the FCFx peak of the fluorinated chain at 80° is observed that goes along with a pronounced decrease of the FPF6 signal. This behavior indicates that the fluorinated chain of the cation is enriched at the IL/vacuum interface, while the [PF6]− anion is surface‐depleted. The enrichment of the fluorinated chain is also reflected by the increase of the CCF3 and CCF2 peaks in the C 1s region at 80°. This increase goes along with a decrease of the C2 and Chetero’ peaks and also of the NIm signal in the N 1s region; both observations indicate a surface depletion of the imidazolium ring of the [PFBMIm]+ cation. In the P 2p spectrum, changing the emission angle from 0° to 80° emission leads to a small decrease.
Mixtures of [PFBMIm][PF6] and [C4C1Im][PF6]
To search for preferential enrichment effects of different cations in mixtures of [PFBMIm][PF6] and [C4C1Im][PF6] as a function of the composition, we studied four mixtures with molar ratios of 10, 25, 50 and 75 mol % of [PFBMIm][PF6]. The corresponding XP spectra are depicted in Figure 2 b–2e, respectively, for emission angles of 0° (black) and 80° (red).We start with the discussion of the F 1s spectra (left panel) at 0°. In addition to the FPF6 peak of the anion at 686.7 eV, all spectra display the FCFx peak of the cation at 688.9 eV. The intensity of the latter peak increases with increasing molar ratio, as is expected. In all cases, the N 1s spectra (center panel) show a single peak, NIm, at 402.1 eV originating from the nitrogen atoms in the imidazolium rings of both the [PFBMIm]+ and the [C4C1Im]+ cations. In the C 1s region (right panel), we find five peaks for all mixtures. The peaks at 293.6 and 291.3 eV are due to the CCF3 and CCF2 atoms of the [PFBMIm]+ cation, respectively. The Calkyl peak of the [C4C1Im]+ cation is observed at 285.1 eV, and the Chetero’ peak with the C2 shoulder is found at 286.7 and 287.7 eV, respectively. The spin‐orbit‐split P 2p peaks of the [PF6]− anion are centered at 137.0 eV (see Figure S1b–S1e in the Supporting Information). Within the margin of error (±0.2 eV) the peaks in all regions have the same binding energy like in the neat ILs. Again, no signals are detected in the Si 2p and O 1s spectra (Figure S1b–S1e in the Supporting Information), verifying that no contaminations are transferred to the mixture by using acetonitrile as a co‐solvent when preparing the mixtures. Within the margin of error, the quantitative analyses are in line with the nominal compositions of the mixtures of [PFBMIm][PF6] and [C4C1Im][PF6], except for a general too high content of FCFx atoms and a too low content of Calkyl atoms, derived from the bulk‐sensitive measurements at 0° (Table 1 b–1f). This observation indicates that strong enrichment and depletion effects are not only visible in 80° measurements but also in 0° emission (see also below). Recently, the deviation from the nominal bulk values at 0° emission, and therefore the pronounced enrichment/depletion of one of the species of mixtures, was reported by our group and others.6b, 10aNext, we analyze the XP spectra at 80°. For all mixtures, a significant increase of the FCFx peak at 688.9 eV indicates a clear surface enrichment of the fluorinated chain, similar to the observation for neat [PFBMIm][PF6]. Interestingly, the increase of the FCFx signal at 80° relative to that at 0° is most pronounced for the mixture with the lowest molar ratio of 10 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6]. With increasing molar ratio, this enhancement continuously decreases. To visualize this behavior, we plotted the normalized FCFx content, that is, the experimentally determined content (mole fraction) divided by the nominal content (see Table 1) as a function of the molar ratio in Figure 3 a (red squares). A value of 1.0 would represent the situation, where the surface composition is identical to that in the bulk, that is, no surface enrichment. Figure 3 a shows a strong increase of the normalized FCFx content with decreasing molar ratio of [PFBMIm][PF6]. This behavior clearly indicates that the surface enrichment of the fluorinated chain in the outermost layer (relative to the bulk) strongly increases for low molar ratios, that is, the surface of the mixture is preferentially terminated with the fluorinated chain.
