The gas-liquid interface of ionic liquids (ILs) is critically important in many applications, for example, in supported IL phase (SILP) catalysis. Methods to investigate the interfacial structure in these systems will allow their performance to be improved in a rational way. In this study, reactive-atom scattering (RAS), surface tension measurements, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were used to study the vacuum interface of mixtures of partially fluorinated and normal alkyl ILs. The underlying aim was to understand whether fluorinated IL ions could be used as additives to modify the surface structure of one of the most widely used families of alkyl ILs. The series of ILs 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([Cnmim][Tf2N]) with n = 4-12 were mixed with a fixed-length, semiperfluorinated analogue (1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctyl)-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([C8mimF13][Tf2N]), forming [Cnmim](1-x)[C8mimF13]x[Tf2N] mixtures, where x is the bulk mole fraction of the fluorinated component. The RAS-LIF method combined O-atom projectiles with laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) detection of the product OH as a measure of surface exposure of the alkyl chains. For [C8mim](1-x)[C8mimF13]x[Tf2N] mixtures, RAS-LIF OH yields are below those expected from stoichiometry. There are quantitatively consistent negative deviations from linearity of the surface tension. Both results imply that the lower-surface-tension fluoroalkyl material dominates the surface. A similar deficit is found for alkyl chain lengths n = 4, 6, 8, and 12 and for all (nonzero) x investigated by RAS-LIF. Accessible-surface-area (ASA) analyses of the MD simulations for [Cnmim](1-x)[C8mimF13]x[Tf2N] mixtures qualitatively reproduce the same primary effect of fluoro-chain predominance of the surface over most of the range of n. However, there are significant quantitative discrepancies between MD ASA predictions and experiment relating to the strength of any n-dependence of the relative alkyl coverage at fixed x, and on the x-dependence at fixed n. These discrepancies are discussed in the context of detailed examinations of the surface structures predicted in the MD simulations. Potential explanations, beyond experimental artifacts, include inadequacies in the classical force fields used in the MD simulations or the inability of simple ASA algorithms to capture dynamical factors that influence RAS-LIF yields.
The gas-liquid interface of ionic liquids (ILs) is critically important in many applications, for example, in supported IL phase (SILP) catalysis. Methods to investigate the interfacial structure in these systems will allow their performance to be improved in a rational way. In this study, reactive-atom scattering (RAS), surface tension measurements, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were used to study the vacuum interface of mixtures of partially fluorinated and normal alkyl ILs. The underlying aim was to understand whether fluorinated IL ions could be used as additives to modify the surface structure of one of the most widely used families of alkyl ILs. The series of ILs 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([Cnmim][Tf2N]) with n = 4-12 were mixed with a fixed-length, semiperfluorinated analogue (1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctyl)-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([C8mimF13][Tf2N]), forming [Cnmim](1-x)[C8mimF13]x[Tf2N] mixtures, where x is the bulk mole fraction of the fluorinated component. The RAS-LIF method combined O-atom projectiles with laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) detection of the product OH as a measure of surface exposure of the alkyl chains. For [C8mim](1-x)[C8mimF13]x[Tf2N] mixtures, RAS-LIF OH yields are below those expected from stoichiometry. There are quantitatively consistent negative deviations from linearity of the surface tension. Both results imply that the lower-surface-tension fluoroalkyl material dominates the surface. A similar deficit is found for alkyl chain lengths n = 4, 6, 8, and 12 and for all (nonzero) x investigated by RAS-LIF. Accessible-surface-area (ASA) analyses of the MD simulations for [Cnmim](1-x)[C8mimF13]x[Tf2N] mixtures qualitatively reproduce the same primary effect of fluoro-chain predominance of the surface over most of the range of n. However, there are significant quantitative discrepancies between MD ASA predictions and experiment relating to the strength of any n-dependence of the relative alkyl coverage at fixed x, and on the x-dependence at fixed n. These discrepancies are discussed in the context of detailed examinations of the surface structures predicted in the MD simulations. Potential explanations, beyond experimental artifacts, include inadequacies in the classical force fields used in the MD simulations or the inability of simple ASA algorithms to capture dynamical factors that influence RAS-LIF yields.
Ionic liquids (ILs)
are regarded as salts that are liquid below
100 °C. They are typically composed of large organic cations
paired with a wide variety of anions, with the absence of molecular
symmetry helping to disrupt efficient packing and delocalized charges
minimizing the strength of Coulomb interactions. ILs have attracted
a very large amount of interest in recent decades due to their prospects
as alternative reaction media, with diverse potential applications
spanning, for example, catalysis,[1−10] carbon-capture and storage,[11,12] biomass processing,[13,14] electrolytes in batteries,[15−20] supercapacitors,[21,22] and dye-sensitized solar cells.[23]The focus here will be on the surface
properties of ILs, which
have in general been recognized to be of substantial interest because
they are expected to play a crucial role in a number of very important
applications; these include gas separation, sequestration and forms
of multiphase catalysis (e.g., supported ionic-liquid phase catalysis[24−29]). In particular, we will address the question of whether adding
a second component (in this case a fluorinated IL) in known proportions
might provide a method to systematically alter the surface properties
of one of the most widely used alkyl IL families. This has interesting
potential prospects for future exploitation. For example, in multiphase
catalytic systems, tailored layers of distinct chemical composition
might be used to control the accommodation of gases and their transport
through the gas–liquid interface or alter the depth at which
homogeneous catalyst molecules are held.It is now well established
that the bulk structures of many ILs
exhibit microheterogeneity, with nanoseparation into polar and nonpolar
domains.[30−33] This behavior is promoted by pendant alkyl chains on either the
cation or anion, which occupy the nonpolar domains, interpenetrated
by polar domains consisting mainly of cation headgroups with attendant
anions. The incorporation of alkyl chains is a very common motif in
ILs used in practical applications, with variations in the chain length
being used to fine-tune other desired physical properties, for example,
liquid crystallinity.[34]Microheterogeneity
extends also to IL surfaces, with a clear tendency
for longer alkyl chains to occupy the gas (or vacuum)–liquid
interface preferentially in a range of common IL systems; this has
been established through an array of physical techniques including,
for example, angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ARXPS),
low-energy ion scattering, Rutherford back scattering (RBS), metastable-atom
electron spectroscopy, secondary-ion mass spectrometry (SIMS), neutron
reflectivity, X-ray reflectivity, sum-frequency generation (SFG),
and second-harmonic generation.[35−46]Our own contribution to demonstrating this phenomenon has
been
through the development of the technique of reactive-atom scattering
(RAS). In this method, reactive atomic projectiles are directed at
a liquid surface and gas-phase products detected which are characteristic
of the reaction with a specific functional group exposed at the liquid
surface.[32,47−56] In one variant, as will be used here, the products are detected
by laser-induced fluorescence (hence RAS-LIF).[32,47,48,50,52−55] An alternative, developed independently in the Minton
group, is to use mass-spectrometric detection (RAS-MS).[49−51,54,56] We have shown the power of the RAS-LIF and RAS-MS methods to analyze
the extreme outer surfaces of a number of IL systems, including homologous
series of imidazolium- and pyrrolidinium-based liquids, the coupled
effects of variation of the anion, and even liquid-crystalline materials.[47−53] The majority of this work has used ground-state oxygen, O(3P), atoms as the projectile, with the detection of OH (RAS-LIF) or
inelastically scattered O, OH, and H2O (RAS-MS). Recently,
we have also shown that RAS-MS can be extended to F(2P)
projectiles, combined with the detection of HF, or DF for isotopically
labeled samples, giving detailed site-specific information on the
occupancy and orientation of cations at the surface.[56]All the experimental methods above have strengths
and weaknesses.
They vary in their chemical specificity and penetration depth, i.e.,
what ultimately constitutes “the surface” of the liquid.
Consequently, complementary molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have
also played a very important role in this field.[30−32,45,57] Unlike any single current
experimental technique, they can, in principle, give a full molecular-level
description of the interfacial region over the full range of depths.
However, these simulations are ultimately only as reliable as the
force fields and other aspects of the MD methodology used, so it is
crucial to test their predictions against experimental observations.
This is also an aspect on which we focus closely in this work.The search for materials with tunable properties for a given application
is beset by the rapidly diverging combinatorial possibilities arising
from trial-and-error testing of all conceivable binary combinations
of cations and anions. A promising, but as yet relatively underexplored,
strategy is to generate mixtures of a pair (or other small number
as a basis set) of ILs in different proportions.[58−61] The progression in bulk properties
and interesting variations in underlying nanostructure has been demonstrated,
for example, in mixtures of short- and long-chain versions of a common
cation combined with a common anion.[32] We
have also investigated the competition for surface sites between long
and short chains in such mixtures based on the widely studied 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium
cation (labeled [Cmim]+, where n is the length of the alkyl side chain), combined with
the common anion bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([Tf2N]−). In a study that is technically closest to
the current work, we showed that RAS-LIF can be used successfully
to investigate the surfaces of [C2mim]1–[C12mim] [Tf2N] mixtures.[32] We found a clear
nonstoichiometric preference for the longer chains to occupy the surface
over most of the mole-fraction range. There were corresponding changes
to the nanoscopic domain structure in the bulk, as determined experimentally
by neutron and X-ray scattering, and complemented by extensive MD
simulations. We have examined the applicability of fitting functions
based on established physical models for the deviation from stoichiometric
surface coverage and discussed how our RAS-LIF observations relate
to other independent observations for sparser sets of related mixtures
using ARXPS, RBS, and SIMS.[37,55,62,63]An obvious alternative
to combinations of different chain lengths
is mixtures of distinct chemical functionality. A class of pure ILs
generating interest in their own right is those containing fluorinated
chains on either the cation or the anion.[64] This is also the chemically novel aspect that we exploit in the
current work. The well-known differences in molecular-level properties
(volume, stiffness, polarity, and polarizability) induced by fluorination
can be expected to lead to corresponding changes in the physical properties
[density, viscosity, hydrophobicity, surface tension (ST), etc.] relative
to their alkyl analogues. Both types of chain can be present in the
same material; this can be achieved either in a single-component IL,
for example, by attaching different chain types to the cation and
anion, respectively, or by attaching both types of chain to the cation.[65] Variations in properties can then be investigated
by synthesizing different materials with different combinations of
chain type and length. Alternatively, two distinct ILs, one containing
alkyl chains and the other fluoroalkyl chains, can be mixed in different
proportions.[66] It is this latter approach
that is of particular interest here.Recent work has begun to
unravel in more detail the bulk structure
and properties of fluorinated ILs and their mixtures.[64−76] The existence of fluorinated domains in various fluorinated IL systems
has been predicted through MD modeling and confirmed experimentally
through neutron and X-ray scattering. In particular, MD simulations
of mixtures of alkyl- and fluoroalkylimidazolium ILs by Hollóczki
et al. revealed bulk “triphilic” behavior.[66,77] They identified three distinct domains in mixtures with essentially
equal (C8) alkyl and fluoroalkyl cationic chain lengths combined with
a common anion (bromide); that is, polar (cation headgroups and anions),
nonpolar alkyl, and nonpolar fluorous domains. They speculated that
these unusual characteristics might allow ”smart” liquids
to be developed whose properties could be switched in predictable
ways through changes in composition or other stimuli such as temperature.The focus of the current work is the even more sparsely investigated
field of the surfaces of mixed alkyl/fluoroalkyl
IL systems. Information on the specific competition for surface sites
between alkyl and fluoroalkyl chains has been derived from ST measurements
in ILs consisting of alkylimidazolium cations and perfluorobutyl sulfonate
anions, and correlated with MD simulations of the corresponding structural
changes.[78] The perfluorinated butyl chains
of the anions appear to dominate the surface for cationic alkyl chains
shorter than C4, with the increase in penetration by longer alkyl
chains. The ST is minimized for C8, when the combined overall surface
density of alkyl and fluoroalkyl chains is maximized. It increases
again for longer alkyl chains, which become dominant at the surface.
Most recently, Heller et al. have investigated the
surfaces of mixtures of varying mole fractions of butyl and 3,3,4,4,4-pentafluorobutylimidazolium
cations combined with a common [PF6]− anion using ARXPS and through ST and surface light-scattering measurements.[79,80] The topmost layers were found to be enriched in pentafluorobutyl
chains, with the deviation from stoichiometry largest for the most
dilute mixture examined (10% pentafluorobutylimidazolium). The enrichment
was enhanced at lower temperatures, while the system remained liquid.
The surface preference for fluorinated chains has been shown to extend
to competition with methoxy-functionalized ILs.[81]As a relatively minor part of our previous work,[55] intended to demonstrate the universality of
the functional
form of the deviations from stoichiometry in different types of IL
mixtures, we presented preliminary, proof-of-principle RAS-LIF data
for a single fluoro/alkyl IL mixture. We expand the examination of
the surface properties of this class of material considerably in scope
and explore it in much more depth here. Thus, [C8mim][Tf2N] was mixed with its semiperfluorinated analogue (1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctyl)-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)
amide (which we label [C8mimF13][Tf2N]). The measured deficit of OH and hence of exposed
alkyl chains relative to the expectations from stoichiometry implied,
indirectly, that there must be a corresponding excess of fluoroalkyl chains at the surface. We present here a more extended,
systematic investigation of mixed alkyl/fluoroalkyl IL systems based
on the same fluorinated cation ([C8mimF13]+) mixed with alkylated cations of varying chain lengths ([Cmim]+ with n =
4–12). We address the question of whether the apparent higher
intrinsic surface preference for fluorinated over alkyl chains of
the same length might be counterbalanced by the also known increase
in surface activity of alkyl chains with the increase in chain length.[50] We examine the extent to which the RAS-LIF observations
are reproduced by large-scale MD simulations and what additional insights
they provide into the molecular-level organization of the surfaces
of these interesting materials.
Methods
Materials
The molecular structures of the liquids used
in this study are shown in Figure . Note the inclusion, for practical synthetic reasons,
of a −CH2CH2– linker next to the
ring in [C8mimF13][Tf2N]. [C8mimF13][Tf2N] was mixed with [Cmim][Tf2N], where n = 4, 6, 8, or 12—these mixtures are written here as [Cmim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N], where x is the bulk mole fraction of
the [C8mimF13][Tf2N] component. For n = 8 and 12, a full range of x was studied,
whereas for n = 4 or 6, a fixed mole fraction of x = 0.25 was used.
Figure 1
Molecular structures of the components of the
fluoroalkyl ionic–liquid
mixtures, along with the reference liquid, squalane. x indicates bulk mole fraction of the partially fluorinated [C8mimF13][Tf2N] component.
Molecular structures of the components of the
fluoroalkyl ionic–liquid
mixtures, along with the reference liquid, squalane. x indicates bulk mole fraction of the partially fluorinated [C8mimF13][Tf2N] component.The syntheses of [C8mim][NTf2] and
[C8mimF13][NTf2] have been described
previously,[55] as have those for [C4mim][Tf2N] and [C12mim][Tf2N].[32,56] [C6mim][NTf2] was
prepared in a directly analogous
manner from freshly distilled 1-methylimidazole and 1-bromohexane.
Commercial samples of [C8mim][Tf2N] (99%) and
[C12mim][Tf2N] (99.9%), used for confirmatory
RAS-LIF measurements at x = 0, were supplied by IoLiTec.
Water (prior to additional degassing, below) and halide content for
these liquids are given in Supporting Information 1.1. The branched hydrocarbon squalane was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich
(99%) and was used as a reference liquid in the RAS-LIF experiments.
All liquids were degassed overnight under vacuum (<10–6 mbar) to remove volatile components, prior to measurements being
taken.
Surface Tension
The ST of the [C8mim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N] mixtures were recorded
using a Krüss DSA100 tensiometer using the pendant drop method.
The instrument has a resolution of 0.01 mN m–1 and
an accuracy of 0.3 mN m–1. For all compositions,
eight or more measurements were recorded and averaged.
RAS-LIF
The RAS-LIF apparatus is shown in outline in Figure . A brief overview
is given here as detailed descriptions have been presented previously.[47,48,50,52−55] The liquid surface was created by rotating a partially immersed
wheel (diameter 5 cm, speed 30 rpm) in a bath of liquid. This dragged
a liquid film onto the wheel and created a continually refreshed liquid
surface. In the previous work, we have shown that the rotation speed
has no discernible influence on the results, even for liquid–crystalline
IL materials with much a longer-range order than those used here.[52] This is consistent with estimated distances
for one-dimensional diffusion of ions away from the surface in a suitable
fraction of the rotation period, which, using typical diffusion coefficients
for representative ILs,[82] are around three
orders of magnitude larger than the effective thickness of the surface
region as determined by MD simulations (see below). RAS-LIF results
using the same approach for related IL mixtures containing long and
short alkyl chains are also corroborated by other surface-sensitive
measurements on static samples.[32,55] We are therefore confident
that the surface formed represents an equilibrium structure. A carousel,
which housed four such wheels, allowed accurate relative measurements
to be made by being able to switch between wheels (by rotating the
carousel 90° successively about its central axis) without breaking
the vacuum. Passing parallel to one of the wheels (distance to the
center of the beam 6.7 mm), a pulsed photolysis laser beam (355 nm,
80 mJ, ∼6 ns fwhm) dissociated a low pressure (1 mTorr) of
NO2 precursor gas above the liquid surface. O(3P) atoms were generated with a distribution of translational energies
(mean 16 kJ mol–1, fwhm 26 kJ mol–1).[83]
Figure 2
Schematic diagram of the RAS-LIF apparatus.