Figure 3
a) Normalized content of FCFx (red squares), FPF6 (green circles) and NIm (blue triangles) for 80° emission (data from Figure 2 and Table 1 a–1f). In each case, the experimentally determined content is divided by the nominal content. b) Ratio of the normalized FCFx and FPF6 contents, at 0° (black) and 80° (red) emission angle. In all cases, the sample temperature was 95 °C. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the nominal compositions.
a) Normalized content of FCFx (red squares), FPF6 (green circles) and NIm (blue triangles) for 80° emission (data from Figure 2 and Table 1 a–1f). In each case, the experimentally determined content is divided by the nominal content. b) Ratio of the normalized FCFx and FPF6 contents, at 0° (black) and 80° (red) emission angle. In all cases, the sample temperature was 95 °C. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the nominal compositions.This enrichment of the fluorinated chain is also detected in the C 1s region (Figure 2 b–2e, right panel) at 80°, where we observe an intensity increase of the CCF3 and CCF2 peaks. Generally, the effect is less pronounced than in the F 1s region, which is due to the higher kinetic energy of the C 1s photoelectrons of around 1200 eV as compared to around 800 eV for F 1s, which leads to a larger information depth of the former. In contrast to the increase of the CFx signal of the fluorinated chains of [PFBMIm]+, the Calkyl signal of the alkyl chains of [C4C1Im]+ has decreased at 80° for all IL mixtures. This behavior is in contrast to the situation for neat [C4C1Im][PF6] in Figure 2 a and for neat ILs with longer alkyl chains,22 and indicates that the alkyl chains in the mixtures studied here are depleted from the liquid/vacuum interface. The driving force is a competing effect between the fluorinated chain of the [PFBMIm]+ cation and the non‐fluorinated side chain of the [C4C1Im]+ cation: The selective enrichment of the [PFBMIm]+ cations is attributed to a (typically) larger surface tension of ILs with an alkyl chain compared to a fluorinated chain.1b, 6a, 23The analysis of the FPF6 and PPF6 signals of the [PF6]− anion, as well as the Chetero’ and NIm signals of the imidazolium ring of the cation at 80° show for all mixtures (Figure 2 b–2e and Figure S1b–S1e in the Supporting Information) more or less the same behavior as for the two neat ILs (Figure 2 a and 2f). The 80° signals are up to 20 % smaller than the 0° signals, which results from the damping of the corresponding signals by the surface‐enriched alkyl and fluorinated chains. In Figure 3 a, we plotted the normalized FPF6 and NIm contents (green circles and blue triangles, respectively) as a function of the molar ratio. For both, we find values smaller than 1.0, which reflect the described damping. The data corresponding to the anion and the imidazolium ring are identical, indicating that both are at the same distance from the surface.To visualize the relative enrichment of the fluorinated chain of the cation relative to the anion (and thus also to the cation head group), we plot the ratio of the normalized FCFx and FPF6 contents (data from Figure 3 a), that is, (FCFx/FCFx,nom) / (FPF6/FPF6,nom), as a function of the molar ratio in Figure 3 b. We will use this type of presentation later for the temperature‐dependent studies. The strong increase of the 80° signal with decreasing molar ratio again reflects the pronounced surface enrichment of the fluorinated chain of the [PFBMIm]+ cation. Interestingly, we also find a clear increase of the ratio of the normalized FCFx and FPF6 contents for 0°. This behavior again indicates that strong selective enrichment effects are not only observed at 80° but also at 0° (see above).
Temperature dependence of surface enrichment
As a next step, we address the temperature dependence of the XP spectra for the two neat ILs and the IL mixtures, by cooling the ILs from 95 °C down to the temperature, where solidification starts, which is typically indicated by the onset of charging. The F 1s and C 1s spectra of the neat ILs and the IL mixtures are shown in Figures 4 a–4f and 5a–5f, respectively. Due to the higher surface sensitivity, we focus on the spectra at 80°, since enrichment/depletion effects are better visible at this angle than at 0° emission. The quantitative analysis of the ratios of the normalized FCFx and FPF6 contents at 80° and also at 0° are shown in Figure 6 b–6 f.
Figure 4
F 1s spectra measured at 80° emission, collected during cooling from 95 °C to lower temperatures: a) Neat [C4C1Im][PF6], b)–e) mixtures of [PFBMIm][PF6] with [C4C1Im][PF6] at molar ratios of b) 10 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], c) 25 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], d) 50 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6] and e) 75 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], and f) neat [PFBMIm][PF6].