The central, four-wheel
carousel could be rotated about its central axis, which allowed each
of the liquid wheels to be presented to the laser beams for study.
Schematic diagram of the RAS-LIF apparatus.
The central, four-wheel
carousel could be rotated about its central axis, which allowed each
of the liquid wheels to be presented to the laser beams for study.Some of the O-atoms incident at the liquid surface
reacted to form
OH via abstraction. For energetic reasons, as discussed further below,
the OH products are expected to be derived almost exclusively from
secondary aliphatic C–H bonds, and therefore, the amount of
OH detected is correlated directly with the surface exposure of −CH2– groups in the alkyl chains. OH in the gas phase was
detected via LIF excited on the A–X (1,0) band by a pulsed
probe laser beam (∼283 nm, 250 μJ, ∼5 ns fwhm)
that counter-propagated the photolysis beam. The OH fluorescence was
collected by a liquid light guide and, after optical filtering to
isolate the A–X(1,1) band, directed onto a photomultiplier
tube to provide a signal which is proportional to the number density
of OH molecules in the probe volume. For most measurements of relative
number densities, OH was probed on the most intense, Q1(1), line. A small background contribution to the OH density resulting
from direct photolysis of a contaminant in the NO2 precursor,
thought to be HONO, was subtracted for all liquids studied, as described
previously.[50,84]During RAS-LIF measurements,
all liquids were temperature-controlled
to 47 ± 2 °C, chosen to lower the viscosity of the fluorinated
ILs. This resulted in a better-quality, uniform liquid film on the
surface of each of the carousel wheels.
Molecular Dynamics
MD simulations of the ILs were performed
in GROMACS 5.1.2 using the CL&P extensions[57,85−90] to the OPLS-AA force field.[91−98] Additional parameters describing the intramolecular interactions
around the CH2–CH2 linker unit in [C8mimF13]+ were used,[85,90] along with the perfluoroalkyl parameters developed by Watkins and
Jorgenson.[98] Simulations were performed
for multiple compositions in the C8 system and at x = 0 and x = 0.25 for the C4, C6, and C12 systems.
The majority of the simulations used 800 ion pairs; an additional
two liquids, pure [C8mimF13][Tf2N],
and a [C8mim]0.5[C8mimF13] 0.5[Tf2N] mixture were simulated using 1600
ion pairs to establish if the simulated interface was affected by
the finite system size. A detailed description of the procedure for
each simulation is given in Supporting Information 2.1 and is summarized briefly here.The first step was
the simulation of the bulk liquid. Ions, in a single conformation
of each type, were randomly packed into a cubic box with length 7–9
nm. Following a steepest-descent energy minimization, each liquid
was simulated under NPT conditions for typically
∼0.5 ns using a Berendsen barostat (1 bar) and velocity-rescaling
thermostat at 500 K. Subsequently, the system was typically propagated
for 4 ns using a Parrinello–Rahman barostat (1 bar) and a velocity-rescaling
thermostat at 320 K, the temperature of the RAS-LIF experiments in
this work. The simulated densities are given in Supporting Information 2.1; they systematically overestimated
the measured bulk density of the liquids by <6%, which is not unexpected
for the force field used.[90]The final
frame from the bulk runs was extended in the z-dimension
by a factor of three. This allowed for the simulation
of a slab, typically 8–10 nm thick, with two vacuum interfaces,
while still using 3D periodic boundary conditions. Under NVT conditions, repeated cycles of 5 ns at 320 K, followed by 5 ns at
500 K were used to equilibrate the slab out to ∼80 ns, when
a final 10 ns at 320 K was run. Typically, MD trajectories were therefore
run for 90 ns overall, with results generally being reported here,
for reasons described below, from averages over the final ∼45
ns excluding the 500 K annealing cycles.A solvent-accessible
surface-area (ASA) algorithm,[99] which is
implemented as part of GROMACS, was used to determine
the areas of each atom type exposed at the liquid surface (at both
interfaces). Extensive characterizations were carried out for different
unique atom types, including different positions along the side chains.
Of particular interest were the secondary H atoms because they are
known to be the principal source of OH in the RAS-LIF experiments,
as discussed further below.[50] Thorough
exploratory analyses confirmed that a probe particle radius of 0.15
nm, close to the accepted van der Waals radius for O atoms,[100] was sufficient to prevent any significant unwanted
contributions from voids within the bulk liquid. Counting of atoms
whose exposed area exceeded a selected threshold level was also explored
as explained in Supporting Information 2.2. It was used in some preliminary tests of equilibration and convergence,
but was found to be prone to artifacts for quantitative comparison
of different atom types. The principal results reported here are therefore
the summed exposed areas of atoms of a given type, normalized as appropriate
to the total exposed surface area for a given liquid as explained
below.The ASA analysis was carried out for selected frames
in the relevant
MD trajectory. To account for the (artificially, on account of the
classical force fields)[101] slow MD dynamics
of the IL surface relative to the simulation time step, a block analysis[102] (see Supporting Information 2.3) was used to determine the effective relaxation time of
the surface. For several of the simulated liquids, the average surface
relaxation time of the secondary H-atom count was found to be ∼0.4
ns. Therefore, the trajectories were sampled every 0.4 ns to produce
broadly uncorrelated frames, with the average and standard error calculated
in the conventional way. This resulted in a minimum of 17 ns of simulation
time (42 frames) for each liquid from which the average surface-accessible
area of selected atom types was calculated.System size effects
were investigated by comparing the 1600 and
800 ion-pair systems for [C8mim][C8mimF13](1–[NTf2] with x = 0 and x = 0.5. The general structure of the interfaces was very
similar, other than some weak density oscillations which reached the
middle of the slab for the 800 ion-pair systems but not for those
with 1600 ion pairs (see Supporting Information 2.4). The results for the areal density of surface hydrogen
atoms for different system sizes also agreed within their respective
errors (see Supporting Information 2.5).The surface-hydrogen density for each liquid was monitored as the
simulation progressed; this was the basis for selecting only the final
∼45 ns of each trajectory for further analysis because by this
time, results for a wide range of liquids no longer varied within
a small tolerance (see Supporting Information 2.5).
Results
The STs of the pure components of the
[C8mim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N]
system have been reported previously;[55,103] for the mixtures,
the new measurements here are shown in Figure a (values are tabulated in Supporting Information 3.1.). As x increases,
it is clear that the ST decreases to a greater extent than would be
expected from a simple linear-mixing model based on the bulk mole
fractions of the two ILs (eq )where σ1 and σ2 are the STs of the pure components (1 refers
to alkyl and
2 to fluoroalkyl) and σ is the
measured ST of the mixture. This relationship is indicated by the
dashed line in Figure a.
Figure 3
(a) ST data for [C8mim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N] mixtures. The dashed line illustrates a linear-mixing
model (eq ). (b) Excess
ST, the difference between ideal and observed behavior, which is negative
here. All errors are 95% CL; derived from the repeatability of the
measurements and not the accuracy of the instrument, which is a much
smaller source of error.
(a) ST data for [C8mim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N] mixtures. The dashed line illustrates a linear-mixing
model (eq ). (b) Excess
ST, the difference between ideal and observed behavior, which is negative
here. All errors are 95% CL; derived from the repeatability of the
measurements and not the accuracy of the instrument, which is a much
smaller source of error.Figure b illustrates
the deviation from the linear-mixing model by plotting the excess
ST (difference between the ST of the mixture and that predicted from
linear mixing) for each composition. The largest deviation in the
surface excess, which is negative here, occurs in the composition
range between x = 0.2 and 0.4.For the purposes
of comparison with the RAS-LIF data and MD simulation
to follow, we can invert the logic of eq to assert that the observed ST is a linear combination
of the STs of the pure liquids weighted by the surface mole fractions of the fluoro (denoted xs) and alkyl (1 – xs) components,
respectively, that isNote that this is an implicit equation for the unknown surface
mole fractions in terms of the measured ST at a known bulk composition, x, and is equivalent toA similar model (other than
being expressed in terms of volume
rather than mole fractions, which will be similar here) gives a reasonable
fit to measured ST data for mixtures of long- and short-chain alkyl
ILs.[55] As discussed in this previous work,
the best-fit value of an adjustable weighting parameter allowing for
higher-order cross terms was close to zero.The resulting values
of (1 – xs) (i.e., the implied
fraction of the alkyl component at the surface)
from eqs and 2b are included as a function of the bulk composition, x, in Figure . They show the expected strong negative deviation from the linearity
that would have been predicted by eq (dashed line) (the other data with which they are
compared are introduced below.)
Figure 4
Comparable relative measures of surface
exposure of the alkyl component
in [Cmim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N] mixtures. ST = alkyl surface mole fraction (1 – xs) as defined through eqs and 2b for C8 mixtures
only (green circles). RAS-LIF = normalized reactivity to produce OH
as defined in eq (red
circles C12 mixtures; black squares C8 mixtures; blue triangles C6
mixtures; and magenta triangles C4 mixtures). MD-ASA = relative fraction
of the surface area consisting of reactive secondary-hydrogen atoms
for C8 mixtures only (yellow diamonds). The dashed line is the prediction
for linear mixing in all cases. All experimental error bars 95% CL.
A representative x-error bar, reflecting the precision
of preparing the mixtures, is shown for x = 0.82.
The confidence limits for the MD ASA analyses correspond to different
assumptions about the alkyl chain positions which contribute, as described
in the text, which makes only marginal differences here.
Comparable relative measures of surface
exposure of the alkyl component
in [Cmim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N] mixtures. ST = alkyl surface mole fraction (1 – xs) as defined through eqs and 2b for C8 mixtures
only (green circles). RAS-LIF = normalized reactivity to produce OH
as defined in eq (red
circles C12 mixtures; black squares C8 mixtures; blue triangles C6
mixtures; and magenta triangles C4 mixtures). MD-ASA = relative fraction
of the surface area consisting of reactive secondary-hydrogen atoms
for C8 mixtures only (yellow diamonds). The dashed line is the prediction
for linear mixing in all cases. All experimental error bars 95% CL.
A representative x-error bar, reflecting the precision
of preparing the mixtures, is shown for x = 0.82.
The confidence limits for the MD ASA analyses correspond to different
assumptions about the alkyl chain positions which contribute, as described
in the text, which makes only marginal differences here.Figure shows, as a representative example, the detected OH density
from the [C12mim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N] system of mixtures as a function of delay between the photolysis
and probe laser pulses. Similar data for [C8mim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N] mixtures have been reported previously[55] and those for the C4 and C6 mixtures are given
in Supporting Information 4.1. These OH
appearance profiles are normalized to the peak of the corresponding
profile from squalane. The squalane reference data were recorded immediately
after those from each mixture of interest. Typically, 10 such individual
relative measurements were made for each mixture and averaged. This
approach reduced the effect of unavoidable minor variations in the
experimental conditions that affect the magnitude of the LIF signal,
providing a precise, consistent measurement relative to the reference
liquid. An additional profile was measured for a commercial sample
of pure [C12mim][Tf2N] (i.e., x = 0). This gave essentially identical results to the sample synthesized
in-house, used to make the mixtures for other values of x.
Figure 5
OH appearance profiles (OH density as a function of photolysis-probe
delay) from [C12mim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N] for varying x, as shown. Signals are normalized
to those from the squalane reference liquid. aMeasurement
of commercial sample, confirming reproducibility of data. Error bars
are 95% CL.
OH appearance profiles (OH density as a function of photolysis-probe
delay) from [C12mim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N] for varying x, as shown. Signals are normalized
to those from the squalane reference liquid. aMeasurement
of commercial sample, confirming reproducibility of data. Error bars
are 95% CL.The OH rotational distribution
was also determined for x = 0 and 0.5 by taking the
LIF excitation spectrum (LIF
intensity as a function of probe laser wavelength) with the photolysis-probe
delay fixed at the peak of the OH appearance profile. It was found
not to change significantly with x (see Supporting Information 5.1 and 5.2). This simplifies
the interpretation of Figure in that variations in the OH signal are related directly
to an increase in total OH density, and by inference, the surface
alkyl chain exposure of the methylene units and not due to a redistribution
of OH rotational populations. This assumption has been verified previously.[50] The same assumption was made for the C4 and
C6 chain length mixtures, where rotational distributions were not
recorded due to the lower signal levels.The appearance profiles
in Figure all have
essentially the same peak arrival time (other
than for x = 1.00, for which there is effectively
no real signal—see below), implying that the most-probable
scattered OH velocity is the same for all liquid mixtures. Therefore,
a density-to-flux transformation was not required and the OH densities
in Figure can straightforwardly
be integrated between fixed limits to yield a single value representative
of the OH yield from each mixture (see Supporting Information 6.1–6.4); we term these integrated values
the relative reactivity with respect to squalane.Figure summarizes the RAS-LIF relative reactivities, normalized
to squalane, for all chain lengths and compositions studied. Some
observations and trends are immediately clear.
Figure 6
(a) RAS-LIF reactivity
relative to squalane for the neat liquids
and for [Cmim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N] mixtures, with chain lengths n as shown. The dashed lines show the behavior expected from a linear
mixing law for C8 (black dashed line) and C12 (red dashed line). (b)
Excess reactivity, which is the difference (not renormalized) between
the reactivity of a mixture and the linear mixing prediction. All
errors bars are 95% CL. A representative x-error
bar, reflecting the precision of preparing the mixtures, is shown
for x = 0.82.
(a) RAS-LIF reactivity
relative to squalane for the neat liquids
and for [Cmim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N] mixtures, with chain lengths n as shown. The dashed lines show the behavior expected from a linear
mixing law for C8 (black dashed line) and C12 (red dashed line). (b)
Excess reactivity, which is the difference (not renormalized) between
the reactivity of a mixture and the linear mixing prediction. All
errors bars are 95% CL. A representative x-error
bar, reflecting the precision of preparing the mixtures, is shown
for x = 0.82.First, for x = 1, the reactivity is effectively
zero; that is, no measurable OH is detected. This implies that, in
addition to the well-established absence of reactivity of the imidazolium-ring
H atoms,[32,47,48,50,53] the −CH2CH2– linker in [C8mimF13][Tf2N] is not amenable to H-abstraction by O(3P). We return to the relative contributions of different C–H
bond types below.Second, for all mixtures, as x increases there
is a decrease in reactivity larger than that expected from stoichiometry
for linear mixing, which is indicated by the dashed lines for C12
(red) and C8 (black) in Figure a. This implies that [Cmim]+ ions are statistically underrepresented relative to their
bulk composition at the surface for all n. The corresponding
(negative) excesses in relative reactivity are shown in Figure b.Third, by comparing
the reactivities of the C8 and C12 mixtures,
there is a larger absolute deviation from linear
mixing for C12 than for C8; that is, as the alkyl chain length increases,
a larger number of reactive sites are displaced from the surface by
a given mole fraction of semiperfluorinated chains. However, the absolute
OH yield for the pure C12 liquid is already known to be larger than
that for the pure C8 (as confirmed by the behavior at x = 0 in Figure a).[50] This can be taken into account by normalizing
the reactivity of each mixture to the reactivity of the corresponding
pure liquid at x = 0 via eqNote that this produces a relative
measure of the fraction of the
alkyl component at the surface formally equivalent to eq , but directly in terms of the measured
OH yield from the alkyl component for which no further assumption
of linearity is required (because the OH yield from the fluoro component
is effectively zero).The normalized reactivities are included
in Figure as a function
of x for
different chain lengths. Interestingly, the reactivities for C8 and
C12 are nearly identical across the whole range in x when expressed in this relative form. The more restricted RAS-LIF
measurements for C6 and C4 at a mixing ratio of x = 0.25 also suggest essentially the same relative reduction in reactivity
as a proportion of that in the pure liquid on introduction of [C8mimF13]+ ions. Moreover, the agreement
with the surface composition based on the ST data as derived via eqs and 2b for C8 mixtures is rather good. We return to this in the Discussion below.The variations with n for the pure liquids (x = 0) and the x = 0.25 mixtures are presented
in an alternative form in Figure . For the purposes of further comparison with the MD
simulations (see below), the RAS-LIF reactivities have been renormalized
in Figure a to the
result for pure [C12mim][Tf2N] (i.e., x = 0 for n = 12). All the other RAS-LIF
measurements retain their correct relative values directly from the
experiment. For the pure alkyl liquids, the strong increase in alkyl
chain exposure with the increase in n, already well
known from previous work,[48,50] is reproduced here.
Because the point at which any of the MD simulations is normalized
to the RAS-LIF measurements is arbitrary, we show a second choice
in Figure b in which
this is done for the x = 0.25 mixture for n = 12, to which we will return below.