Figure 6
Ratio of the normalized FCFx and FPF6 contents, at 0° (black) and 80° (red) emission angle, obtained during cooling from 95 °C to lower temperatures. a) Neat [C4C1Im][PF6]: Not shown, since this IL contains no FCFx signal from a fluorinated chain, b)–e) mixtures of [PFBMIm][PF6] with [C4C1Im][PF6] at molar ratios of b) 10 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], c) 25 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], d) 50 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6] and e) 75 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], and f) neat [PFBMIm][PF6]. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the nominal compositions.
F 1s spectra measured at 80° emission, collected during cooling from 95 °C to lower temperatures: a) Neat [C4C1Im][PF6], b)–e) mixtures of [PFBMIm][PF6] with [C4C1Im][PF6] at molar ratios of b) 10 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], c) 25 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], d) 50 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6] and e) 75 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], and f) neat [PFBMIm][PF6].For neat [C4C1Im][PF6], we find a slight continuous decrease of the FPF6 signal in Figure 4 a by around 15 % upon cooling from 95 °C to −55 °C. The Chetero’ signal in Figure 5 a shows a comparable decrease of 8 %; in contrast to this behavior, the Calkyl continuously increases. At 95 °C, the Calkyl peak is smaller than the Chetero’ peak, but at −55 °C the intensities are reversed. This behavior indicates an increasing surface enrichment of the butyl chain with decreasing temperature. Similar effects have been observed in literature24 for [C8C1Im]X with X−=Br, [TfO], [Tf2N] and [CC1Im][TfO] (n=4, 8, 18). We assign these effects to the increase in magnitude of the entropic term −TΔS
with temperature, which favors a more random distribution of the constituents with increasing temperature. This term counteracts the enthalpic driving force favoring surface enrichment of the fluorinated chain at low temperature, due to lowering of the surface tension (see above).
Figure 5
C 1s spectra measured at 80° emission, collected during cooling from 95 °C to lower temperatures: a) Neat [C4C1Im][PF6], b)–e) mixtures of [PFBMIm][PF6] with [C4C1Im][PF6] at molar ratios of b) 10 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], c) 25 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], d) 50 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6] and e) 75 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], and f) neat [PFBMIm][PF6].
C 1s spectra measured at 80° emission, collected during cooling from 95 °C to lower temperatures: a) Neat [C4C1Im][PF6], b)–e) mixtures of [PFBMIm][PF6] with [C4C1Im][PF6] at molar ratios of b) 10 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], c) 25 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], d) 50 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6] and e) 75 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], and f) neat [PFBMIm][PF6].Upon further temperature decrease, the Calkyl intensity continues to increase, until at −70 °C charging and peak broadening starts (not shown). This temperature is in accordance with the glass transition temperature of [C4C1Im][PF6] at around −77 °C.20 Subsequent heating the sample up to 95 °C yields the same spectra (within the margin of error) as observed before starting the cooling experiment.For neat [PFBMIm][PF6], we again observe a slow decrease of the FPF6 peak at 80° during cooling from 95 to 25 °C in Figure 4 f; at the same time, the FCFx intensity remains more or less unchanged. The resulting increase of the ratio of the normalized FCFx and FPF6 contents in Figure 6 f indicates a slight increase of the surface enrichment of the fluorinated chain with decreasing temperature. No significant changes are initially observed in the C 1s region (Figure 5 f, spectra at 95 °C and 55 °C). Starting at 20 °C, peak broadening and an intensity decrease of all IL peaks indicate the onset of solidification of [PFBMIm][PF6]. Since bulk [PFBMIm][PF6] melts at 66 °C,17 the onset of solidification at a temperature as low as at 20 °C indicates that this IL undergoes supercooling. Upon heating the IL back to 95 °C, we observe an intensity loss of about 18 % of the FPF6 signal (not shown), whereas the FCFx signal completely recovers (to within 3 %). A closer look to the other spectra in 80° emission shows that the N 1s XP spectrum shows a shoulder towards lower binding energy, indicating radiation damage25 over a prolonged exposure to X‐rays (notably, the conclusions derived here are not affected by beam damage).Ratio of the normalized FCFx and FPF6 contents, at 0° (black) and 80° (red) emission angle, obtained during cooling from 95 °C to lower temperatures. a) Neat [C4C1Im][PF6]: Not shown, since this IL contains no FCFx signal from a fluorinated chain, b)–e) mixtures of [PFBMIm][PF6] with [C4C1Im][PF6] at molar ratios of b) 10 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], c) 25 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], d) 50 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6] and e) 75 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], and f) neat [PFBMIm][PF6]. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the nominal compositions.Next, we discuss the behavior for the different IL mixtures upon cooling. The F 1s and C 1s spectra for selected temperatures are shown in Figures 4 b–4 e and 5 b–5e, respectively. The lowest possible temperature for XPS upon cooling depends on the molar ratio, because the solidification temperature increases with increasing [PFBMIm][PF6] content. Overall, the ILs with molar ratios of 10, 25 and 50 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6] display the same behavior. Upon cooling from 95 °C to lower temperatures, the FCFx peaks gain intensity and the ratios of the normalized FCFx and FPF6 contents for 80° in Figure 6 b–6d increase. Notably, for 0° this increase is much less pronounced (black symbols in Figure 6). The increase of the FCFx intensity (see Figure 4 b–4d) detected in 80° indicates an increasing surface enrichment of the fluorinated chain of the [PFBMIm]+ cation in the IL mixtures upon cooling. The driving force for the increase of surface enrichment of the fluorinated chains at lower temperatures, or—in other words—the higher degree of disorder at higher temperatures in the mixtures is again attributed to the entropic contributions.Below a certain temperature for each mixture (about −55 °C for 10 mol %, −45 °C for 25 mol % and −35 °C for 50 mol %), all signals shift towards higher binding energy and peak broadening indicates solidification and therefore charging (note that for a given mixture these temperatures were found to vary by ±5 °C due to the supercooling effects). The corresponding data is not included in Figures 4–6. The intensities of the CCF3 and CCF2 peaks in Figure 5 b–5 d increase slightly upon cooling, as expected. If the mixtures are subsequently heated to 95 °C, nearly the original F 1s and C 1s spectra are obtained, confirming reversibility of the temperature‐dependent experiment without notable changes due to prolonged X‐ray exposure.For the molar ratio of 75 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], we observe a quite different behavior. Initially, the F 1s and C 1s spectra in Figures 4 e and 5 e, respectively, and the ratio of the normalized FCFx and FPF6 contents at 80° and also at 0° in Figure 6 e show the same continuous increase than found for the lower molar ratios. This behavior again indicates an increasing surface enrichment of the fluorinated chain of the [PFBMIm]+ cation in the mixture with decreasing temperature. Between 35 and 20 °C, however, the FCFx intensity decreases by about 40 % while the FPF6 intensity stays constant. This leads to a pronounced decrease of their ratio in Figure 6 e. Upon further cooling, the ratio slightly increases again, with a similar slope than above 35 °C. Peak broadening due to charging starts at −10 °C indicating the onset of solidification of the [PFBMIm][PF6]‐depleted mixture. The corresponding C 1s spectra of the 75 mol % mixture (see Figure 5 e) display an intensity increase of the Calkyl peak between 35 and 20 °C, whereas the CCF2 and CCF3 peaks lose intensity. No further changes are observed until the start of peak broadening at −10 °C. We assign the sharp decrease of the peaks of the fluorinated chain (FCFx, CCF3 and CCF2) to a partial solidification of a [PFBMIm][PF6]‐rich or pure [PFBMIm][PF6] phase, which is depleted from the outer surface beyond the XPS information depth, or even forms a solid precipitate at the buried solid/liquid interface with the support. The remaining liquid mixture is therefore [PFBMIm][PF6]‐depleted and [C4C1Im][PF6]‐rich, which leads to the decrease of the FCFx signal and an increase of the Calkyl signal. The peak broadening at −10 °C then indicates the solidification of this residual mixture. After subsequent heating of the mixture to 95 °C, we find the same peak intensities (within the margin of error) as before the cooling experiment; this behavior signals the re‐dissolution and mixing of [PFBMIm][PF6] and [C4C1Im][PF6] during heating the mixture. Notably, the precipitation of one of the ILs from the mixture was only observed for high [PFBMIm][PF6] content such as 75 mol % (a very similar behavior was also detected for a 85 mol % mixture, see Figure S2 in the Supporting Information), and not in any of the other mixtures (10, 25 and 50 mol % mixtures). It should be noted that the magnitude of the abrupt decrease of the ratio in Figure 6 e between 35 and 20 °C varied from experiment to experiment. Such a behavior is typical for liquids that show supercooling, as slight contaminations or other disturbances might induce or prevent spontaneous solidification. Recently, a similar phenomenon was reported for mixtures of Cs[Tf2N] and [PPh4][Tf2N], where the temperature‐dependent depletion of tetraphenylphosphonium, [PPh4]+, from the near‐surface region (information depth) was observed by XPS.19 In order to correlate surface phenomena as described in this last section with liquid‐solid phase transitions in the bulk of IL mixtures in more detail, a combination of surface‐sensitive ARXPS with other methods such as differential scanning calorimetry, scattering or microscopy techniques would be very helpful, but are out of the scope of this article.