Figure 7
(a) Relative reactivities
from either RAS-LIF (OH signals, blue)
or MD ASA (proportion of the exposed surface covered by secondary
hydrogen, black) for pure alkyl liquids (x = 0, squares,
solid lines) or [C8mim]0.75[C8mimF13]0.25[Tf2N] mixtures (x = 0.25, circles, dashed lines), as a function of alkyl chain length, n. Both RAS-LIF and MD ASA results have been normalized
to those for pure C12 (i.e., x = 0, n = 12). (b) RAS-LIF and MD ASA results [symbols and lines as in (a)]
for the same x = 0.25 mixtures renormalized at x = 0.25, n = 12. (c) Ratio of reactivity
for x = 0.25 to x = 0 for RAS-LIF
(blue) and ASA-MD (black). All experimental errors are 95% CL. The
confidence limits for the ASA-MD analyses correspond to different
assumptions about the alkyl chain positions which contribute, as described
in the text. Note that these largely cancel in (c) because the effects
of this assumption on x = 0.25 and x = 0 are correlated.
(a) Relative reactivities
from either RAS-LIF (OH signals, blue)
or MD ASA (proportion of the exposed surface covered by secondary
hydrogen, black) for pure alkyl liquids (x = 0, squares,
solid lines) or [C8mim]0.75[C8mimF13]0.25[Tf2N] mixtures (x = 0.25, circles, dashed lines), as a function of alkyl chain length, n. Both RAS-LIF and MD ASA results have been normalized
to those for pure C12 (i.e., x = 0, n = 12). (b) RAS-LIF and MD ASA results [symbols and lines as in (a)]
for the same x = 0.25 mixtures renormalized at x = 0.25, n = 12. (c) Ratio of reactivity
for x = 0.25 to x = 0 for RAS-LIF
(blue) and ASA-MD (black). All experimental errors are 95% CL. The
confidence limits for the ASA-MD analyses correspond to different
assumptions about the alkyl chain positions which contribute, as described
in the text. Note that these largely cancel in (c) because the effects
of this assumption on x = 0.25 and x = 0 are correlated.The significant absolute
reductions in alkyl-chain exposure between x = 0
and x = 0.25 for all n are apparent
in Figure a. The proportional decreases between x = 0 and x = 0.25 are independent of any
choice of normalization in either the measurements or the simulations.
They are plotted in Figure c, where it is obvious that the RAS-LIF reactivities for the x = 0.25 mixtures are essentially a constant proportion,
of around ∼35%, of those for the pure alkyl liquids.
MD Simulations
We present first some selected snapshots
at fixed points along MD trajectories to give a qualitative visual
sense of the results of the MD simulations. These are generally the
final frames of a given simulation run but are representative of typical,
fully equilibrated samples, as established in the Methods section above and demonstrated in detail in Supporting Information 2.4 and 2.5). A common
color coding is used throughout, selected to highlight the distinction
between the charged regions made up of cationic headgroups and [Tf2N]− anions (both shown in red) and the two
potentially distinct nonpolar regions consisting of regular alkyl
chains (gray) or fluoroalkyl chains (cyan), as also illustrated in Figure . For reasons introduced
above and developed below, the first two members of all the alkyl
chains and the −CH2CH2– linker
in [C8mimF13]+ are color-coded as
part of their respective headgroups.
Figure 8
Color scheme used for the MD snapshots
in Figures –12. (a) [Cmim]+ (in this case n = 8), (b) [C8mimF13]+, and (c)
[Tf2N]−. For each species, the lower
structure is a space-filling representation (as used in later figures)
defined by van der Waals radii. The fluoroalkyl chains on the cation
(C3–C8) are colored cyan, the equivalent chains on the alkyl
cation are colored gray, and all other atoms are colored red. To ease
rapid identification, the corresponding ball-and-stick representations
are shown above in the same orientation and on the same scale. The
same color scheme is used, with atom types (other than C, implied
for unlabeled atoms) labeled explicitly.
Color scheme used for the MD snapshots
in Figures –12. (a) [Cmim]+ (in this case n = 8), (b) [C8mimF13]+, and (c)
[Tf2N]−. For each species, the lower
structure is a space-filling representation (as used in later figures)
defined by van der Waals radii. The fluoroalkyl chains on the cation
(C3–C8) are colored cyan, the equivalent chains on the alkyl
cation are colored gray, and all other atoms are colored red. To ease
rapid identification, the corresponding ball-and-stick representations
are shown above in the same orientation and on the same scale. The
same color scheme is used, with atom types (other than C, implied
for unlabeled atoms) labeled explicitly.
Figure 9
Top-down view of representative single MD snapshots
of [C8mim](1– [C8mimF13] [Tf2N] mixtures; x as indicated. Color scheme as in Figure .
Figure 12
Side view of representative single MD snapshots of pure [Cmim][Tf2N] (upper row) and [C8mim]0.75 [C8mimF13]0.25 [Tf2N] mixtures (lower row) for n =
4, 6, 8, and 12. Color scheme as in Figure .
The variation in appearance with mole fraction, x, in [C8mim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N] mixtures is shown in Figures (top-down view) and 10 (side
view). For this alkyl chain length, the surface is heavily populated
by nonpolar cation chains throughout the full range of x, with a clear sublayer (Figure ) composed almost entirely of polar headgroups and
anions. Fluoroalkyl chains progressively displace alkyl chains from
the surface layer as x increases. It is obvious even
by qualitative inspection that the fluoroalkyl chains have a higher
surface preference than the alkyl chains, with, for example, considerably
more than half of the exposed chains being fluoroalkyl in the x = 0.5 frame.
Figure 10
Side view of representative single MD snapshots of [C8mim](1– [C8mimF13] [Tf2N] mixtures; x as indicated. Color scheme as in Figure .
Top-down view of representative single MD snapshots
of [C8mim](1– [C8mimF13] [Tf2N] mixtures; x as indicated. Color scheme as in Figure .Side view of representative single MD snapshots of [C8mim](1– [C8mimF13] [Tf2N] mixtures; x as indicated. Color scheme as in Figure .The corresponding trends with chain length in the [Cmim] cation are shown in Figure (top-down view) and 12 (side view). In
each case, the pure [Cmim][Tf2N] material (i.e., x = 0, upper rows) is compared
with the [Cmim]0.75[C8mimF13]0.25[Tf2N] mixture
(lower rows). As expected from previous work on the pure alkyl liquids,
the development of the alkyl-dominated surface layer increases significantly
with n.[32,50] On the introduction
of [C8mimF13] at a mole fraction of 0.25, an
overlayer is formed for all n; fluoroalkyl chains
are its dominant component for n ≤ 8 but a
visibly larger area is covered by alkyl chains for n = 12.
Figure 11
Top-down view of representative single MD snapshots of pure [Cmim][Tf2N] (upper row) and [C8mim]0.75 [C8mimF13]0.25 [Tf2N] mixtures (lower row) for n =
4, 6, 8, and 12. Color scheme as in Figure .
Top-down view of representative single MD snapshots of pure [Cmim][Tf2N] (upper row) and [C8mim]0.75 [C8mimF13]0.25 [Tf2N] mixtures (lower row) for n =
4, 6, 8, and 12. Color scheme as in Figure .At a more quantitative level, the ASA analysis can be used to assess
the degree of abstractable hydrogen-atom exposure on different surfaces.
The results, expressed as fractions (see below), are included in Figures (for C8 only) and 7 (all n), where they are compared
with the corresponding measures from the RAS-LIF and (more limited)
ST data. To carry out this analysis, a choice was necessary about
which H-atom types to designate as abstractable. As noted above, we
have concluded previously that, due to the only modestly superthermal
O-atom translational energy distribution from NO2 photolysis,[83] the H-abstraction is effectively highly selective
toward the methylene units on the alkyl chain of the imidazolium cation.[48,50] On the basis of relative reactivities of related small molecules
in the gas phase, confirmed in experiments on related isotopically
labeled self-assembled monolayer surfaces,[104,105] the terminal methyl group is thought to show almost negligible reactivity
despite its undoubtedly higher exposure, consistent with its significantly
higher C–H bond energy.[84,106] There is a further
important technical uncertainty about the intrinsic reactivities (independent
of exposure) of different methylene positions along the alkyl chain
in these ILs. We return to this question in the Discussion below, but for the moment, use the error bars in Figures and 7 to indicate the range of results obtained by assuming that the H
atoms on either the first two, one, or none of the C atoms nearest
the ring in the alkyl chain are excluded from the calculation of accessible
reactive secondary hydrogen.The MD-derived quantities in Figures and 7 represent fractions
of the total area of a given surface covered by the accessible reactive
secondary-hydrogen atoms and are hence comparable to the other quantities
plotted there (This is the appropriate measure because the total probability
of those probe O atoms that are directed toward the surface suffering
a collision remains at unity, regardless of changes in the surface
morphology). The predicted absolute surface area of all atom types
per unit geometric area of the slab were found to depend on the liquid.
They increased slightly with the increase in fluoro content in the
[C8mim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N]
mixtures (around 10% from x = 0 to 1), somewhat more
significantly with the alkyl chain length in the pure alkyl liquids
(around 19% from n = 4 to 12), but only more modestly
with chain length in the x = 0.25 mixtures (around
4%). Full details are given in Supporting Information 2.6.Figure shows the
MD results for [C8mim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N] mixtures, normalized (as in eq ) to pure [C8mim][Tf2N]. They
show the same qualitative behavior as the RAS-LIF and ST data, with
negative deviations of the secondary-hydrogen exposure from linearity
ideality. However, they tend to underestimate either of the experimentally
observed deviations for low-x mixtures. There is
closer correspondence when x ≥ 0.5.The variations in secondary-hydrogen exposure with n for x = 0 and the x = 0.25 mixtures
are shown in Figure . As noted above, there is an (unknown) overall scaling factor relative
to the RAS-LIF measurements, so, for the purposes of the comparison
in Figure a, the MD
results have also been normalized to that for pure [C12mim][Tf2N]. Once again, there is a qualitative agreement
with the RAS-LIF results that for all chain lengths, the introduction
of 25% [C8mimF13]+ ions leads to
a substantial reduction in the alkyl-chain exposure. However, there
is a quantitative disagreement about the extent of this reduction
and its variation with n. This depends on, but is
not outweighed by, the assumption of which positions in the alkyl
chain are included in the ASA analysis. The apparent agreement between
RAS-LIF and MD is somewhat better if the x = 0.25
results are considered alone, and the renormalization to experiment
is carried out for the n = 12 mixture, as shown in Figure b. The qualitatively
different degrees of dependence of the ratio of x = 0.25 to x = 0 on n, which we
emphasize do not depend on any choice of normalization, are highlighted
in Figure c; as noted
above, in the RAS-LIF measurements, this ratio is essentially independent
of n at around 35%, whereas from the MD ASA analysis,
it is in approximate agreement with this for n =
4, but increases roughly linearly with n. By n = 12, the ratio is close to 0.75, which is the stoichiometric
result for a mixture containing 25% fluoroalkyl and 75% alkyl chains.
Note that an alternative way of expressing this is that the MD results
for different n would not fall on a single curve
in the construction of Figure , unlike the RAS-LIF data (We have only shown the n = 8 MD data there to avoid clutter.)
Discussion
The ST measurements, RAS-LIF observations and MD simulations are
all in qualitative agreement that fluoroalkyl chains occupy the surface
preferentially in mixtures of [C8mimF13] [Tf2N] and [Cmim][Tf2N],
at least for n ≤ 8. This conclusion follows
naturally from the following observations: (i) the negative deviations
from linearity in the STs (Figures and 4), given that [C8mimF13] [Tf2N] has a lower ST than [C8mim][Tf2N]; (ii) the deficits in alkyl-chain exposure
relative to linearity observed by RAS-LIF for mixtures of all alkyl
chain lengths (Figures and 5), most straightforwardly interpreted
as a complementary implicit preference for fluoroalkyl chains; and
(iii) the corresponding deficits in the fractions of the surface covered
by abstractable secondary hydrogen atoms predicted in the MD simulations
(Figures and 7) for chain lengths n ≤
8.At this qualitative level, our results reinforce previous
observations
of a generally stronger surface preference for fluoroalkyl chains
over alkyl chains.[78−81] The conformity to the “universal” functional form
of the deviation from ideality for other types of IL mixtures noted
previously for [Cmim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N] mixtures with n = 8 is also
now shown here to extend at least to n = 12.[55]However, there are significant quantitative
discrepancies between
the ASA analyses of the MD simulations and either our RAS-LIF or ST
results, which appear in good agreement with one another where we
have data for both (n = 8). There are three main
aspects:MD ASA predicts a weaker dependence
on chain length, n, than RAS-LIF for the pure alkyl
liquids (Figure a).MD ASA does not reproduce
quantitatively
how the ratio of abstractable hydrogen exposure varies with n in x = 0.25 mixtures (Figure c) according to RAS-LIF.MD ASA also does not reproduce
quantitatively
the effects of introducing [C8mimF13][Tf2N] at different ratios in [C8mim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N] mixtures (Figure ), found either by RAS-LIF (spanning n) or ST (n = 8).Discrepancy (A) has been noted previously.[50] Discrepancies (B) and (C) are connected and are among the
principal
additional new observations here. MD ASA appears to support the proposition
that longer alkyl chains should compete better with fluorinated chains
for surface sites. However, although this may be expected intuitively
based on the intrinsically higher surface presence for longer chains
in the pure alkyl ILs, it is not borne out in the RAS-LIF experiments
here.The source of discrepancies (A–C) could lie within
one,
or a combination, of three possibilities:There is some undetected
artifact
in the RAS-LIF experiments.The MD simulations do not give a physically
accurate description of the liquid surfaces.The results of the ASA analysis are
not directly comparable with what is measured in the RAS-LIF or ST
experiments.We have no good reason to
suspect explanation (1). Note that the
discrepancies are obvious even in the raw data; for example, for discrepancy
(B), the x = 0.25 curve in Figure would have to be more than a factor of 2
or larger for it to agree with the MD ASA prediction for the x = 0.25/x = 0 ratio. Similar raw data
illustrating the other discrepancies are given in Supporting Information 4.1 or in previous publications.[50,55] None of the discrepancies can, therefore, be a consequence of the
way the data are processed to produce relative reactivities and are
far beyond the level of statistical uncertainty in the RAS-LIF measurements.Surface-active contaminants have been found to be a potentially
significant issue in related surface-specific experiments on ILs.[107−111] However, we see no evidence of irreproducibility or irregular trends
in the RAS-LIF results; the variations with mixing ratio and with
alkyl chain length are all regular and monotonic. The ST data also
support the RAS-LIF results for n = 8 mixtures. We
have, of course, used only one source of fluoro-labeled [C8mimF13] [Tf2N], which could conceivably be
the source of discrepancies (B) and (C). However, note that (A) only
concerns the n-dependence of the RAS-LIF OH yield
from the pure alkyl liquids, for which effectively indistinguishable
results are obtained here and previously using independent sources
of [Cmim] [Tf2N].[48,50]There is also nothing obvious within the MD simulations themselves
to suggest (A–C) can be explained by (2). As described in Supporting Information 2.3–2.5, we are
confident that the MD trajectories are fully equilibrated and that
the sampling interval is long enough that the snapshots analyzed are
uncorrelated. Doubling the number of ion pairs to make slabs which
are twice as thick has only minor, predictable effects (see Supporting Information 2.4 and 2.5). Statistical
errors based on the variation of ASA results between snapshots are
small, even for individual positions on alkyl chains, and much smaller
(typically only a few percent) when summed over all secondary hydrogen
atoms.As further reassurance, the representative snapshots
in Figures and 12 (and see also Supporting Information 2.4 for selected 1600-ion-pair systems) show the expected development
of interpenetrating alkyl and polar domains in the bulk and increased
alkyl coverage of the surface with the increase in chain length that
have already been well-characterized for the parent, nonfluorinated
ILs.[32] For the [C8mim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N] mixtures in Figures and 10, the structures
are similar except for the visual appearance of two distinct polar
domains (alkyl and fluoroalkyl) for intermediate x.Side view of representative single MD snapshots of pure [Cmim][Tf2N] (upper row) and [C8mim]0.75 [C8mimF13]0.25 [Tf2N] mixtures (lower row) for n =
4, 6, 8, and 12. Color scheme as in Figure .The disproportionate occupancy of the surface by semiperfluorinated
chains is also qualitatively obvious. The nature of these surface
layers can be examined more quantitatively by constructing z-density profiles (i.e., number density of different atom
types in the direction normal to the surface, suitably averaged over
both faces of the slab for sufficient length of a trajectory). As
an illustrative example of some of the key features, Figure shows the profiles for the terminal methyl carbons
(atom-types CT or CT-F, respectively, for alkyl or fluoroalkyl chains)
and ring N-atom (atom-types N and N–F, respectively) to which
the chains were attached for x = 0 and x = 0.5 of [C8mim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N]. The larger, 1600-ion-pair system is illustrated because
it is not subject to minor, undamped oscillations that remain perceptible
in the middle of the thinner slabs with 800 ion pairs (see Supporting Information 2.4). The corresponding
representative snapshots (final frames of the production runs) are
also included for completeness in Supporting Information 2.4.