Conclusions
We used angle‐resolved X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy to study mixtures of fluorinated and non‐fluorinated ILs, namely [PFBMIm][PF6] and [C4C1Im][PF6], with molar ratios of 10, 25, 50 and 75 mol % [PFBMIm][PF6], along with the two neat ILs, at 95 °C and while cooling to lower temperatures. The two ILs contain the same anion, [PF6]−, but different cations. By performing very surface‐sensitive measurements at an emission angle of 80°, we observe surface enrichment of the fluorinated chain for neat [PFBMIm][PF6] relative to the bulk composition. This effect is in line with the general observation that fluorinated groups in the outermost layer lead to a lower surface tension than alkyl groups.1b, 6a, 23 The lower the molar ratio of [PFBMIm][PF6] in the mixture, the more pronounced is the surface enrichment of the fluorinated chain relative to the bulk composition. Upon cooling the mixtures from their liquid phase at 95 °C to their solidification, we observe a similar behavior for the 10, 25 and 50 mol % mixtures, and also for neat [PFBMIm][PF6]: Decreasing the temperature leads to an increase in surface enrichment of the fluorinated chain of [PFBMIm][PF6] (relative to the bulk composition), which is detected in the F 1s and C 1s spectra. We attribute the observed behavior to entropic reasons, namely a less pronounced enrichment of the fluorinated chains, that is, a lower degree of order, at high temperatures. The 75 mol % mixture shows the same increase in enrichment of the fluorinated chain as the other mixtures when cooling down to 35 °C. Upon further cooling to 20 °C, however, the surface enrichment of the fluorinated chain decreases drastically. This observation is attributed to a (partial) precipitation of the pure [PFBMIm][PF6], which in turn results in a [C4C1Im][PF6]‐rich phase at the topmost layer of the mixture. This change in composition is also reflected by an increase of the Calkyl peak in the C 1s spectrum when comparing the 35 and 20 °C spectra.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.SupplementaryClick here for additional data file.
Authors: C Kolbeck; T Cremer; K R J Lovelock; N Paape; P S Schulz; P Wasserscheid; F Maier; H-P Steinrück Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2009-06-25 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: E J Smoll; M A Tesa-Serrate; S M Purcell; L D'Andrea; D W Bruce; J M Slattery; M L Costen; T K Minton; K G McKendrick Journal: Faraday Discuss Date: 2017-09-25 Impact factor: 4.008
Authors: Duncan W Bruce; Christopher P Cabry; José N Canongia Lopes; Matthew L Costen; Lucía D'Andrea; Isabelle Grillo; Brooks C Marshall; Kenneth G McKendrick; Timothy K Minton; Simon M Purcell; Sarah Rogers; John M Slattery; Karina Shimizu; Eric Smoll; María A Tesa-Serrate Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2017-06-08 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: Matthew T Clough; Colin R Crick; John Gräsvik; Patricia A Hunt; Heiko Niedermeyer; Tom Welton; Oliver P Whitaker Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 9.825
Authors: Andreia Luís; Karina Shimizu; João M M Araújo; Pedro J Carvalho; José A Lopes-da-Silva; José N Canongia Lopes; Luís Paulo N Rebelo; João A P Coutinho; Mara G Freire; Ana B Pereiro Journal: Langmuir Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 3.882
Authors: Simon M Purcell; Paul D Lane; Lucía D'Andrea; Naomi S Elstone; Duncan W Bruce; John M Slattery; Eric J Smoll; Stuart J Greaves; Matthew L Costen; Timothy K Minton; Kenneth G McKendrick Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2022-02-28 Impact factor: 2.991