Figure 13
Number density as a function of z for
the 1600-ion-pair
system with x = 0 (upper panel) and x = 0.5 (lower panel) in the [C8mim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N] mixture system at 320 K. The densities of
the same atom types for the [C8mim]+ and [C8mimF13]+ cations are plotted: CT (or
CT-F), the terminal carbon atom on the alkyl (or fluoroalkyl) chain
and N (or N–F), the ring nitrogen to which the alkyl (or fluoroalkyl)
chain is attached. The z = 0 position was defined
by the center of mass of the slab. Bin widths were ∼0.09 nm,
corresponding to 500 slices along the z-axis. Averaging
is over the equilibrated periods of the MD trajectory, beginning 1
ns (to allow the surface to relax from the previous 500 K heating
cycle) into each of the 320 K simulation blocks from 30 to 95 ns.
Number density as a function of z for
the 1600-ion-pair
system with x = 0 (upper panel) and x = 0.5 (lower panel) in the [C8mim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N] mixture system at 320 K. The densities of
the same atom types for the [C8mim]+ and [C8mimF13]+ cations are plotted: CT (or
CT-F), the terminal carbon atom on the alkyl (or fluoroalkyl) chain
and N (or N–F), the ring nitrogen to which the alkyl (or fluoroalkyl)
chain is attached. The z = 0 position was defined
by the center of mass of the slab. Bin widths were ∼0.09 nm,
corresponding to 500 slices along the z-axis. Averaging
is over the equilibrated periods of the MD trajectory, beginning 1
ns (to allow the surface to relax from the previous 500 K heating
cycle) into each of the 320 K simulation blocks from 30 to 95 ns.For x = 0, the outer edge of the
interface is
enriched with CT atoms. The N-atoms occupy a distinct, polar underlayer
depleted in alkyl chains, consistent with previous simulations and
experimental studies.[32,50,55,112] There is also the suggestion of a weak,
second nonpolar layer around z ∼ 6 nm; the
depth at which this layer forms, combined with the weak inner shoulder
on the N-atom profile, suggest that these are alkyl chains which tend
to point inward toward the center of the slab from headgroups in the
polar layer. This is confirmed by visual inspection of individual
snapshots (see, e.g., the relevant panels of Figure or 12). Such multilayer
ordering is consistent with independent MD simulations, confirmed
by X-ray scattering and SFG measurements, on related systems.[113−116]For x = 0.5, there is a clear enrichment
of [C8mimF13]+ ions at the expense
of [C8mim]+ ions in the outermost layer, as
indicated
by the corresponding CT-F and CT number densities. The fluoro chains
are enriched by a factor of ∼2 relative to their bulk density,
whereas the alkyl chains, although still a very clear local maximum,
are slightly under-represented relative to the bulk. The immediate
polar underlayer is dominated by N–F over N atoms in roughly
the same proportions (as required by molecular connectivity). Interestingly,
there is a weaker but still obvious secondary polar layer, which is
dominated by N over N–F atoms (which are depleted in this region
relative to the bulk). Correspondingly, the secondary polar layer
at z ∼ 6 nm, which is more pronounced than
for x = 0, contains an excess of CT over CT-F atoms.
The breadth of this secondary CT peak suggests that although predominantly
inward-pointing, the alkyl chains adopt a wide range of orientations.
This is also plausible based on simulations of related systems.[116]In this absence of any obvious anomalies
and barring any undetected
errors in the way the MD simulations have been carried out, one remaining
possibility within explanation (2) is that the nonpolarizable OPLS-AA/CL&P
force fields do not give an accurate representation of the surfaces
of these mixed alkyl/fluoro systems. The developers of the OPLS-AA/CL&P
framework have recently described its extension to include explicit
polarizability using an approach based on Drude dipoles (also known
as a “core–shell” model); they have demonstrated
its application to the bulk structures of selected ILs.[82,101] The most significant effects, however, are on ion mobility, producing
viscosities and diffusion coefficients in much better agreement with
the experiment than classical MD; effects on the structure are more
modest. Application to IL surface structures has been very limited
so far and is confined to our own treatment of the surface of [C4mim][Tf2N].[56] As such,
it is not possible to say whether it would significantly alter the
surface structures in the more complex alkyl/fluoroalkyl systems here.
We simply note, however, that we found very good agreement between
RAS-LIF measurements and classical, nonpolarizable MD systems for
the surface occupancy of short and long chains in [C2mim]1–[C12mim][Tf2N] mixtures.[32]Our final alternative, explanation (3), concerns the relationship
between the results of the ASA analysis of the (now assumed to be
physically correct) MD simulations and OH yields in RAS-LIF experiments
(now assumed to be free from systematic errors). These two measures
are obviously designed to be related, but a priori, they are certainly
not identical. Hence, in that sense, differences between RAS-LIF and
ASA are not necessarily surprising. However, that is not to say that
those differences which can be identified necessarily provide a self-consistent
explanation for the observed discrepancies in the results. We consider
here two principal aspects: (3)(a) that the OH yield will depend on
energetic factors (differential reactivity of different C–H
bond types) absent from MD ASA; and (3)(b) that OH yields will separately
depend on stereodynamical factors, including impact factors and angles
of approach, clearly neglected in a simple ASA analysis.Considering
the energetic factor (3)(a) first, we have been assuming,
as explained above, that the observed OH yield has a negligible contribution
from the CH3 terminus of the alkyl chains. Although we
know this to be a reasonable approximation, based on our previous
related work,[50,84,104−106] it might not be completely reliable. The
situation is exacerbated by the relatively large contribution that
the terminal CH3 group makes to the surface coverage, at
least as predicted by MD ASA. This is illustrated in Figure a, which shows the fraction
of the total surface area occupied by the H atoms at each site in
the alkyl chain for the pure [Cmim][Tf2N] liquids for n = 4–12. Interestingly,
when presented in this form, the fraction of the surface covered by
terminal methyl groups is almost independent of chain length. However,
as noted above, the total area also increases by ∼19% from n = 4 to 12 (see Supporting Information 2.6 for full details) despite a significant absolute reduction
in anion exposure, reflecting the increased roughness of the surface
as it is dominated by longer alkyl chains. If the CH3 groups
were to be making a non-negligible contribution to the observed OH
yield and should therefore be included to some extent in the MD ASA
analysis, note that this would result in an even less steep variation
with n for the MD ASA results than is currently shown
in Figure a. The level
of this agreement between MD and RAS-LIF would therefore be even poorer.
We conclude that any potential CH3 reactivity does not
in itself provide a resolution of discrepancy (A). As we have noted
previously, it does help to rationalize the very significant differences
in the n-dependence of OH yields from pure alkyl
liquids between RAS-LIF using relatively low-energy O(3P) atoms from an NO2 photolytic source, as here, versus
those in related RAS-MS measurements using hyperthermal O(3P) atoms.[50]
Figure 14
(a) Fraction of the
total surface area (sum of all atom types)
occupied by the H atoms attached to each C atom in the alkyl chain
for pure [Cmim][Tf2N] liquids
for n = 4–12, as indicated. Chain positions
are numbered from the imidazolium ring. Note that the last member
of each chain is a methyl group. (b) Corresponding MD ASA fractional
areas for the same atom types in [Cmim]0.75[C8mimF13]0.25[Tf2N] mixtures. (c) Ratio of the fractional areas of the same
atom types in the mixtures, (b), to those in the pure liquids, (a).
(a) Fraction of the
total surface area (sum of all atom types)
occupied by the H atoms attached to each C atom in the alkyl chain
for pure [Cmim][Tf2N] liquids
for n = 4–12, as indicated. Chain positions
are numbered from the imidazolium ring. Note that the last member
of each chain is a methyl group. (b) Corresponding MD ASA fractional
areas for the same atom types in [Cmim]0.75[C8mimF13]0.25[Tf2N] mixtures. (c) Ratio of the fractional areas of the same
atom types in the mixtures, (b), to those in the pure liquids, (a).The issue of differential intrinsic reactivity
due to electronic
effects is not necessarily confined to differences between primary
and secondary H atoms. It is well known from, for example, ARXPS spectroscopy
that the electronic environment of the alkyl C atoms is significantly
affected by the charge on the imidazolium ring.[110] The C atoms connected directly to the ring [i.e., the methyl
group on N(3) and the first position on the alkyl chain attached to
N(1)] were nominally assigned by Lovelock et al. as part of the “ring”
(or “Chetero”) atoms on the basis of their
contribution to the corresponding peak in the XPS spectrum. The remaining
members of the alkyl chain form a distinct “Calkyl” peak, but the average splitting from the Chetero peak is only fully converged for n ≥ 8.These differences in the electronic environment may also be reflected
in higher C–H bond strengths, and correlated higher activation
energies for H abstraction for the methylene positions closer to the
ring. This is the source of the ambiguity we alluded to above (Results) about whether all the secondary H atoms
should be included for comparison with RAS-LIF experiments, or whether
some positions closest to the ring should be excluded. However, in
practice, this choice makes relatively little difference, as indicated
by the error bars in Figure a. The reason for this is now obvious from Figure a, which shows that the exposure
of the −CH2– units declines strongly in the
direction from the methyl terminus toward the ring. For most chain
lengths, it therefore makes little arithmetic difference whether one
or both of the first two positions nearest the ring are excluded from
the ASA. Naturally, the sensitivity to this choice is largest for n = 4. The agreement with the RAS-LIF results in Figure a is best, but still
systematically poor, when both of the first two positions are excluded.This may lend some weight to the proposal that electronic effects
suppress the reactivity of the −CH2– units
closest to the ring. We note that in the previous work, we saw essentially
no measurable OH signal from [C2mim] ILs, consistent with
the electronically suppressed reactivity of its sole −CH2– unit.[32,48,50] If so, the other −CH3 group attached to the ring
at N(3) would have its reactivity doubly suppressed below that of
a remote terminal −CH3 group. A conceivable resolution
of discrepancy (A) might be that the electronic suppression effect
propagates further along the chain than the first two positions. This
would obviously have most effect for the shorter chains for which
the relative discrepancy with the longest C12 chain is the largest.
It would be amplified if it extended to the terminus for the shorter
chains and that these terminal −CH3 groups make a non-negligible contribution to OH yield for the longer
chains. There would still have to be some suppression as far as n = 8 because as Figure a shows that the C8/C12 ratio is currently overpredicted.
This explanation admittedly remains very speculative, but would in
principle be testable through further experiments and supporting ab
initio calculations.A similar electronic effect due to adjacency
to the ring, potentially
further enhanced by the electron-withdrawing character of the remainder
of the fluorinated chain, would also suppress the reactivity of both
methylene groups in the −CH2CH2–
linker in [C8mimF13][Tf2N]. However,
it is not necessary to invoke this to explain the effective absence
of OH yield from pure [C8mimF13][Tf2N] (see Figure )
because the ASA analysis (see Supporting Information 2.6) implies that these positions are substantially less accessible
(by a factor of ∼3.5) than the already minimally exposed equivalent
positions in [C8mim][Tf2N] in Figure a. This is consistent with
established principles of increased volume and stiffness of fluoro
chains relative to their alkyl analogues.To assess whether
discrepancy (B) could be explained by differential
energetic effects, that is, 3(a), the fractional ASAs for each chain
position in the x = 0.25 mixtures are plotted in Figure b for comparison
with those for the pure alkyl liquids in Figure a. Because they must be consistent with Figure c, the fractional
areas occupied by the alkyl chains in the mixtures necessarily increase
with n in Figure b. What is also apparent, though, from closer inspection
of Figure a,b is
that other than the overall scaling factors, the variations with chain
position are of very similar shape for a given n.
This is confirmed explicitly in Figure c, which shows the x =
0.25/x = 0 ratio for the exposures of each chain
position for each n. For all chain lengths, the variation
with position along the chain is very modest (although interestingly
with a clearly systematic odd-even alternation for n = 12) and quite tightly distributed around the corresponding overall
ratios shown in Figure c. This is true also of the terminal methyl groups (which recall
do not contribute in Figure c). An important conclusion is that although differential
reactivities may well be substantial, it is not possible that they could explain discrepancy (B). Even changing the weighting
of different chain positions substantially in the ASA analysis would
not significantly alter the x = 0.25/x = 0 ratios. No amount of selective inclusion of only specific positions
for n = 6, 8, or 12 would deliver the constant ratio
of ∼0.35 seen for all chain lengths in the RAS-LIF measurements
(Figure c), which
can only be matched via MD ASA for n = 4.A
similar analysis (see Supporting Information 2.6) shows that the ratios of surface exposure for different
mixing ratios in [C8mim](1–[C8mimF13][Tf2N] mixtures is also only weakly dependent on the position
along the C8 alkyl chain. Although the x-dependence
of the deviations from RAS-LIF experiments in Figure are more subtle than those for the n-dependence in Figure c, we conclude that it is also unlikely that differential
reactivities, 3(a), could explain discrepancy (C).This leaves
(3)(b), stereodynamical factors, as a possible explanation
of discrepancies (A–C). The ASA algorithm includes all secondary
hydrogen atoms which can be contacted by the probe particle, regardless
of the impact parameter or direction of approach.[99] We had already suggested that such effects might explain
discrepancy (A), when it was first noted in previous work.[48,50] Note carefully, however, that consistent with the discussion above
of energetic effects, these will only be satisfactory explanations
if the stereodynamical effects vary strongly with the alkyl chain
length in pure liquids [to explain (A)] and significantly
with composition when mixed with fluoroalkyl chains [to explain (B)
and (C)], over and above how the exposures assessed by ASA already
depend on these variables.This does not, however, necessarily
rule them out. It is believable
from inspection of MD snapshots such as those in Figures –12, as supported by the limited analyses of chain orientation
for different chain lengths that has been carried out,[49,55] that the outer ends of longer chains tend to lie more parallel to
the surface (and perpendicular to the surface normal) than shorter
chains. This will increase the probability of the O(3P)
atom approach close to parallel to the H–C bond axis, which
is known to be the strongly preferred geometry from experiments and
ab initio potentials for gas-phase reactions of related smaller alkanes.[84,117] It will also reduce overshadowing of the reactive −CH2– positions by the unreactive terminal methyl groups.
These effects together might explain discrepancy (A). If either or
both effects depend in the correct way on the mixing ratio with fluoroalkyl
chains, which would perhaps be at least qualitatively consistent with
enhanced overshadowing of alkyl chains by bulky neighboring fluoroalkyl
groups, then they might also explain discrepancies (B) and (C). In
principle, it would be possible to assess partially whether the implied
structural changes are present in the MD simulations by further analysis
of MD snapshots. However, this could never be quantitative in the
absence of an accurate description of how the reactivity depends on
the stereodynamics. Ultimately, this would require a full dynamical
scattering calculation. Some progress has been made in this direction
using QM/MM methods for reactions of projectiles, including O(3P), with liquid surfaces, including model ILs.[118] However, it is very far from routine, and currently
highly questionable whether the relatively low-accuracy level of the
ab initio theory necessary to constrain the computational cost would
capture the subtle dynamical factors correctly.Consequently,
in the immediate future, it would be more realistic
and extremely interesting to compare the current RAS-LIF results for
the mixed alkyl/fluoroalkyl systems with alternative experimental
measurements of surface composition to establish to what extent the
quantitative observations might be method-dependent.
Conclusions
RAS-LIF measurements on mixtures of variable alkyl chain length
1-alkyl-3-methyl imidazolium-based ILs ([Cmim][Tf2N], n = 4, 6, 8, and 12) with
a fixed semiperfluorinated C8 chain analogue ([C8mimF13][Tf2N]) imply that
the fluorinated chains have a higher surface preference for alkyl
chain lengths n = 4–12. This is corroborated
for n = 8 by ST measurements, which agree quantitatively
on the under-representation of the alkyl component at the surface.MD simulations using classical force fields broadly reproduce this
effect. However, ASA analyses do not agree quantitatively with the
RAS-LIF measurements, or the more-limited ST data, in a number of
respects. In particular, the chain-length dependence of neither the
RAS-LIF OH yield in the pure alkyl liquids nor its ratio to the yield
in a fixed-composition (x = 0.25) mixture with [C8mimF13][Tf2N] is predicted correctly
by ASA-MD.An unexpectedly large contribution to the OH yield
in RAS-LIF measurements
from the terminal methyl groups would not in itself resolve these
disagreements and is in any case not supported by independent experimental
observations. Potential differential reactivities of methylene groups
as a function of their proximity to the imidazolium ring are also
not able to explain all the discrepancies. The remaining possibility,
within the assumption that the MD simulations are physically correct,
is that subtle stereochemical effects affect the OH yield in a way
that depends both on alkyl chain length and on the influence of fluorinated
chains on the mixtures.Alternatively, the classical force-fields
used in the MD simulations
may not be able to capture the structure of the liquid surface correctly.
It would be interesting to test this using more sophisticated polarizable
force fields and also to examine these intriguing materials through
alternative surface-sensitive experimental methods. If they are to
be used for future tailored applications in which uptake at, and transport
of, gases through the interface is manipulated, or accessibility of
solvated molecules is controlled, a clear understanding of the principles
that affect their surface structures will be required.
Authors: C Kolbeck; J Lehmann; K R J Lovelock; T Cremer; N Paape; P Wasserscheid; A P Fröba; F Maier; H-P Steinrück Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2010-12-08 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: F Lo Celso; G B Appetecchi; C J Jafta; L Gontrani; J N Canongia Lopes; A Triolo; O Russina Journal: J Chem Phys Date: 2018-05-21 Impact factor: 3.488